Assessing the Trustworthiness of Electronic Identity Management Systems: Framework and Insights from Inception to Deployment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10771v1
• Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 11:26:30 GMT
• Title: Assessing the Trustworthiness of Electronic Identity Management Systems: Framework and Insights from Inception to Deployment
• Authors: Mirko Bottarelli, Gregory Epiphaniou, Shah Mahmood, Mark Hooper, Carsten Maple,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces an integrated Digital Identity Systems Trustworthiness Assessment Framework (DISTAF) It is supported by over 65 mechanisms and over 400 metrics derived from international standards and technical guidelines. We demonstrate the application of DISTAF through a real-world implementation using a Modular Open Source Identity Platform (MOSIP) instance.
• Score: 9.132025152225447
• License:
• Abstract: The growing dependence on Electronic Identity Management Systems (EIDS) and recent advancements, such as non-human ID management, require a thorough evaluation of their trustworthiness. Assessing EIDS's trustworthiness ensures security, privacy, and reliability in managing sensitive user information. It safeguards against fraud, unauthorised access, and data breaches, fostering user confidence. Existing frameworks primarily focus on specific dimensions such as security and privacy, often neglecting critical dimensions such as ethics, resilience, robustness, and reliability. This paper introduces an integrated Digital Identity Systems Trustworthiness Assessment Framework (DISTAF) encapsulating these six pillars. It is supported by over 65 mechanisms and over 400 metrics derived from international standards and technical guidelines. By addressing the lifecycle of DIMS from design to deployment, our DISTAF evaluates trustworthiness at granular levels while remaining accessible to diverse stakeholders. We demonstrate the application of DISTAF through a real-world implementation using a Modular Open Source Identity Platform (MOSIP) instance, refining its metrics to simplify trustworthiness assessment. Our approach introduces clustering mechanisms for metrics, hierarchical scoring, and mandatory criteria to ensure robust and consistent evaluations across an EIDS in both the design and operation stages. Furthermore, DISTAF is adaptable to emerging technologies like Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI), integrating privacy-enhancing techniques and ethical considerations to meet modern challenges. The assessment tool developed alongside DISTAF provides a user-centric methodology and a simplified yet effective self-assessment process, enabling system designers and assessors to identify system gaps, improve configurations, and enhance public trust.

Related papers

• On the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models: Guideline, Assessment, and Perspective [314.7991906491166]
  Generative Foundation Models (GenFMs) have emerged as transformative tools. Their widespread adoption raises critical concerns regarding trustworthiness across dimensions. This paper presents a comprehensive framework to address these challenges through three key contributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T06:20:36Z)
• Distributed Identity for Zero Trust and Segmented Access Control: A Novel Approach to Securing Network Infrastructure [4.169915659794567]
  This study assesses security improvements achieved when distributed identity is employed with ZTA principle. The study suggests adopting distributed identities can enhance overall security postures by an order of magnitude. The research recommends refining technical standards, expanding the use of distributed identity in practice, and its applications for the contemporary digital security landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T00:02:02Z)
• Powering LLM Regulation through Data: Bridging the Gap from Compute Thresholds to Customer Experiences [0.0]
  This paper argues that current regulatory approaches, which focus on compute-level thresholds and generalized model evaluations, are insufficient to ensure the safety and effectiveness of specific LLM-based user experiences. We propose a shift towards a certification process centered on actual user-facing experiences and the curation of high-quality datasets for evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-12T16:20:40Z)
• Know Where You're Uncertain When Planning with Multimodal Foundation Models: A Formal Framework [54.40508478482667]
  We present a comprehensive framework to disentangle, quantify, and mitigate uncertainty in perception and plan generation. We propose methods tailored to the unique properties of perception and decision-making. We show that our uncertainty disentanglement framework reduces variability by up to 40% and enhances task success rates by 5% compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T17:32:00Z)
• Meta-Sealing: A Revolutionizing Integrity Assurance Protocol for Transparent, Tamper-Proof, and Trustworthy AI System [0.0]
  This research introduces Meta-Sealing, a cryptographic framework that fundamentally changes integrity verification in AI systems. The framework combines advanced cryptography with distributed verification, delivering tamper-evident guarantees that achieve both mathematical rigor and computational efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T15:31:22Z)
• Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey [59.26328612791924]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has quickly grown into a pivotal paradigm in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose a unified framework that assesses the trustworthiness of RAG systems across six key dimensions: factuality, robustness, fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T09:06:44Z)
• Trustworthiness for an Ultra-Wideband Localization Service [2.4979362117484714]
  This paper proposes a holistic trustworthiness assessment framework for ultra-wideband self-localization. Our goal is to provide guidance for evaluating a system's trustworthiness based on objective evidence. Our approach guarantees that the resulting trustworthiness indicators correspond to chosen real-world threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-10T11:57:10Z)
• Towards Secure and Private AI: A Framework for Decentralized Inference [14.526663289437584]
  Large multimodal foundational models present challenges in scalability, reliability, and potential misuse. Decentralized systems offer a solution by distributing workload and mitigating central points of failure. We address these challenges with a comprehensive framework designed for responsible AI development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-28T05:09:17Z)
• Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs [54.262044436203965]
  We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models. It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T09:03:18Z)
• Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspective [56.80107647520364]
  We draw from communication theories and literature on trust in technologies to develop a conceptual model called MATCH. We highlight transparency and interaction as AI systems' affordances that present a wide range of trustworthiness cues to users. We propose a checklist of requirements to help technology creators identify appropriate cues to use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T00:14:33Z)
• Trustworthy AI [75.99046162669997]
  Brittleness to minor adversarial changes in the input data, ability to explain the decisions, address the bias in their training data, are some of the most prominent limitations. We propose the tutorial on Trustworthy AI to address six critical issues in enhancing user and public trust in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T20:04:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.