Evaluating Text Style Transfer Evaluation: Are There Any Reliable Metrics?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04718v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 07:39:17 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Text Style Transfer Evaluation: Are There Any Reliable Metrics?
• Authors: Sourabrata Mukherjee, Atul Kr. Ojha, John P. McCrae, Ondrej Dusek,
• Abstract summary: Text Style Transfer (TST) is the task of transforming a text to reflect a particular style while preserving its original content. Using human evaluation is ideal but costly, same as in other natural language processing (NLP) tasks. In this paper, we examine both set of existing and novel metrics from broader NLP tasks for TST evaluation.
• Score: 9.234136424254261
• License:
• Abstract: Text Style Transfer (TST) is the task of transforming a text to reflect a particular style while preserving its original content. Evaluating TST outputs is a multidimensional challenge, requiring the assessment of style transfer accuracy, content preservation, and naturalness. Using human evaluation is ideal but costly, same as in other natural language processing (NLP) tasks, however, automatic metrics for TST have not received as much attention as metrics for, e.g., machine translation or summarization. In this paper, we examine both set of existing and novel metrics from broader NLP tasks for TST evaluation, focusing on two popular subtasks-sentiment transfer and detoxification-in a multilingual context comprising English, Hindi, and Bengali. By conducting meta-evaluation through correlation with human judgments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of these metrics when used individually and in ensembles. Additionally, we investigate the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) as tools for TST evaluation. Our findings highlight that certain advanced NLP metrics and experimental-hybrid-techniques, provide better insights than existing TST metrics for delivering more accurate, consistent, and reproducible TST evaluations.

Related papers

• Text Style Transfer Evaluation Using Large Language Models [24.64611983641699]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown their capacity to match and even exceed average human performance. We compare the results of different LLMs in TST using multiple input prompts. Our findings highlight a strong correlation between (even zero-shot) prompting and human evaluation, showing that LLMs often outperform traditional automated metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T13:07:33Z)
• Translation-Enhanced Multilingual Text-to-Image Generation [61.41730893884428]
  Research on text-to-image generation (TTI) still predominantly focuses on the English language. In this work, we thus investigate multilingual TTI and the current potential of neural machine translation (NMT) to bootstrap mTTI systems. We propose Ensemble Adapter (EnsAd), a novel parameter-efficient approach that learns to weigh and consolidate the multilingual text knowledge within the mTTI framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T17:03:52Z)
• Multidimensional Evaluation for Text Style Transfer Using ChatGPT [14.799109368073548]
  We investigate the potential of ChatGPT as a multidimensional evaluator for the task of emphText Style Transfer We test its performance on three commonly-used dimensions of text style transfer evaluation: style strength, content preservation, and fluency. These preliminary results are expected to provide a first glimpse into the role of large language models in the multidimensional evaluation of stylized text generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-26T11:33:35Z)
• Code-Switching Text Generation and Injection in Mandarin-English ASR [57.57570417273262]
  We investigate text generation and injection for improving the performance of an industry commonly-used streaming model, Transformer-Transducer (T-T) We first propose a strategy to generate code-switching text data and then investigate injecting generated text into T-T model explicitly by Text-To-Speech (TTS) conversion or implicitly by tying speech and text latent spaces. Experimental results on the T-T model trained with a dataset containing 1,800 hours of real Mandarin-English code-switched speech show that our approaches to inject generated code-switching text significantly boost the performance of T-T models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T09:13:27Z)
• Statistical Machine Translation for Indic Languages [1.8899300124593648]
  This paper canvasses about the development of bilingual Statistical Machine Translation models. To create the system, MOSES open-source SMT toolkit is explored. In our experiment, the quality of the translation is evaluated using standard metrics such as BLEU, METEOR, and RIBES.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T06:23:12Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Machine Translation Metrics [78.75776477562087]
  It is unclear if automatic metrics are reliable at distinguishing good translations from bad translations at the sentence level. We evaluate the segment-level performance of the most widely used MT metrics (chrF, COMET, BERTScore, etc.) on three downstream cross-lingual tasks. Our experiments demonstrate that all metrics exhibit negligible correlation with the extrinsic evaluation of the downstream outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T14:39:58Z)
• MT Metrics Correlate with Human Ratings of Simultaneous Speech Translation [10.132491257235024]
  We conduct an extensive correlation analysis of Continuous Ratings (CR) and offline machine translation evaluation metrics. Our study reveals that the offline metrics are well correlated with CR and can be reliably used for evaluating machine translation in simultaneous mode. We conclude that given the current quality levels of SST, these metrics can be used as proxies for CR, alleviating the need for large scale human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T03:03:56Z)
• Measuring Uncertainty in Translation Quality Evaluation (TQE) [62.997667081978825]
  This work carries out motivated research to correctly estimate the confidence intervals citeBrown_etal2001Interval depending on the sample size of the translated text. The methodology we applied for this work is from Bernoulli Statistical Distribution Modelling (BSDM) and Monte Carlo Sampling Analysis (MCSA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T12:09:08Z)
• TextFlint: Unified Multilingual Robustness Evaluation Toolkit for Natural Language Processing [73.16475763422446]
  We propose a multilingual robustness evaluation platform for NLP tasks (TextFlint) It incorporates universal text transformation, task-specific transformation, adversarial attack, subpopulation, and their combinations to provide comprehensive robustness analysis. TextFlint generates complete analytical reports as well as targeted augmented data to address the shortcomings of the model's robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-21T17:20:38Z)
• GO FIGURE: A Meta Evaluation of Factuality in Summarization [131.1087461486504]
  We introduce GO FIGURE, a meta-evaluation framework for evaluating factuality evaluation metrics. Our benchmark analysis on ten factuality metrics reveals that our framework provides a robust and efficient evaluation. It also reveals that while QA metrics generally improve over standard metrics that measure factuality across domains, performance is highly dependent on the way in which questions are generated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T08:30:20Z)
• Text Style Transfer: A Review and Experimental Evaluation [26.946157705298685]
  The Text Style Transfer (TST) task aims to change the stylistic properties of the text while retaining its style independent content. Many novel TST algorithms have been developed, while the industry has leveraged these algorithms to enable exciting TST applications. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of recent research efforts on text style transfer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T02:02:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.