Conditioning and AGM-like belief change in the Desirability-Indifference framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06235v2
• Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 12:51:59 GMT
• Title: Conditioning and AGM-like belief change in the Desirability-Indifference framework
• Authors: Kathelijne Coussement, Gert de Cooman, Keano De Vos,
• Abstract summary: We show how the AGM framework for belief change can be extended to deal with conditioning in the so-called Desirability-Indifference framework.<n>This level of abstraction allows us to deal simultaneously with classical and quantum probability theory.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We show how the AGM framework for belief change (expansion, revision, contraction) can be extended to deal with conditioning in the so-called Desirability-Indifference framework, based on abstract notions of accepting and rejecting options, as well as on abstract notions of events. This level of abstraction allows us to deal simultaneously with classical and quantum probability theory.

Related papers

• Conditioning Accept-Desirability models in the context of AGM-like belief change [0.0]
  We discuss conditionalisation for Accept-Desirability models in an abstract decision-making framework.<n>We introduce a new conditioning rule for our Accept-Desirability models, based on the idea that observing an event introduces new indifferences between options.<n>We investigate two interesting special cases where all of these axioms are shown to still hold: classical propositional logic and full conditional probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T07:07:34Z)
• Learning the Value of Value Learning [0.0]
  We extend the Jeffrey-Bolker framework to model refinements in values and prove a value-of-information theorem for axiological refinement.<n>In multi-agent settings, we establish that mutual refinement will characteristically transform zero-sum games into positive-sum interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T19:06:30Z)
• Modal Logic for Stratified Becoming: Actualization Beyond Possible Worlds [55.2480439325792]
  This article develops a novel framework for modal logic based on the idea of stratified actualization.<n>Traditional Kripke semantics treat modal operators as quantification over fully determinate alternatives.<n>We propose a system Stratified Actualization Logic (SAL) in which modalities are indexed by levels of ontological stability, interpreted as admissibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T18:35:01Z)
• Theory-Independent Context Incompatibility: Quantification and Experimental Demonstration [0.0]
  Concept of compatibility originally emerged as a synonym for the commutativity of observables and later evolved into the notion of measurement compatibility. Recently, still within the quantum domain, the concept of context incompatibility has been proposed as a resource for detecting eavesdropping in quantum communication channels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T19:34:00Z)
• Collective motion from quantum-inspired dynamics in visual perception [6.180313500709727]
  We propose a model of collective behavior in self-propelled active agents that incorporates a perceptual decision-making process.<n>We suggest that in this framework, the force driving the movement of active agents is governed by the quantum average of its perception operator.<n>Our model demonstrates that, with an appropriate choice of perceptual decision state, the well-known Vicsek model of flocking behavior can be derived.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T11:16:25Z)
• On the Role of Entity and Event Level Conceptualization in Generalizable Reasoning: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, Applications, and Future Directions [62.06913340614293]
  This paper proposes a categorization of different types of conceptualizations into four levels based on the types of instances being conceptualized.<n>We present the first comprehensive survey of over 150 papers, surveying various definitions, resources, methods, and downstream applications related to conceptualization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T10:32:41Z)
• Bayesian Theory of Consciousness as Exchangeable Emotion-Cognition Inference [5.234742752529437]
  This paper proposes a unified framework in which consciousness emerges as a cycle-consistent, affectively anchored inference process.<n>We formalize emotion as a low-dimensional structural prior and cognition as a specificity-instantiating update.<n>This emotion-cognition cycle minimizes joint uncertainty by aligning emotionally weighted priors with context-sensitive cognitive appraisals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T17:06:19Z)
• Improving Intervention Efficacy via Concept Realignment in Concept Bottleneck Models [57.86303579812877]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) ground image classification on human-understandable concepts to allow for interpretable model decisions. Existing approaches often require numerous human interventions per image to achieve strong performances. We introduce a trainable concept realignment intervention module, which leverages concept relations to realign concept assignments post-intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:59:01Z)
• Equivalence Relations in Quantum Theory: An Objective Account of Bases and Factorizations [0.0]
  In orthodox Standard Quantum Mechanics (SQM) bases and factorizations are considered to define quantum states and entanglement in relativistic terms. We provide an invariant account of bases and factorizations which allows us to build a conceptual-operational bridge between formalism and quantum phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T10:17:49Z)
• Relaxation of first-class constraints and the quantization of gauge theories: from "matter without matter" to the reappearance of time in quantum gravity [72.27323884094953]
  We make a conceptual overview of an approach to the initial-value problem in canonical gauge theories. We stress how the first-class phase-space constraints may be relaxed if we interpret them as fixing the values of new degrees of freedom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T19:00:02Z)
• A Semantic Approach to Decidability in Epistemic Planning (Extended Version) [72.77805489645604]
  We use a novel semantic approach to achieve decidability. Specifically, we augment the logic of knowledge S5$_n$ and with an interaction axiom called (knowledge) commutativity. We prove that our framework admits a finitary non-fixpoint characterization of common knowledge, which is of independent interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T11:26:26Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
  We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality. Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z)
• Unifying different notions of quantum incompatibility into a strict hierarchy of resource theories of communication [60.18814584837969]
  We introduce the notion of q-compatibility, which unifies different notions of POVMs, channels, and instruments incompatibility. We are able to pinpoint exactly what each notion of incompatibility consists of, in terms of information-theoretic resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T21:33:31Z)
• Towards a Grounded Theory of Causation for Embodied AI [12.259552039796027]
  Existing frameworks give no indication as to which behaviour policies or physical transformations of state space shall count as interventions. The framework sketched in this paper describes actions as transformations of state space, for instance induced by an agent running a policy. This makes it possible to describe in a uniform way both transformations of the micro-state space and abstract models thereof.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T12:56:43Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum Cognitively Motivated Decision Fusion for Video Sentiment Analysis [22.701975963984378]
  We show that the sentiment judgment from one modality could be incompatible with the judgment from another. We propose a fundamentally new, quantum cognitively motivated fusion strategy for predicting sentiment judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-12T11:06:04Z)
• QuLBIT: Quantum-Like Bayesian Inference Technologies for Cognition and Decision [0.11470070927586014]
  This paper provides the foundations of a unified cognitive decision-making framework (QulBIT) which is derived from quantum theory. We detail the main modules of the unified framework, the explanatory analysis method, and illustrate their application in situations violating the Sure Thing Principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-30T09:02:03Z)
• Giving Operational Meaning to the Superposition of Causal Orders [0.0]
  This work fits within a recent effort to understand how the standard operational perspective on quantum theory could be extended to indefinite causality. We investigate how the concept of indefiniteness emerges from specific characteristics of generic operational theories. To validate our framework, we show how salient examples from the literature can be captured in our framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-30T09:55:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.