Europe's AI Imperative - A Pragmatic Blueprint for Global Tech Leadership

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08781v2
• Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 17:53:51 GMT
• Title: Europe's AI Imperative - A Pragmatic Blueprint for Global Tech Leadership
• Authors: Gjergji Kasneci, Urs Gasser, Thomas F. Hofmann, Gerhard Kramer, Gerhard Müller, Claudia Peus, Helmut Schönenberger, Enkelejda Kasneci,
• Abstract summary: Europe is at a make-or-break moment in the global AI race, squeezed between the US and China. We present a sharp, doable strategy that builds upon Europe's strengths and closes gaps.
• Score: 16.711035492718356
• License:
• Abstract: Europe is at a make-or-break moment in the global AI race, squeezed between the massive venture capital and tech giants in the US and China's scale-oriented, top-down drive. At this tipping point, where the convergence of AI with complementary and synergistic technologies, like quantum computing, biotech, VR/AR, 5G/6G, robotics, advanced materials, and high-performance computing, could upend geopolitical balances, Europe needs to rethink its AI-related strategy. On the heels of the AI Action Summit 2025 in Paris, we present a sharp, doable strategy that builds upon Europe's strengths and closes gaps.

Related papers

• Shaping AI's Impact on Billions of Lives [27.78474296888659]
  We argue for the community of AI practitioners to consciously and proactively work for the common good. This paper offers a blueprint for a new type of innovation infrastructure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T16:29:37Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences. First, it is not sustainable, as its compute demands increase faster than model performance, leading to unreasonable economic requirements and a disproportionate environmental footprint. Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology [50.586585729683776]
  Governments globally are grappling with the challenge of regulating GenAI, balancing innovation against safety. A workshop co-organized by Google, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Stanford University aimed to bridge this gap between GenAI policy and technology. This paper summarizes the discussions during the workshop which addressed questions, such as: How regulation can be designed without hindering technological progress?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T20:30:01Z)
• Deliberative Technology for Alignment [0.0]
  Deliberative technology is already being used across these institutions to help align governance with human will. The race to superhuman AGI is already underway, and the AI systems it gives rise to may become the most powerful systems of the future. Right now, there is a window of opportunity to use deliberative technology to align the impact of powerful AI with the will of humanity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-06T20:34:32Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• A Game-Theoretic Framework for AI Governance [8.658519485150423]
  We show that the strategic interaction between the regulatory agencies and AI firms has an intrinsic structure reminiscent of a Stackelberg game. We propose a game-theoretic modeling framework for AI governance. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to use game theory for analyzing and structuring AI governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T08:18:42Z)
• ChatGPT, Large Language Technologies, and the Bumpy Road of Benefiting Humanity [2.28438857884398]
  The promise that AI technologies will benefit all of humanity is empty so long as we lack a nuanced understanding of what humanity is supposed to be in the face of widening global inequality and pressing existential threats. We also need to develop standards in a sustainable and equitable way that differentiate between merely speculative and well-researched questions. Failure to do so could result in a future in which our AI technological advancements outstrip our ability to navigate their ethical and social implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T22:53:45Z)
• Future Computer Systems and Networking Research in the Netherlands: A Manifesto [137.47124933818066]
  We draw attention to CompSys as a vital part of ICT. Each of the Top Sectors of the Dutch Economy, each route in the National Research Agenda, and each of the UN Sustainable Development Goals pose challenges that cannot be addressed without CompSys advances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T11:02:29Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• European Strategy on AI: Are we truly fostering social good? [1.7849339006560667]
  The European Commission introduced its AI strategy able to compete in the next years with world powers such as China and US. Most of the Member States have published their own National Strategy with the aim to work on a coordinated plan for Europe. This paper reports the main findings of a qualitative analysis of the investment plans reported in 15 European National Strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-25T16:39:12Z)
• The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
  Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI. Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.