Trustworthiness in Stochastic Systems: Towards Opening the Black Box

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16461v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 19:43:09 GMT
• Title: Trustworthiness in Stochastic Systems: Towards Opening the Black Box
• Authors: Jennifer Chien, David Danks,
• Abstract summary: behavior by an AI system threatens to undermine alignment and potential trust. We take a philosophical perspective to the tension and potential conflict between foundationality and trustworthiness. We propose latent value modeling for both AI systems and users to better assess alignment.
• Score: 1.7355698649527407
• License:
• Abstract: AI systems are increasingly tasked to complete responsibilities with decreasing oversight. This delegation requires users to accept certain risks, typically mitigated by perceived or actual alignment of values between humans and AI, leading to confidence that the system will act as intended. However, stochastic behavior by an AI system threatens to undermine alignment and potential trust. In this work, we take a philosophical perspective to the tension and potential conflict between stochasticity and trustworthiness. We demonstrate how stochasticity complicates traditional methods of establishing trust and evaluate two extant approaches to managing it: (1) eliminating user-facing stochasticity to create deterministic experiences, and (2) allowing users to independently control tolerances for stochasticity. We argue that both approaches are insufficient, as not all forms of stochasticity affect trustworthiness in the same way or to the same degree. Instead, we introduce a novel definition of stochasticity and propose latent value modeling for both AI systems and users to better assess alignment. This work lays a foundational step toward understanding how and when stochasticity impacts trustworthiness, enabling more precise trust calibration in complex AI systems, and underscoring the importance of sociotechnical analyses to effectively address these challenges.

Related papers

• Know Where You're Uncertain When Planning with Multimodal Foundation Models: A Formal Framework [54.40508478482667]
  We present a comprehensive framework to disentangle, quantify, and mitigate uncertainty in perception and plan generation. We propose methods tailored to the unique properties of perception and decision-making. We show that our uncertainty disentanglement framework reduces variability by up to 40% and enhances task success rates by 5% compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T17:32:00Z)
• Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization [53.80919781981027]
  Key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of empirical risk minimization. We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T07:53:32Z)
• A Diachronic Perspective on User Trust in AI under Uncertainty [52.44939679369428]
  Modern NLP systems are often uncalibrated, resulting in confidently incorrect predictions that undermine user trust. We study the evolution of user trust in response to trust-eroding events using a betting game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T14:41:46Z)
• Who to Trust, How and Why: Untangling AI Ethics Principles, Trustworthiness and Trust [0.0]
  We argue for the need to distinguish these concepts more clearly. We discuss that trust in AI involves not only reliance on the system itself, but also trust in the developers of the AI system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T05:00:34Z)
• Why not both? Complementing explanations with uncertainty, and the role of self-confidence in Human-AI collaboration [12.47276164048813]
  We conduct an empirical study to identify how uncertainty estimates and model explanations affect users' reliance, understanding, and trust towards a model. We also discuss how the latter may distort the outcome of an analysis based on agreement and switching percentages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T12:24:33Z)
• A Systematic Literature Review of User Trust in AI-Enabled Systems: An HCI Perspective [0.0]
  User trust in Artificial Intelligence (AI) enabled systems has been increasingly recognized and proven as a key element to fostering adoption. This review aims to provide an overview of the user trust definitions, influencing factors, and measurement methods from 23 empirical studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T07:58:09Z)
• Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspective [56.80107647520364]
  We draw from communication theories and literature on trust in technologies to develop a conceptual model called MATCH. We highlight transparency and interaction as AI systems' affordances that present a wide range of trustworthiness cues to users. We propose a checklist of requirements to help technology creators identify appropriate cues to use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T00:14:33Z)
• Know Your Model (KYM): Increasing Trust in AI and Machine Learning [4.93786553432578]
  We analyze each element of trustworthiness and provide a set of 20 guidelines that can be leveraged to ensure optimal AI functionality. The guidelines help ensure that trustworthiness is provable and can be demonstrated, they are implementation agnostic, and they can be applied to any AI system in any sector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T14:08:22Z)
• Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty [66.17147341354577]
  We argue for considering a complementary form of transparency by estimating and communicating the uncertainty associated with model predictions. We describe how uncertainty can be used to mitigate model unfairness, augment decision-making, and build trustworthy systems. This work constitutes an interdisciplinary review drawn from literature spanning machine learning, visualization/HCI, design, decision-making, and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-15T17:26:14Z)
• Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI [55.4046755826066]
  We discuss a model of trust inspired by, but not identical to, sociology's interpersonal trust (i.e., trust between people) We incorporate a formalization of 'contractual trust', such that trust between a user and an AI is trust that some implicit or explicit contract will hold. We discuss how to design trustworthy AI, how to evaluate whether trust has manifested, and whether it is warranted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T03:07:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.