A Survey on Feedback-based Multi-step Reasoning for Large Language Models on Mathematics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14333v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 07:31:00 GMT
• Title: A Survey on Feedback-based Multi-step Reasoning for Large Language Models on Mathematics
• Authors: Ting-Ruen Wei, Haowei Liu, Xuyang Wu, Yi Fang,
• Abstract summary: We present a survey of strategies utilizing feedback at the step and outcome levels to enhance multi-step math reasoning for LLMs. As multi-step reasoning emerges a crucial component in scaling LLMs, we hope to establish its foundation for easier understanding and empower further research.
• Score: 9.681821524089761
• License:
• Abstract: Recent progress in large language models (LLM) found chain-of-thought prompting strategies to improve the reasoning ability of LLMs by encouraging problem solving through multiple steps. Therefore, subsequent research aimed to integrate the multi-step reasoning process into the LLM itself through process rewards as feedback and achieved improvements over prompting strategies. Due to the cost of step-level annotation, some turn to outcome rewards as feedback. Aside from these training-based approaches, training-free techniques leverage frozen LLMs or external tools for feedback at each step to enhance the reasoning process. With the abundance of work in mathematics due to its logical nature, we present a survey of strategies utilizing feedback at the step and outcome levels to enhance multi-step math reasoning for LLMs. As multi-step reasoning emerges a crucial component in scaling LLMs, we hope to establish its foundation for easier understanding and empower further research.

Related papers

• Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approaches [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have succeeded remarkably in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Their ability to perform complex reasoning-spanning logical deduction, mathematical problem-solving, commonsense inference, and multi-step reasoning-often falls short of human expectations. This survey provides a comprehensive review of emerging techniques enhancing reasoning in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T23:31:39Z)
• Satori: Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Action-Thought Enhances LLM Reasoning via Autoregressive Search [57.28671084993782]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities across diverse domains. Recent studies have shown that increasing test-time computation enhances LLMs' reasoning capabilities. We propose a two-stage training paradigm: 1) a small-scale format tuning stage to internalize the COAT reasoning format and 2) a large-scale self-improvement stage leveraging reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T17:26:58Z)
• Can LLMs plan paths with extra hints from solvers? [2.874944508343474]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language processing, mathematical problem solving, and tasks related to program synthesis. This paper explores an approach for enhancing LLM performance in solving a classical robotic planning task by integrating solver-generated feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T14:00:08Z)
• BloomWise: Enhancing Problem-Solving capabilities of Large Language Models using Bloom's-Taxonomy-Inspired Prompts [59.83547898874152]
  We introduce BloomWise, a new prompting technique, inspired by Bloom's taxonomy, to improve the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) The decision regarding the need to employ more sophisticated cognitive skills is based on self-evaluation performed by the LLM. In extensive experiments across 4 popular math reasoning datasets, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T09:27:52Z)
• DOTS: Learning to Reason Dynamically in LLMs via Optimal Reasoning Trajectories Search [37.16633337724158]
  DOTS is an approach enabling LLMs to reason dynamically via optimal reasoning trajectory search. Our method consistently outperforms static reasoning techniques and the vanilla instruction tuning approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T18:58:09Z)
• Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
  LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making. Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations. Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z)
• Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning [53.6472920229013]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks. LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning. We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:08:09Z)
• Can LLMs Solve longer Math Word Problems Better? [47.227621867242]
  Math Word Problems (MWPs) play a vital role in assessing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) The impact of longer contexts on mathematical reasoning remains under-explored. This study pioneers the investigation of Context Length Generalizability (CoLeG)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T17:13:50Z)
• Continual Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey [95.79977915131145]
  Large language models (LLMs) are not amenable to frequent re-training, due to high training costs arising from their massive scale. This paper surveys recent works on continual learning for LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T12:34:09Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Following [54.49567482594617]
  We introduce a challenging meta-evaluation benchmark, LLMBar, designed to test the ability of an LLM evaluator in discerning instruction-following outputs. We discover that different evaluators exhibit distinct performance on LLMBar and even the highest-scoring ones have substantial room for improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T16:38:11Z)
• Fill in the Blank: Exploring and Enhancing LLM Capabilities for Backward Reasoning in Math Word Problems [17.80128896525717]
  backward reasoning is relatively unexplored. backward reasoning can be seen as the ''inverse'' of forward reasoning. We propose variations of three different forward reasoning strategies to improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T12:03:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.