Machine Learning-Driven Convergence Analysis in Multijurisdictional Compliance Using BERT and K-Means Clustering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10413v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 22:11:18 GMT
• Title: Machine Learning-Driven Convergence Analysis in Multijurisdictional Compliance Using BERT and K-Means Clustering
• Authors: Raj Sonani, Lohalekar Prayas,
• Abstract summary: This study compares various regulations to identify areas where they overlap or diverge.<n>International companies can learn valuable lessons from this report.<n>The study's objective is to "bridge the gap between legal knowledge and technical expertise"
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Digital data continues to grow, there has been a shift towards using effective regulatory mechanisms to safeguard personal information. The CCPA of California and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union are two of the most important privacy laws. The regulation is intended to safeguard consumer privacy, but it varies greatly in scope, definitions, and methods of enforcement. This paper presents a fresh approach to adaptive compliance, using machine learning and emphasizing natural language processing (NLP) as the primary focus of comparison between the GDPR and CCPA. Using NLP, this study compares various regulations to identify areas where they overlap or diverge. This includes the "right to be forgotten" provision in the GDPR and the "opt-out of sale" provision under CCPA. International companies can learn valuable lessons from this report, as it outlines strategies for better enforcement of laws across different nations. Additionally, the paper discusses the challenges of utilizing NLP in legal literature and proposes methods to enhance the model-ability of machine learning models for studying regulations. The study's objective is to "bridge the gap between legal knowledge and technical expertise" by developing regulatory compliance strategies that are more efficient in operation and more effective in data protection.

Related papers

• Privacy-Preserving Customer Support: A Framework for Secure and Scalable Interactions [0.0]
  This paper introduces the Privacy-Preserving Zero-Shot Learning (PP-ZSL) framework, a novel approach leveraging large language models (LLMs) in a zero-shot learning mode.<n>Unlike conventional machine learning methods, PP-ZSL eliminates the need for local training on sensitive data by utilizing pre-trained LLMs to generate responses directly.<n>The framework incorporates real-time data anonymization to redact or mask sensitive information, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for domain-specific query resolution, and robust post-processing to ensure compliance with regulatory standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T17:20:47Z)
• Enhancing Legal Compliance and Regulation Analysis with Large Language Models [0.0]
  This research explores the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) to accurately classify legal provisions and automate compliance checks. Our findings demonstrate promising results, indicating LLMs' significant potential to enhance legal compliance and regulatory analysis efficiency, notably by reducing manual workload and improving accuracy within reasonable time financial constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T16:40:49Z)
• Rethinking Legal Compliance Automation: Opportunities with Large Language Models [2.9088208525097365]
  We argue that the examination of (textual) legal artifacts should, first employ broader context than sentences. We present a compliance analysis approach designed to address these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T17:10:27Z)
• Towards an Enforceable GDPR Specification [49.1574468325115]
  Privacy by Design (PbD) is prescribed by modern privacy regulations such as the EU's. One emerging technique to realize PbD is enforcement (RE) We present a set of requirements and an iterative methodology for creating formal specifications of legal provisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T09:38:51Z)
• Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaboration [52.57055162778548]
  Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) has become an increasingly crucial task in Legal AI. Precedents are the previous legal cases with similar facts, which are the basis for the judgment of the subsequent case in national legal systems. Recent advances in deep learning have enabled a variety of techniques to be used to solve the LJP task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T16:47:20Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• Theoretically Principled Federated Learning for Balancing Privacy and Utility [61.03993520243198]
  We propose a general learning framework for the protection mechanisms that protects privacy via distorting model parameters. It can achieve personalized utility-privacy trade-off for each model parameter, on each client, at each communication round in federated learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T13:44:02Z)
• Analysing similarities between legal court documents using natural language processing approaches based on Transformers [0.0]
  This work targets the problem of detecting the degree of similarity between judicial documents that can be achieved in the inference group. It applies six NLP techniques based on the transformers architecture to a case study of legal proceedings in the Brazilian judicial system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-14T18:25:56Z)
• Distributed Machine Learning and the Semblance of Trust [66.1227776348216]
  Federated Learning (FL) allows the data owner to maintain data governance and perform model training locally without having to share their data. FL and related techniques are often described as privacy-preserving. We explain why this term is not appropriate and outline the risks associated with over-reliance on protocols that were not designed with formal definitions of privacy in mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:44:05Z)
• Learning to Limit Data Collection via Scaling Laws: Data Minimization Compliance in Practice [62.44110411199835]
  We build on literature in machine learning law to propose framework for limiting collection based on data interpretation that ties data to system performance. We formalize a data minimization criterion based on performance curve derivatives and provide an effective and interpretable piecewise power law technique.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-16T19:59:01Z)
• Towards Automatic Comparison of Data Privacy Documents: A Preliminary Experiment on GDPR-like Laws [1.3537117504260623]
  General Data Protection Regulation (NLP) becomes standard law for protection in many countries. 12 countries adopt their similarities-like regulations, but evaluating differences is time-consuming and needs manual effort from legal experts. In this paper, we investigate a simple natural language processing (NLP) approach to tackle the problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-21T03:59:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.