Qualitative Research Methods in Software Engineering: Past, Present, and Future
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07220v1
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 03:25:58 GMT
- Title: Qualitative Research Methods in Software Engineering: Past, Present, and Future
- Authors: Carolyn Seaman, Rashina Hoda, Robert Feldt,
- Abstract summary: The paper "Qualitative Methods in Empirical Studies of Software Engineering" was published in TSE in 1999.<n>It has been chosen as one of the most influential papers from the third decade of TSE's 50 years history.
- Score: 15.223983256335426
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: The paper entitled "Qualitative Methods in Empirical Studies of Software Engineering" by Carolyn Seaman was published in TSE in 1999. It has been chosen as one of the most influential papers from the third decade of TSE's 50 years history. In this retrospective, the authors discuss the evolution of the use of qualitative methods in software engineering research, the impact it's had on research and practice, and reflections on what is coming and deserves attention.
Related papers
- Toward a Brazilian Research Agenda in Quantum Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study [0.0]
Quantum Software Engineering (QSE) has emerged as a promising discipline to support the development of quantum applications.<n>Despite recent growth, QSE still lacks standardized methodologies, tools, and guidelines.<n>This study aims to map the current state of QSE by identifying research trends, contributions, and gaps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-29T00:19:53Z) - Optimizing Research Portfolio For Semantic Impact [55.2480439325792]
Citation metrics are widely used to assess academic impact but suffer from social biases.
We introduce rXiv Semantic Impact (XSI), a novel framework that predicts research impact.
XSI tracks the evolution of research concepts in the academic knowledge graph.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-19T17:44:13Z) - "Estimating software project effort using analogies": Reflections after 28 years [0.0]
The paper examines (i) what was achieved, (ii) what has endured and (iii) what could have been done differently with the benefit of retrospection.<n>The original study emphasised empirical validation with benchmarks, out-of-sample testing and data/tool sharing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-24T15:44:25Z) - A Call for Critically Rethinking and Reforming Data Analysis in Empirical Software Engineering [5.687882380471718]
Concerns about the correct application of empirical methodologies have existed since the 2006 Dagstuhl seminar on Empirical Software Engineering.
We conducted a literature survey of 27,000 empirical studies, using LLMs to classify statistical methodologies as adequate or inadequate.
We selected 30 primary studies and held a workshop with 33 ESE experts to assess their ability to identify and resolve statistical issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-22T09:05:01Z) - MASSW: A New Dataset and Benchmark Tasks for AI-Assisted Scientific Workflows [58.56005277371235]
We introduce MASSW, a comprehensive text dataset on Multi-Aspect Summarization of ScientificAspects.
MASSW includes more than 152,000 peer-reviewed publications from 17 leading computer science conferences spanning the past 50 years.
We demonstrate the utility of MASSW through multiple novel machine-learning tasks that can be benchmarked using this new dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T15:19:09Z) - A Perspective Analysis of Handwritten Signature Technology [7.193142573563886]
Handwritten signatures are biometric traits at the center of debate in the scientific community.
This perspective reports a systematic review of the last 10 years of the literature on handwritten signatures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-22T11:41:19Z) - De-identification of clinical free text using natural language
processing: A systematic review of current approaches [48.343430343213896]
Natural language processing has repeatedly demonstrated its feasibility in automating the de-identification process.
Our study aims to provide systematic evidence on how the de-identification of clinical free text has evolved in the last thirteen years.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-28T13:20:41Z) - Impression-Aware Recommender Systems [53.48892326556546]
We present a systematic literature review on recommender systems using impressions.<n>We define a theoretical framework to delimit recommender systems using impressions and a novel paradigm for personalized recommendations, called impression-aware recommender systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T16:16:02Z) - Application of Transformers based methods in Electronic Medical Records:
A Systematic Literature Review [77.34726150561087]
This work presents a systematic literature review of state-of-the-art advances using transformer-based methods on electronic medical records (EMRs) in different NLP tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-05T22:19:42Z) - Artificial Intelligence in Concrete Materials: A Scientometric View [77.34726150561087]
This chapter aims to uncover the main research interests and knowledge structure of the existing literature on AI for concrete materials.
To begin with, a total of 389 journal articles published from 1990 to 2020 were retrieved from the Web of Science.
Scientometric tools such as keyword co-occurrence analysis and documentation co-citation analysis were adopted to quantify features and characteristics of the research field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-17T18:24:56Z) - A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learning [83.47804123133719]
The last decade has seen a surge of research in this area due to the unprecedented success of deep learning.
This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches from 1961 to 2021.
We create a taxonomy for text classification according to the text involved and the models used for feature extraction and classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-02T00:09:03Z) - The First 50 Years of Software Reliability Engineering: A History of SRE with First Person Accounts [0.0]
Software Reliability has just passed the 50-year milestone as a technical discipline along with Software Engineering.<n>This paper traces the roots of Software Reliability Engineering from its pre-software history to the beginnings of the field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-02-16T19:22:38Z) - Qualitative software engineering research -- reflections and guidelines [18.630596256915794]
We present an overview of three qualitative methods commonly used in social sciences but rarely seen in software engineering research.
Our paper will help software engineering researchers better select and then guide the application of a broader set of qualitative research methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2017-12-22T08:40:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.