A Self-Supervised Paradigm for Data-Efficient Medical Foundation Model Pre-training: V-information Optimization Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07107v4
• Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 02:50:25 GMT
• Title: A Self-Supervised Paradigm for Data-Efficient Medical Foundation Model Pre-training: V-information Optimization Framework
• Authors: Wenxuan Yang, Hanyu Zhang, Weimin Tan, Yuqi Sun, Bo Yan,
• Abstract summary: Self-supervised pre-training medical foundation models on large-scale datasets demonstrate exceptional performance.<n>Recent research challenges this common paradigm by introducing data-effective learning approaches.<n>We introduce V-information into self-supervised pre-training of foundation models to provide a theoretical foundation for sample selection.
• Score: 15.413974936297082
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Self-supervised pre-training medical foundation models on large-scale datasets demonstrate exceptional performance. Recent research challenges this common paradigm by introducing data-effective learning approaches, demonstrating that merely increasing pre-training data volume does not necessarily improve model performance. However, current methods still have unclear standards and the underlying theoretical foundation remains unknown. In this paper, as the first attempt to address this limitation, we introduce V-information into self-supervised pre-training of foundation models to provide a theoretical foundation for sample selection. Our derivation confirms that by optimizing V-information, sample selection can be framed as an optimization problem where choosing diverse and challenging samples enhances model performance even under limited training data. Under this guidance, we develop an optimized data-effective learning method (OptiDEL) to optimize V-information in real-world medical domains by generating more diverse and harder samples. We compare the OptiDEL method with state-of-the-art approaches finding that OptiDEL consistently outperforms existing approaches across eight different datasets, with foundation models trained on only 5% of the pre-training data achieving up to 6.2% higher mIoU than those trained on the full dataset. Remarkably, OptiDEL demonstrates an average improvement of 4.7% mIoU over competing methods while using 20x less training data.

Related papers

• Clear Preferences Leave Traces: Reference Model-Guided Sampling for Preference Learning [59.11519451499754]
  Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a de-facto approach for aligning language models with human preferences. Recent work has shown DPO's effectiveness relies on training data quality. We discover that reference model probability space naturally detects high-quality training samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-25T07:21:50Z)
• Feasible Learning [78.6167929413604]
  We introduce Feasible Learning (FL), a sample-centric learning paradigm where models are trained by solving a feasibility problem that bounds the loss for each training sample. Our empirical analysis, spanning image classification, age regression, and preference optimization in large language models, demonstrates that models trained via FL can learn from data while displaying improved tail behavior compared to ERM, with only a marginal impact on average performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T20:39:38Z)
• Optimizing LLMs with Direct Preferences: A Data Efficiency Perspective [4.548047308860141]
  This study investigates the impact of different type of preference data on model performance. It aims to reduce their dependency on extensive amounts of preference data, which is expensive to collect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T00:11:41Z)
• A CLIP-Powered Framework for Robust and Generalizable Data Selection [51.46695086779598]
  Real-world datasets often contain redundant and noisy data, imposing a negative impact on training efficiency and model performance. Data selection has shown promise in identifying the most representative samples from the entire dataset. We propose a novel CLIP-powered data selection framework that leverages multimodal information for more robust and generalizable sample selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T03:00:58Z)
• Rejection Sampling IMLE: Designing Priors for Better Few-Shot Image Synthesis [7.234618871984921]
  An emerging area of research aims to learn deep generative models with limited training data. We propose RS-IMLE, a novel approach that changes the prior distribution used for training. This leads to substantially higher quality image generation compared to existing GAN and IMLE-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T00:19:42Z)
• Crafting Efficient Fine-Tuning Strategies for Large Language Models [2.633490094119608]
  Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) with as few as 200 samples can improve model accuracy from 70% to 88% in a product attribute extraction task. A bayesian hyperparameter optimization method, which evaluates models at 20% of total training time, correlates strongly with final model performance. This approach led to a 2% improvement in accuracy over baseline models when evaluated on an independent test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T21:36:00Z)
• Data Shapley in One Training Run [88.59484417202454]
  Data Shapley provides a principled framework for attributing data's contribution within machine learning contexts. Existing approaches require re-training models on different data subsets, which is computationally intensive. This paper introduces In-Run Data Shapley, which addresses these limitations by offering scalable data attribution for a target model of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T17:09:24Z)
• Rethinking Overlooked Aspects in Vision-Language Models [32.525916879333145]
  Recent advancements in vision-language models (LVLMs) have been substantial. Recent works mainly focus on introducing more pre-training and instruction tuning data to improve model's performance. This paper delves into the often-neglected aspects of data efficiency during pre-training and the selection process for instruction tuning datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T07:53:41Z)
• How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs [56.41105687693619]
  We study data-efficient approaches for pre-training language models (LLMs) We find that Ask-LLM and Density sampling are the best methods in their respective categories. In our comparison of 19 samplers, involving hundreds of evaluation tasks and pre-training runs, we find that Ask-LLM and Density are the best methods in their respective categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T02:27:57Z)
• Towards Accelerated Model Training via Bayesian Data Selection [45.62338106716745]
  We propose a more reasonable data selection principle by examining the data's impact on the model's generalization loss. Recent work has proposed a more reasonable data selection principle by examining the data's impact on the model's generalization loss. This work solves these problems by leveraging a lightweight Bayesian treatment and incorporating off-the-shelf zero-shot predictors built on large-scale pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T07:58:15Z)
• An Empirical Study of Pre-trained Model Selection for Out-of-Distribution Generalization and Calibration [11.102950630209879]
  In out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization tasks, fine-tuning pre-trained models has become a prevalent strategy. We examined how pre-trained model size, pre-training dataset size, and training strategies impact generalization and uncertainty calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T01:27:10Z)
• Universal Domain Adaptation from Foundation Models: A Baseline Study [58.51162198585434]
  We make empirical studies of state-of-the-art UniDA methods using foundation models. We introduce textitCLIP distillation, a parameter-free method specifically designed to distill target knowledge from CLIP models. Although simple, our method outperforms previous approaches in most benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T16:28:29Z)
• Self-Distillation for Further Pre-training of Transformers [83.84227016847096]
  We propose self-distillation as a regularization for a further pre-training stage. We empirically validate the efficacy of self-distillation on a variety of benchmark datasets for image and text classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T02:25:12Z)
• An Empirical Study on Distribution Shift Robustness From the Perspective of Pre-Training and Data Augmentation [91.62129090006745]
  This paper studies the distribution shift problem from the perspective of pre-training and data augmentation. We provide the first comprehensive empirical study focusing on pre-training and data augmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T13:04:53Z)
• Improved Fine-tuning by Leveraging Pre-training Data: Theory and Practice [52.11183787786718]
  Fine-tuning a pre-trained model on the target data is widely used in many deep learning applications. Recent studies have empirically shown that training from scratch has the final performance that is no worse than this pre-training strategy. We propose a novel selection strategy to select a subset from pre-training data to help improve the generalization on the target task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-24T06:18:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.