What is causal about causal models and representations?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.19335v2
• Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 17:24:50 GMT
• Title: What is causal about causal models and representations?
• Authors: Frederik Hytting Jørgensen, Luigi Gresele, Sebastian Weichwald,
• Abstract summary: Causal Bayesian networks are 'causal' models since they make predictions about interventional distributions. To connect such causal model predictions to real-world outcomes, we must determine which actions in the world correspond to which interventions in the model. We introduce a formal framework to make such requirements for different interpretations of actions as interventions precise.
• Score: 5.128695263114213
• License:
• Abstract: Causal Bayesian networks are 'causal' models since they make predictions about interventional distributions. To connect such causal model predictions to real-world outcomes, we must determine which actions in the world correspond to which interventions in the model. For example, to interpret an action as an intervention on a treatment variable, the action will presumably have to a) change the distribution of treatment in a way that corresponds to the intervention, and b) not change other aspects, such as how the outcome depends on the treatment; while the marginal distributions of some variables may change as an effect. We introduce a formal framework to make such requirements for different interpretations of actions as interventions precise. We prove that the seemingly natural interpretation of actions as interventions is circular: Under this interpretation, every causal Bayesian network that correctly models the observational distribution is trivially also interventionally valid, and no action yields empirical data that could possibly falsify such a model. We prove an impossibility result: No interpretation exists that is non-circular and simultaneously satisfies a set of natural desiderata. Instead, we examine non-circular interpretations that may violate some desiderata and show how this may in turn enable the falsification of causal models. By rigorously examining how a causal Bayesian network could be a 'causal' model of the world instead of merely a mathematical object, our formal framework contributes to the conceptual foundations of causal representation learning, causal discovery, and causal abstraction, while also highlighting some limitations of existing approaches.

Related papers

• Generative Intervention Models for Causal Perturbation Modeling [80.72074987374141]
  In many applications, it is a priori unknown which mechanisms of a system are modified by an external perturbation. We propose a generative intervention model (GIM) that learns to map these perturbation features to distributions over atomic interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T10:37:57Z)
• Linking Model Intervention to Causal Interpretation in Model Explanation [34.21877996496178]
  We will study the conditions when an intuitive model intervention effect has a causal interpretation. This work links the model intervention effect to the causal interpretation of a model. Experiments on semi-synthetic datasets have been conducted to validate theorems and show the potential for using the model intervention effect for model interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T05:16:59Z)
• Identifiable Latent Neural Causal Models [82.14087963690561]
  Causal representation learning seeks to uncover latent, high-level causal representations from low-level observed data. We determine the types of distribution shifts that do contribute to the identifiability of causal representations. We translate our findings into a practical algorithm, allowing for the acquisition of reliable latent causal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T04:13:55Z)
• Identifiability Guarantees for Causal Disentanglement from Soft Interventions [26.435199501882806]
  Causal disentanglement aims to uncover a representation of data using latent variables that are interrelated through a causal model. In this paper, we focus on the scenario where unpaired observational and interventional data are available, with each intervention changing the mechanism of a latent variable. When the causal variables are fully observed, statistically consistent algorithms have been developed to identify the causal model under faithfulness assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T15:39:39Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• On the Interventional Kullback-Leibler Divergence [11.57430292133273]
  We introduce the Interventional Kullback-Leibler divergence to quantify both structural and distributional differences between causal models. We propose a sufficient condition on the intervention targets to identify subsets of observed variables on which the models provably agree or disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T17:03:29Z)
• Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
  We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs. We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables. We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z)
• Structural Causal Models Are (Solvable by) Credal Networks [70.45873402967297]
  Causal inferences can be obtained by standard algorithms for the updating of credal nets. This contribution should be regarded as a systematic approach to represent structural causal models by credal networks. Experiments show that approximate algorithms for credal networks can immediately be used to do causal inference in real-size problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T11:19:36Z)
• A Critical View of the Structural Causal Model [89.43277111586258]
  We show that one can identify the cause and the effect without considering their interaction at all. We propose a new adversarial training method that mimics the disentangled structure of the causal model. Our multidimensional method outperforms the literature methods on both synthetic and real world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-23T22:52:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.