DAMA: Data- and Model-aware Alignment of Multi-modal LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01943v2
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 03:55:29 GMT
- Title: DAMA: Data- and Model-aware Alignment of Multi-modal LLMs
- Authors: Jinda Lu, Junkang Wu, Jinghan Li, Xiaojun Jia, Shuo Wang, YiFan Zhang, Junfeng Fang, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He,
- Abstract summary: We propose Data- and Model-aware DPO (DAMA) to adjust the optimization process from two key aspects.
By combining the two strategies, DAMA enables the model to effectively adapt to data with varying levels of hardness.
- Score: 31.116618294885065
- License:
- Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has shown effectiveness in aligning multi-modal large language models (MLLM) with human preferences. However, existing methods exhibit an imbalanced responsiveness to the data of varying hardness, tending to overfit on the easy-to-distinguish data while underfitting on the hard-to-distinguish data. In this paper, we propose Data- and Model-aware DPO (DAMA) to dynamically adjust the optimization process from two key aspects: (1) a data-aware strategy that incorporates data hardness, and (2) a model-aware strategy that integrates real-time model responses. By combining the two strategies, DAMA enables the model to effectively adapt to data with varying levels of hardness. Extensive experiments on five benchmarks demonstrate that DAMA not only significantly enhances the trustworthiness, but also improves the effectiveness over general tasks. For instance, on the Object-HalBench, our DAMA-7B reduces response-level and mentioned-level hallucination by 90.0% and 95.3%, respectively, surpassing the performance of GPT-4V.
Related papers
- Dynamic Noise Preference Optimization for LLM Self-Improvement via Synthetic Data [51.62162460809116]
We introduce Dynamic Noise Preference Optimization (DNPO) to ensure consistent improvements across iterations.
In experiments with Zephyr-7B, DNPO consistently outperforms existing methods, showing an average performance boost of 2.6%.
DNPO shows a significant improvement in model-generated data quality, with a 29.4% win-loss rate gap compared to the baseline in GPT-4 evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-08T01:20:09Z) - Multimodal Preference Data Synthetic Alignment with Reward Model [23.978820500281213]
We propose a new framework in generating synthetic data using a reward model as a proxy of human preference for effective multimodal alignment with DPO training.
Experiment results indicate that integrating selected synthetic data, such as from generative and rewards models can effectively reduce reliance on human-annotated data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-23T09:29:40Z) - Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction Tuning [71.2981957820888]
We propose a novel Star-Agents framework, which automates the enhancement of data quality across datasets.
The framework initially generates diverse instruction data with multiple LLM agents through a bespoke sampling method.
The generated data undergo a rigorous evaluation using a dual-model method that assesses both difficulty and quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T02:30:53Z) - Enhancing the Reasoning Ability of Multimodal Large Language Models via Mixed Preference Optimization [65.64108848398696]
We introduce a preference optimization process to enhance the multimodal reasoning capabilities of MLLMs.
We develop a simple yet effective method, termed Mixed Preference Optimization (MPO), which boosts multimodal CoT performance.
Our model, InternVL2-8B-MPO, achieves an accuracy of 67.0 on MathVista, outperforming InternVL2-8B by 8.7 points and achieving performance comparable to the 10x larger InternVL2-76B.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-15T18:59:27Z) - Optimizing LLMs with Direct Preferences: A Data Efficiency Perspective [4.548047308860141]
This study investigates the impact of different type of preference data on model performance.
It aims to reduce their dependency on extensive amounts of preference data, which is expensive to collect.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-22T00:11:41Z) - MITA: Bridging the Gap between Model and Data for Test-time Adaptation [68.62509948690698]
Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a promising paradigm for enhancing the generalizability of models.
We propose Meet-In-The-Middle based MITA, which introduces energy-based optimization to encourage mutual adaptation of the model and data from opposing directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-12T07:02:33Z) - Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimization [75.1240295759264]
We propose an effective framework for Bridging and Modeling Correlations in pairwise data, named BMC.
We increase the consistency and informativeness of the pairwise preference signals through targeted modifications.
We identify that DPO alone is insufficient to model these correlations and capture nuanced variations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-14T11:29:47Z) - P3: A Policy-Driven, Pace-Adaptive, and Diversity-Promoted Framework for data pruning in LLM Training [22.61313628957683]
This paper introduces P3, an adaptive framework aimed at optimizing the task-specific fine-tuning process through iterative data pruning.
P3 consists of three key components: Policy-driven Difficulty Measurement, Pace-Adaptive Selection, and Diversity Promotion.
We validate P3 on the reasoning scenarios, APPS and MATH, demonstrating significant improvements over traditional data pruning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-10T12:44:49Z) - When Parameter-efficient Tuning Meets General-purpose Vision-language
Models [65.19127815275307]
PETAL revolutionizes the training process by requiring only 0.5% of the total parameters, achieved through a unique mode approximation technique.
Our experiments reveal that PETAL not only outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in most scenarios but also surpasses full fine-tuning models in effectiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-16T17:13:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.