Probabilistic Optimality for Inference-time Scaling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22376v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 16:44:11 GMT
• Title: Probabilistic Optimality for Inference-time Scaling
• Authors: Youkang Wang, Jian Wang, Rubing Chen, Xiao-Yong Wei, Qing Li,
• Abstract summary: Inference-time scaling has emerged as a powerful technique for enhancing the reasoning performance of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose a probabilistic framework that formalizes the optimality of inference-time scaling under the assumption that parallel samples are independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.)<n>Within this framework, we derive a theoretical lower bound on the required number of samples to achieve a target performance level, providing the first principled guidance for compute-efficient scaling.
• Score: 11.92228840747636
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Inference-time scaling has emerged as a powerful technique for enhancing the reasoning performance of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing approaches often rely on heuristic strategies for parallel sampling, lacking a principled foundation. To address this gap, we propose a probabilistic framework that formalizes the optimality of inference-time scaling under the assumption that parallel samples are independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.), and where the Best-of-N selection strategy follows a probability distribution that can be estimated. Within this framework, we derive a theoretical lower bound on the required number of samples to achieve a target performance level, providing the first principled guidance for compute-efficient scaling. Leveraging this insight, we develop \textsc{OptScale}, a practical algorithm that dynamically determines the optimal number of sampled responses. \textsc{OptScale} employs a language model-based predictor to estimate probabilistic prior parameters, enabling the decision of the minimal number of samples needed that satisfy predefined performance thresholds and confidence levels. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks (including MATH-500, GSM8K, AIME, and AMC) demonstrate that \textsc{OptScale} significantly reduces sampling overhead while remaining better or on par with state-of-the-art reasoning performance. Our work offers both a theoretical foundation and a practical solution for principled inference-time scaling, addressing a critical gap in the efficient deployment of LLMs for complex reasoning.

Related papers

• An Experimental Approach for Running-Time Estimation of Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms in Numerical Optimization [16.66619776655723]
  We propose an experimental approach for estimating upper bounds on the running time of MOEAs without algorithmic assumptions.<n>We conduct comprehensive experiments on five representative MOEAs using the ZDT and DTLZ benchmark suites.<n>Results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in estimating upper bounds on the running time without requiring algorithmic or problem simplifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T07:06:14Z)
• DynScaling: Efficient Verifier-free Inference Scaling via Dynamic and Integrated Sampling [20.605487145370752]
  Inference-time scaling has proven effective in boosting large language model (LLM) performance through increased test-time computation.<n>Yet, its practical application is often hindered by reliance on external verifiers or a lack of optimization for realistic computational constraints.<n>We propose DynScaling, which addresses these limitations through two primary innovations: an integrated parallel-sequential sampling strategy and a bandit-based dynamic budget allocation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T05:40:54Z)
• A Theory of Inference Compute Scaling: Reasoning through Directed Stochastic Skill Search [15.387256204743407]
  Large language models (LLMs) demand considerable computational, energy, and financial resources during both training and deployment.<n>Inference costs now represent a significant and growing component of the overall resource burden.<n>We introduce directed skill search (DS3), a general framework that represents inference as expressive over a learned skill graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T14:47:48Z)
• BRiTE: Bootstrapping Reinforced Thinking Process to Enhance Language Model Reasoning [78.63421517563056]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks.<n>We present a unified probabilistic framework that formalizes LLM reasoning through a novel graphical model.<n>We introduce the Bootstrapping Reinforced Thinking Process (BRiTE) algorithm, which works in two steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T02:39:07Z)
• Bayesian Nonparametrics Meets Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Optimization [29.24821214671497]
  Training machine learning and statistical models often involve optimizing a data-driven risk criterion. We propose a novel robust criterion by combining insights from Bayesian nonparametric (i.e., Dirichlet process) theory and a recent decision-theoretic model of smooth ambiguity-averse preferences. For practical implementation, we propose and study tractable approximations of the criterion based on well-known Dirichlet process representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T21:19:15Z)
• Federated Conditional Stochastic Optimization [110.513884892319]
  Conditional optimization has found in a wide range of machine learning tasks, such as in-variant learning tasks, AUPRC, andAML. This paper proposes algorithms for distributed federated learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T01:47:37Z)
• Efficient Model-Free Exploration in Low-Rank MDPs [76.87340323826945]
  Low-Rank Markov Decision Processes offer a simple, yet expressive framework for RL with function approximation. Existing algorithms are either (1) computationally intractable, or (2) reliant upon restrictive statistical assumptions. We propose the first provably sample-efficient algorithm for exploration in Low-Rank MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-08T15:41:48Z)
• Learning Unnormalized Statistical Models via Compositional Optimization [73.30514599338407]
  Noise-contrastive estimation(NCE) has been proposed by formulating the objective as the logistic loss of the real data and the artificial noise. In this paper, we study it a direct approach for optimizing the negative log-likelihood of unnormalized models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T01:18:16Z)
• Outlier-Robust Sparse Estimation via Non-Convex Optimization [73.18654719887205]
  We explore the connection between high-dimensional statistics and non-robust optimization in the presence of sparsity constraints. We develop novel and simple optimization formulations for these problems. As a corollary, we obtain that any first-order method that efficiently converges to station yields an efficient algorithm for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-23T17:38:24Z)
• Amortized Conditional Normalized Maximum Likelihood: Reliable Out of Distribution Uncertainty Estimation [99.92568326314667]
  We propose the amortized conditional normalized maximum likelihood (ACNML) method as a scalable general-purpose approach for uncertainty estimation. Our algorithm builds on the conditional normalized maximum likelihood (CNML) coding scheme, which has minimax optimal properties according to the minimum description length principle. We demonstrate that ACNML compares favorably to a number of prior techniques for uncertainty estimation in terms of calibration on out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-05T08:04:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.