Related papers: The Solo Revolution: A Theory of AI-Enabled Individual Entrepreneurship

Related papers

Sustainability by Design in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: An Empirical Review of Governance, Innovation, and Institutional Design [5.209373486278134]
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) represent an emerging form of innovation ecosystem characterized by blockchain-based transparency, open participation, and token-driven governance.<n>This study compares two standards, ERC-8004 and Google A2A, who address the same agent interoperability question.<n>The study provides evidence-based insights for scholars, policymakers, and designers seeking to align innovation, technological governance, and sustainability in future organizational forms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-04T03:49:28Z)
Trustworthy AI Suffers from Invariance Conflicts and Causality is The Solution [80.98492754957466]
Core trustworthy AI objectives, such as fairness, robustness, privacy, and explainability, are hard to achieve simultaneously.<n>This paper argues that causality is necessary to understand and balance trade-offs in performance and multiple objectives of trustworthy AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-04T14:26:28Z)
The Hourglass Revolution: A Theoretical Framework of AI's Impact on Organizational Structures in Developed and Emerging Markets [0.0]
This paper presents a theoretical framework examining how artificial intelligence (AI) transforms organizational structures.<n>The analysis identifies three key mechanisms that demonstrate how AI enables organizational forms transcending traditional structural boundaries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-18T11:52:29Z)
The Three Axes of Success: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Career Decision-Making [0.0]
We propose The Three Axes of Success, a normative decision framework decomposing career trajectories into Wealth, Autonomy, and Meaning.<n>We operationalize each axis through measurable proxies, analyze career archetypes, and derive sequential or simultaneous optimization strategies under uncertainty.<n>This provides the first unified decision-theoretic treatment of career success, integrating insights from human capital theory, self-determination theory, and effective altruism into a coherent architecture for rational career design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T16:54:56Z)
Strategic Self-Improvement for Competitive Agents in AI Labour Markets [45.88028371034407]
This paper puts forward a groundbreaking new framework that is the first to capture the real-world economic forces that shape agentic labor markets.<n>We illustrate our framework through a tractable simulated gig economy where agentic Large Language Models (LLMs) compete for jobs.<n>Our simulations reproduce classic macroeconomic phenomena found in human labor markets, while controlled experiments reveal potential AI-driven economic trends.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-04T16:57:28Z)
AI Exchange Platforms [1.143498094481099]
The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence into organizational technology frameworks has transformed how organizations engage with AI-driven models.<n>The importance of structured platforms for AI model exchange has become paramount for organizational efficacy and adaptability.<n>This paper serves as a critical resource for understanding the dynamic interplay between technology, business models, and user engagement in the rapidly growing domain of AI model exchanges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-07T19:19:25Z)
The Architecture of AI Transformation: Four Strategic Patterns and an Emerging Frontier [0.0]
95% of enterprises report no measurable profit impact from AI deployments.<n>We propose a 2x2 framework that reconceptualizes AI strategy along two independent dimensions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-02T21:57:58Z)
From Firms to Computation: AI Governance and the Evolution of Institutions [0.0]
This article synthesizes three frameworks: multi-level selection theory, Aoki's view of firms as computational processes, and Ostrom's design principles for robust institutions.<n>We develop a framework where selection operates concurrently across organizational levels, firms implement distributed inference via game-theoretic architectures, and Ostrom-style rules evolve as alignment mechanisms that address AI-related risks.<n>We conclude by proposing a set of design principles that operationalize alignment between humans and AI across institutional layers, enabling scalable, adaptive, and inclusive governance of agential AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-18T02:52:58Z)
The Societal Impact of Foundation Models: Advancing Evidence-based AI Policy [14.679051711850393]
dissertation explains how technology and society coevolve in the age of AI, organized around three themes.<n>First, the conceptual framing: the capabilities, risks, and the supply chain that grounds foundation models in the broader economy.<n>Second, the empirical insights that enrich the conceptual foundations: transparency created via evaluations at the model level and indexes at the organization level.<n>Third, the transition from understanding to action: superior understanding of the societal impact of foundation models advances evidence-based AI policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-29T07:16:48Z)
From Model Design to Organizational Design: Complexity Redistribution and Trade-Offs in Generative AI [44.99833362998488]
We argue that viewing AI as a simple reduction in input costs overlooks two critical dynamics.<n>The GAS trade-off, therefore, does not disappear but is relocated from the user to the organization.<n>This study advances AI strategy by clarifying how scalable cognition relocates complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-10T15:22:09Z)
The Agentic Economy [46.77230659526348]
We argue that the more profound economic impact lies in reducing communication frictions between consumers and businesses.<n>This shift could reorganize markets, redistribute power, and catalyze the creation of new products and services.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T17:51:36Z)
Generative AI for Autonomous Driving: Frontiers and Opportunities [145.6465312554513]
This survey delivers a comprehensive synthesis of the emerging role of GenAI across the autonomous driving stack.<n>We begin by distilling the principles and trade-offs of modern generative modeling, encompassing VAEs, GANs, Diffusion Models, and Large Language Models.<n>We categorize practical applications, such as synthetic data generalization, end-to-end driving strategies, high-fidelity digital twin systems, smart transportation networks, and cross-domain transfer to embodied AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-13T17:59:20Z)
Enterprise Architecture as a Dynamic Capability for Scalable and Sustainable Generative AI adoption: Bridging Innovation and Governance in Large Organisations [55.2480439325792]
Generative Artificial Intelligence is a powerful new technology with the potential to boost innovation and reshape governance in many industries.<n>However, organisations face major challenges in scaling GenAI, including technology complexity, governance gaps and resource misalignments.<n>This study explores how Enterprise Architecture Management can meet the complex requirements of GenAI adoption within large enterprises.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-09T07:41:33Z)
KERAIA: An Adaptive and Explainable Framework for Dynamic Knowledge Representation and Reasoning [46.85451489222176]
KERAIA is a novel framework and software platform for symbolic knowledge engineering.<n>It addresses the persistent challenges of representing, reasoning with, and executing knowledge in dynamic, complex, and context-sensitive environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-07T10:56:05Z)
Synthetic media and computational capitalism: towards a critical theory of artificial intelligence [0.0]
I argue that we need new critical methods capable of addressing both the technical specificity of AI systems and their role in restructuring forms of life under computational capitalism. The paper concludes by suggesting that critical reflexivity is needed to engage with the algorithmic condition without being subsumed by it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-22T22:59:28Z)
Augmenting Minds or Automating Skills: The Differential Role of Human Capital in Generative AI's Impact on Creative Tasks [4.39919134458872]
Generative AI is rapidly reshaping creative work, raising critical questions about its beneficiaries and societal implications.<n>This study challenges prevailing assumptions by exploring how generative AI interacts with diverse forms of human capital in creative tasks.<n>While AI democratizes access to creative tools, it simultaneously amplifies cognitive inequalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-05T08:27:14Z)
Advancing Interactive Explainable AI via Belief Change Theory [5.842480645870251]
We argue that this type of formalisation provides a framework and a methodology to develop interactive explanations. We first define a novel, logic-based formalism to represent explanatory information shared between humans and machines. We then consider real world scenarios for interactive XAI, with different prioritisations of new and existing knowledge, where our formalism may be instantiated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-13T13:11:56Z)
AI and Social Theory [0.0]
We sketch a programme for AI driven social theory, starting by defining what we mean by artificial intelligence (AI) We then lay out our model for how AI based models can draw on the growing availability of digital data to help test the validity of different social theories based on their predictive power.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-07T12:26:16Z)
Hierarchical Invariance for Robust and Interpretable Vision Tasks at Larger Scales [54.78115855552886]
We show how to construct over-complete invariants with a Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)-like hierarchical architecture. With the over-completeness, discriminative features w.r.t. the task can be adaptively formed in a Neural Architecture Search (NAS)-like manner. For robust and interpretable vision tasks at larger scales, hierarchical invariant representation can be considered as an effective alternative to traditional CNN and invariants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-23T16:50:07Z)
Emergent Explainability: Adding a causal chain to neural network inference [0.0]
This position paper presents a theoretical framework for enhancing explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) through emergent communication (EmCom) We explore the novel integration of EmCom into AI systems, offering a paradigm shift from conventional associative relationships between inputs and outputs to a more nuanced, causal interpretation. The paper discusses the theoretical underpinnings of this approach, its potential broad applications, and its alignment with the growing need for responsible and transparent AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T02:28:39Z)
Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
Active Inference in Robotics and Artificial Agents: Survey and Challenges [51.29077770446286]
We review the state-of-the-art theory and implementations of active inference for state-estimation, control, planning and learning. We showcase relevant experiments that illustrate its potential in terms of adaptation, generalization and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-03T12:10:26Z)
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models [256.61956234436553]
We call these models foundation models to underscore their critically central yet incomplete character. This report provides a thorough account of the opportunities and risks of foundation models. To tackle these questions, we believe much of the critical research on foundation models will require deep interdisciplinary collaboration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-16T17:50:08Z)
The AI Economist: Optimal Economic Policy Design via Two-level Deep Reinforcement Learning [126.37520136341094]
We show that machine-learning-based economic simulation is a powerful policy and mechanism design framework. The AI Economist is a two-level, deep RL framework that trains both agents and a social planner who co-adapt. In simple one-step economies, the AI Economist recovers the optimal tax policy of economic theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-05T17:42:35Z)
Decentralized Reinforcement Learning: Global Decision-Making via Local Economic Transactions [80.49176924360499]
We establish a framework for directing a society of simple, specialized, self-interested agents to solve sequential decision problems. We derive a class of decentralized reinforcement learning algorithms. We demonstrate the potential advantages of a society's inherent modular structure for more efficient transfer learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-05T16:41:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.