Smoothing Out Hallucinations: Mitigating LLM Hallucination with Smoothed Knowledge Distillation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11306v1
• Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 23:05:36 GMT
• Title: Smoothing Out Hallucinations: Mitigating LLM Hallucination with Smoothed Knowledge Distillation
• Authors: Hieu Nguyen, Zihao He, Shoumik Atul Gandre, Ujjwal Pasupulety, Sharanya Kumari Shivakumar, Kristina Lerman,
• Abstract summary: We propose mitigating hallucination through knowledge distillation (KD)<n>KD provides smoothed soft labels to a student model, reducing overconfidence and improving factual grounding.<n> Experimental results on summarization benchmarks demonstrate that KD reduces hallucination compared to standard finetuning.
• Score: 5.9079338934481225
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucination, generating factually incorrect or ungrounded content, which limits their reliability in high-stakes applications. A key factor contributing to hallucination is the use of hard labels during training, which enforce deterministic supervision, encourage overconfidence, and disregard the uncertainty inherent in natural language. To address this, we propose mitigating hallucination through knowledge distillation (KD), where a teacher model provides smoothed soft labels to a student model, reducing overconfidence and improving factual grounding. We apply KD during supervised finetuning on instructional data, evaluating its effectiveness across LLMs from different families. Experimental results on summarization benchmarks demonstrate that KD reduces hallucination compared to standard finetuning while preserving performance on general NLP tasks. These findings highlight KD as a promising approach for mitigating hallucination in LLMs and improving model reliability.

Related papers

• Triggering Hallucinations in LLMs: A Quantitative Study of Prompt-Induced Hallucination in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) present a growing challenge across real-world applications. We propose a prompt-based framework to systematically trigger and quantify hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T14:33:47Z)
• HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmark [49.170128733508335]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate responses that deviate from user input or training data, a phenomenon known as "hallucination" This paper introduces a comprehensive hallucination benchmark, incorporating both new extrinsic and existing intrinsic evaluation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T13:40:27Z)
• Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Internal Fact-based Contrastive Decoding [5.424048651554831]
  Internal Fact-based Contrastive Decoding (IFCD) is designed to mitigate and suppress hallucinations during the inference process of Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs)<n>IFCD calibrates the LVLMs' output and effectively removes the hallucinatory logits from the final predictions.<n> Experimental results validate that IFCD significantly alleviates both object-level and attribute-level hallucinations while achieving an average 9% accuracy improvement on POPE and 8% accuracy improvement on MME object hallucinations subset compared with direct decoding, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T05:08:35Z)
• Hallucination Detox: Sensitivity Dropout (SenD) for Large Language Model Training [7.726825072908519]
  This research investigates the relationship between the training process and the emergence of hallucinations.<n>We introduce Sensitivity Dropout (SenD), a novel training protocol designed to mitigate hallucinations by reducing variance during training.<n>In addition, we develop an unsupervised hallucination detection metric, Efficient EigenScore (EES), which approximates the traditional EigenScore at 2x speed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T18:18:23Z)
• Hallucination Detection: Robustly Discerning Reliable Answers in Large Language Models [70.19081534515371]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption in various natural language processing tasks. They generate unfaithful or inconsistent content that deviates from the input source, leading to severe consequences. We propose a robust discriminator named RelD to effectively detect hallucination in LLMs' generated answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T18:47:42Z)
• Hallucination Diversity-Aware Active Learning for Text Summarization [46.00645048690819]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown propensity to generate hallucinated outputs, i.e., texts that are factually incorrect or unsupported. Existing methods for alleviating hallucinations typically require costly human annotations to identify and correct hallucinations in LLM outputs. We propose the first active learning framework to alleviate LLM hallucinations, reducing costly human annotations of hallucination needed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T02:30:27Z)
• Knowledge Verification to Nip Hallucination in the Bud [69.79051730580014]
  We demonstrate the feasibility of mitigating hallucinations by verifying and minimizing the inconsistency between external knowledge present in the alignment data and the intrinsic knowledge embedded within foundation LLMs. We propose a novel approach called Knowledge Consistent Alignment (KCA), which employs a well-aligned LLM to automatically formulate assessments based on external knowledge. We demonstrate the superior efficacy of KCA in reducing hallucinations across six benchmarks, utilizing foundation LLMs of varying backbones and scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T15:39:49Z)
• Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinations [67.35512483340837]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been observed to generate responses that include inaccurate or fabricated information. We propose a simple textitInduce-then-Contrast Decoding (ICD) strategy to alleviate hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-25T12:32:49Z)
• Enhancing Uncertainty-Based Hallucination Detection with Stronger Focus [99.33091772494751]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant popularity for their impressive performance across diverse fields. LLMs are prone to hallucinate untruthful or nonsensical outputs that fail to meet user expectations. We propose a novel reference-free, uncertainty-based method for detecting hallucinations in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T08:39:17Z)
• HalluciDoctor: Mitigating Hallucinatory Toxicity in Visual Instruction Data [102.56792377624927]
  hallucinations inherent in machine-generated data remain under-explored. We present a novel hallucination detection and elimination framework, HalluciDoctor, based on the cross-checking paradigm. Our method successfully mitigates 44.6% hallucinations relatively and maintains competitive performance compared to LLaVA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T04:52:58Z)
• Contrastive Learning Reduces Hallucination in Conversations [76.55116206021346]
  We propose a contrastive learning scheme, named MixCL. A novel mixed contrastive objective is proposed to explicitly optimize the implicit knowledge elicitation process of LMs. We show that MixCL achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art KB-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T16:26:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.