English Please: Evaluating Machine Translation for Multilingual Bug Reports

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14338v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 07:47:03 GMT
• Title: English Please: Evaluating Machine Translation for Multilingual Bug Reports
• Authors: Avinash Patil, Aryan Jadon,
• Abstract summary: This study is the first comprehensive evaluation of machine translation (MT) performance on bug reports. We employ multiple machine translation metrics, including BLEU, BERTScore, COMET, METEOR, and ROUGE. DeepL consistently outperforms the other systems, demonstrating strong lexical and semantic alignment.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Accurate translation of bug reports is critical for efficient collaboration in global software development. In this study, we conduct the first comprehensive evaluation of machine translation (MT) performance on bug reports, analyzing the capabilities of DeepL, AWS Translate, and ChatGPT using data from the Visual Studio Code GitHub repository, specifically focusing on reports labeled with the english-please tag. To thoroughly assess the accuracy and effectiveness of each system, we employ multiple machine translation metrics, including BLEU, BERTScore, COMET, METEOR, and ROUGE. Our findings indicate that DeepL consistently outperforms the other systems across most automatic metrics, demonstrating strong lexical and semantic alignment. AWS Translate performs competitively, particularly in METEOR, while ChatGPT lags in key metrics. This study underscores the importance of domain adaptation for translating technical texts and offers guidance for integrating automated translation into bug-triaging workflows. Moreover, our results establish a foundation for future research to refine machine translation solutions for specialized engineering contexts. The code and dataset for this paper are available at GitHub: https://github.com/av9ash/gitbugs/tree/main/multilingual.

Related papers

• A Data Selection Approach for Enhancing Low Resource Machine Translation Using Cross-Lingual Sentence Representations [0.4499833362998489]
  This study focuses on the case of English-Marathi language pairs, where existing datasets are notably noisy. To mitigate the impact of data quality issues, we propose a data filtering approach based on cross-lingual sentence representations. Results demonstrate a significant improvement in translation quality over the baseline post-filtering with IndicSBERT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T13:49:45Z)
• Evaluating Automatic Metrics with Incremental Machine Translation Systems [55.78547133890403]
  We introduce a dataset comprising commercial machine translations, gathered weekly over six years across 12 translation directions. We assume commercial systems improve over time, which enables us to evaluate machine translation (MT) metrics based on their preference for more recent translations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T17:04:17Z)
• LexMatcher: Dictionary-centric Data Collection for LLM-based Machine Translation [67.24113079928668]
  We present LexMatcher, a method for data curation driven by the coverage of senses found in bilingual dictionaries. Our approach outperforms the established baselines on the WMT2022 test sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T15:30:36Z)
• Lost in the Source Language: How Large Language Models Evaluate the Quality of Machine Translation [64.5862977630713]
  This study investigates how Large Language Models (LLMs) leverage source and reference data in machine translation evaluation task. We find that reference information significantly enhances the evaluation accuracy, while surprisingly, source information sometimes is counterproductive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T13:23:21Z)
• MuLER: Detailed and Scalable Reference-based Evaluation [24.80921931416632]
  We propose a novel methodology that transforms any reference-based evaluation metric for text generation into a fine-grained analysis tool. Given a system and a metric, MuLER quantifies how much the chosen metric penalizes specific error types. We perform experiments in both synthetic and naturalistic settings to support MuLER's validity and showcase its usability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:26:13Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Machine Translation Metrics [78.75776477562087]
  It is unclear if automatic metrics are reliable at distinguishing good translations from bad translations at the sentence level. We evaluate the segment-level performance of the most widely used MT metrics (chrF, COMET, BERTScore, etc.) on three downstream cross-lingual tasks. Our experiments demonstrate that all metrics exhibit negligible correlation with the extrinsic evaluation of the downstream outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T14:39:58Z)
• FRMT: A Benchmark for Few-Shot Region-Aware Machine Translation [64.9546787488337]
  We present FRMT, a new dataset and evaluation benchmark for Few-shot Region-aware Machine Translation. The dataset consists of professional translations from English into two regional variants each of Portuguese and Mandarin Chinese.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-01T05:02:04Z)
• BLEU, METEOR, BERTScore: Evaluation of Metrics Performance in Assessing Critical Translation Errors in Sentiment-oriented Text [1.4213973379473654]
  Machine Translation (MT) of the online content is commonly used to process posts written in several languages. In this paper, we assess the ability of automatic quality metrics to detect critical machine translation errors. We conclude that there is a need for fine-tuning of automatic metrics to make them more robust in detecting sentiment critical errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T07:51:17Z)
• ChrEnTranslate: Cherokee-English Machine Translation Demo with Quality Estimation and Corrective Feedback [70.5469946314539]
  ChrEnTranslate is an online machine translation demonstration system for translation between English and an endangered language Cherokee. It supports both statistical and neural translation models as well as provides quality estimation to inform users of reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-30T17:58:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.