AI Software Engineer: Programming with Trust

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13767v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 14:28:42 GMT
• Title: AI Software Engineer: Programming with Trust
• Authors: Abhik Roychoudhury, Corina Pasareanu, Michael Pradel, Baishakhi Ray,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown surprising proficiency in generating code snippets. We argue that successfully deploying AI software engineers requires a level of trust equal to or even greater than the trust established by human-driven software engineering practices.
• Score: 33.88230182444934
• License:
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown surprising proficiency in generating code snippets, promising to automate large parts of software engineering via artificial intelligence (AI). We argue that successfully deploying AI software engineers requires a level of trust equal to or even greater than the trust established by human-driven software engineering practices. The recent trend toward LLM agents offers a path toward integrating the power of LLMs to create new code with the power of analysis tools to increase trust in the code. This opinion piece comments on whether LLM agents could dominate software engineering workflows in the future and whether the focus of programming will shift from programming at scale to programming with trust.

Related papers

• Exploring Code Language Models for Automated HLS-based Hardware Generation: Benchmark, Infrastructure and Analysis [49.998130983414924]
  Large language models (LLMs) can be employed for programming languages such as Python and C++. This paper explores leveraging LLMs to generate High-Level Synthesis (HLS)-based hardware design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T17:53:59Z)
• Analysis of Student-LLM Interaction in a Software Engineering Project [1.2233362977312945]
  We analyze 126 undergraduate students' interaction with an AI assistant during a 13-week semester to understand the benefits of AI for software engineering learning. Our findings suggest that students prefer ChatGPT over CoPilot. conversational-based interaction helps improve the quality of the code generated compared to auto-generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T11:44:00Z)
• Optimizing AI-Assisted Code Generation [0.8901073744693314]
  AI-assisted code-generation tools have significantly transformed software development. The security, reliability, functionality, and quality of the generated code must be guaranteed. This paper examines the implementation of these goals to date and explores strategies to optimize them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-14T20:14:44Z)
• Human-In-the-Loop Software Development Agents [12.830816751625829]
  Large Language Models (LLMs)-based multi-agent paradigms for software engineering are introduced to automatically resolve software development tasks. In this paper, we introduce a Human-in-the-loop LLM-based Agents framework (HULA) for software development. We design, implement, and deploy the HULA framework into Atlassian for internal uses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T23:22:33Z)
• LLMs: A Game-Changer for Software Engineers? [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and GPT-4 have emerged as groundbreaking innovations with capabilities that extend far beyond traditional AI applications. Their potential to revolutionize software development has captivated the software engineering (SE) community. This paper argues that LLMs are not just reshaping how software is developed but are redefining the role of developers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T17:14:37Z)
• Agent-Driven Automatic Software Improvement [55.2480439325792]
  This research proposal aims to explore innovative solutions by focusing on the deployment of agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) The iterative nature of agents, which allows for continuous learning and adaptation, can help surpass common challenges in code generation. We aim to use the iterative feedback in these systems to further fine-tune the LLMs underlying the agents, becoming better aligned to the task of automated software improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T15:45:22Z)
• Morescient GAI for Software Engineering (Extended Version) [2.4861619769660637]
  We present a vision and roadmap for how "Morescient" GAI models can be engineered, evolved and disseminated according to the principles of open science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T07:38:33Z)
• Automatic Programming: Large Language Models and Beyond [48.34544922560503]
  We study concerns around code quality, security and related issues of programmer responsibility. We discuss how advances in software engineering can enable automatic programming. We conclude with a forward looking view, focusing on the programming environment of the near future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T16:19:24Z)
• How Far Have We Gone in Binary Code Understanding Using Large Language Models [51.527805834378974]
  We propose a benchmark to evaluate the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in binary code understanding. Our evaluations reveal that existing LLMs can understand binary code to a certain extent, thereby improving the efficiency of binary code analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T14:44:08Z)
• Enabling Automated Machine Learning for Model-Driven AI Engineering [60.09869520679979]
  We propose a novel approach to enable Model-Driven Software Engineering and Model-Driven AI Engineering. In particular, we support Automated ML, thus assisting software engineers without deep AI knowledge in developing AI-intensive systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-06T10:12:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.