On the Robust Approximation of ASR Metrics
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12408v1
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 01:10:17 GMT
- Title: On the Robust Approximation of ASR Metrics
- Authors: Abdul Waheed, Hanin Atwany, Rita Singh, Bhiksha Raj,
- Abstract summary: We propose a novel approach for approximating ASR performance metrics, eliminating the need for ground truth labels.
Our method utilizes multimodal embeddings in a unified space for speech and transcription representations, combined with a high-quality proxy model to compute proxy metrics.
Our results show that we approximate the metrics within a single-digit absolute difference across all experimental configurations, outperforming the most recent baseline by more than 50%.
- Score: 30.524282767961463
- License:
- Abstract: Recent advances in speech foundation models are largely driven by scaling both model size and data, enabling them to perform a wide range of tasks, including speech recognition. Traditionally, ASR models are evaluated using metrics like Word Error Rate (WER) and Character Error Rate (CER), which depend on ground truth labels. As a result of limited labeled data from diverse domains and testing conditions, the true generalization capabilities of these models beyond standard benchmarks remain unclear. Moreover, labeling data is both costly and time-consuming. To address this, we propose a novel label-free approach for approximating ASR performance metrics, eliminating the need for ground truth labels. Our method utilizes multimodal embeddings in a unified space for speech and transcription representations, combined with a high-quality proxy model to compute proxy metrics. These features are used to train a regression model to predict key ASR metrics like Word Error Rate (WER) and Character Error Rate (CER). We experiment with over 40 models across 14 datasets representing both standard and in-the-wild testing conditions. Our results show that we approximate the metrics within a single-digit absolute difference across all experimental configurations, outperforming the most recent baseline by more than 50\%.
Related papers
- LiveXiv -- A Multi-Modal Live Benchmark Based on Arxiv Papers Content [62.816876067499415]
We propose LiveXiv: a scalable evolving live benchmark based on scientific ArXiv papers.
LiveXiv accesses domain-specific manuscripts at any given timestamp and proposes to automatically generate visual question-answer pairs.
We benchmark multiple open and proprietary Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) on the first version of our benchmark, showing its challenging nature and exposing the models true abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T17:51:23Z) - ANLS* -- A Universal Document Processing Metric for Generative Large Language Models [40.94659575657584]
This paper introduces a new metric for evaluating generative models called ANLS*.
The ANLS* metric extends existing ANLS metrics as a drop-in-replacement and is still compatible with previously reported ANLS scores.
We also benchmark a novel approach to generate prompts for documents, called SFT, against other prompting techniques such as LATIN.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T09:50:08Z) - Machine Translation Meta Evaluation through Translation Accuracy
Challenge Sets [92.38654521870444]
We introduce ACES, a contrastive challenge set spanning 146 language pairs.
This dataset aims to discover whether metrics can identify 68 translation accuracy errors.
We conduct a large-scale study by benchmarking ACES on 50 metrics submitted to the WMT 2022 and 2023 metrics shared tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T17:17:42Z) - Preserving Knowledge Invariance: Rethinking Robustness Evaluation of Open Information Extraction [49.15931834209624]
We present the first benchmark that simulates the evaluation of open information extraction models in the real world.
We design and annotate a large-scale testbed in which each example is a knowledge-invariant clique.
By further elaborating the robustness metric, a model is judged to be robust if its performance is consistently accurate on the overall cliques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T12:05:09Z) - BUMP: A Benchmark of Unfaithful Minimal Pairs for Meta-Evaluation of
Faithfulness Metrics [70.52570641514146]
We present a benchmark of unfaithful minimal pairs (BUMP)
BUMP is a dataset of 889 human-written, minimally different summary pairs.
Unlike non-pair-based datasets, BUMP can be used to measure the consistency of metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-20T02:17:30Z) - Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers,
Datasets, Error Detectors [105.12462629663757]
In this work, we aggregate factuality error annotations from nine existing datasets and stratify them according to the underlying summarization model.
We compare performance of state-of-the-art factuality metrics, including recent ChatGPT-based metrics, on this stratified benchmark and show that their performance varies significantly across different types of summarization models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-25T15:26:48Z) - Evaluation of HTR models without Ground Truth Material [2.4792948967354236]
evaluation of Handwritten Text Recognition models during their development is straightforward.
But the evaluation process becomes tricky as soon as we switch from development to application.
We show that lexicon-based evaluation can compete with lexicon-based methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-17T01:26:09Z) - Constructing interval variables via faceted Rasch measurement and
multitask deep learning: a hate speech application [63.10266319378212]
We propose a method for measuring complex variables on a continuous, interval spectrum by combining supervised deep learning with the Constructing Measures approach to faceted Rasch item response theory (IRT)
We demonstrate this new method on a dataset of 50,000 social media comments sourced from YouTube, Twitter, and Reddit and labeled by 11,000 U.S.-based Amazon Mechanical Turk workers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-22T02:15:05Z) - Meta-Learned Confidence for Few-shot Learning [60.6086305523402]
A popular transductive inference technique for few-shot metric-based approaches, is to update the prototype of each class with the mean of the most confident query examples.
We propose to meta-learn the confidence for each query sample, to assign optimal weights to unlabeled queries.
We validate our few-shot learning model with meta-learned confidence on four benchmark datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T10:22:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.