BRiTE: Bootstrapping Reinforced Thinking Process to Enhance Language Model Reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18858v1
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 02:39:07 GMT
- Title: BRiTE: Bootstrapping Reinforced Thinking Process to Enhance Language Model Reasoning
- Authors: Han Zhong, Yutong Yin, Shenao Zhang, Xiaojun Xu, Yuanxin Liu, Yifei Zuo, Zhihan Liu, Boyi Liu, Sirui Zheng, Hongyi Guo, Liwei Wang, Mingyi Hong, Zhaoran Wang,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks.
We present a unified probabilistic framework that formalizes LLM reasoning through a novel graphical model.
We introduce the Bootstrapping Reinforced Thinking Process (BRiTE) algorithm, which works in two steps.
- Score: 78.63421517563056
- License:
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks, yet generating reliable reasoning processes remains a significant challenge. We present a unified probabilistic framework that formalizes LLM reasoning through a novel graphical model incorporating latent thinking processes and evaluation signals. Within this framework, we introduce the Bootstrapping Reinforced Thinking Process (BRiTE) algorithm, which works in two steps. First, it generates high-quality rationales by approximating the optimal thinking process through reinforcement learning, using a novel reward shaping mechanism. Second, it enhances the base LLM by maximizing the joint probability of rationale generation with respect to the model's parameters. Theoretically, we demonstrate BRiTE's convergence at a rate of $1/T$ with $T$ representing the number of iterations. Empirical evaluations on math and coding benchmarks demonstrate that our approach consistently improves performance across different base models without requiring human-annotated thinking processes. In addition, BRiTE demonstrates superior performance compared to existing algorithms that bootstrap thinking processes use alternative methods such as rejection sampling, and can even match or exceed the results achieved through supervised fine-tuning with human-annotated data.
Related papers
- Hint Marginalization for Improved Reasoning in Large Language Models [24.67507932821155]
We present Marginalization, a novel and principled algorithmic framework to enhance the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)
Our approach can be viewed as an iterative sampling strategy for forming a Monte Carlo approximation of an underlying distribution of answers.
Empirical evaluation on several benchmark datasets for arithmetic reasoning demonstrates the superiority of the proposed approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-17T19:45:53Z) - A Comparative Study on Reasoning Patterns of OpenAI's o1 Model [69.08287909042421]
We show that OpenAI's o1 model has achieved the best performance on most datasets.
We also provide a detailed analysis on several reasoning benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T15:09:03Z) - PRefLexOR: Preference-based Recursive Language Modeling for Exploratory Optimization of Reasoning and Agentic Thinking [0.0]
PRefLexOR combines preference optimization with concepts from Reinforcement Learning to enable models to self-teach.
We focus on applications in biological materials science and demonstrate the method in a variety of case studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-16T08:46:26Z) - MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making.
We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill.
Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z) - AlphaMath Almost Zero: Process Supervision without Process [6.318873143509028]
We propose an innovative framework, AlphaMath, that bypasses the need for process annotations by leveraging Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)
This framework focuses on unleashing the potential of a well-pretrained LLM to autonomously enhance its mathematical reasoning.
The experimental results on both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets demonstrate that even without GPT-4 or human-annotated process supervision, our AlphaMath framework achieves comparable or superior results to previous state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-06T15:20:30Z) - Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for
Reasoning [64.27898739929734]
Process-Supervised Reward Model (PRM) furnishes LLMs with step-by-step feedback during the training phase.
We propose a greedy search algorithm that employs the step-level feedback from PRM to optimize the reasoning pathways explored by LLMs.
To explore the versatility of our approach, we develop a novel method to automatically generate step-level reward dataset for coding tasks and observed similar improved performance in the code generation tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-16T05:21:50Z) - Latent Variable Representation for Reinforcement Learning [131.03944557979725]
It remains unclear theoretically and empirically how latent variable models may facilitate learning, planning, and exploration to improve the sample efficiency of model-based reinforcement learning.
We provide a representation view of the latent variable models for state-action value functions, which allows both tractable variational learning algorithm and effective implementation of the optimism/pessimism principle.
In particular, we propose a computationally efficient planning algorithm with UCB exploration by incorporating kernel embeddings of latent variable models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-17T00:26:31Z) - Making Linear MDPs Practical via Contrastive Representation Learning [101.75885788118131]
It is common to address the curse of dimensionality in Markov decision processes (MDPs) by exploiting low-rank representations.
We consider an alternative definition of linear MDPs that automatically ensures normalization while allowing efficient representation learning.
We demonstrate superior performance over existing state-of-the-art model-based and model-free algorithms on several benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-14T18:18:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.