SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation across 285 Graduate Disciplines

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14739v4
• Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:21:44 GMT
• Title: SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation across 285 Graduate Disciplines
• Authors: M-A-P Team, Xinrun Du, Yifan Yao, Kaijing Ma, Bingli Wang, Tianyu Zheng, King Zhu, Minghao Liu, Yiming Liang, Xiaolong Jin, Zhenlin Wei, Chujie Zheng, Kaixin Deng, Shawn Gavin, Shian Jia, Sichao Jiang, Yiyan Liao, Rui Li, Qinrui Li, Sirun Li, Yizhi Li, Yunwen Li, David Ma, Yuansheng Ni, Haoran Que, Qiyao Wang, Zhoufutu Wen, Siwei Wu, Tyshawn Hsing, Ming Xu, Zhenzhu Yang, Zekun Moore Wang, Junting Zhou, Yuelin Bai, Xingyuan Bu, Chenglin Cai, Liang Chen, Yifan Chen, Chengtuo Cheng, Tianhao Cheng, Keyi Ding, Siming Huang, Yun Huang, Yaoru Li, Yizhe Li, Zhaoqun Li, Tianhao Liang, Chengdong Lin, Hongquan Lin, Yinghao Ma, Tianyang Pang, Zhongyuan Peng, Zifan Peng, Qige Qi, Shi Qiu, Xingwei Qu, Shanghaoran Quan, Yizhou Tan, Zili Wang, Chenqing Wang, Hao Wang, Yiya Wang, Yubo Wang, Jiajun Xu, Kexin Yang, Ruibin Yuan, Yuanhao Yue, Tianyang Zhan, Chun Zhang, Jinyang Zhang, Xiyue Zhang, Xingjian Zhang, Yue Zhang, Yongchi Zhao, Xiangyu Zheng, Chenghua Zhong, Yang Gao, Zhoujun Li, Dayiheng Liu, Qian Liu, Tianyu Liu, Shiwen Ni, Junran Peng, Yujia Qin, Wenbo Su, Guoyin Wang, Shi Wang, Jian Yang, Min Yang, Meng Cao, Xiang Yue, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Wangchunshu Zhou, Jiaheng Liu, Qunshu Lin, Wenhao Huang, Ge Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in academic disciplines such as mathematics, physics, and computer science.<n>However, human knowledge encompasses over 200 specialized disciplines, far exceeding the scope of existing benchmarks.<n>We present SuperGPQA, a benchmark that evaluates graduate-level knowledge and reasoning capabilities across 285 disciplines.
• Score: 118.8024915014751
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in mainstream academic disciplines such as mathematics, physics, and computer science. However, human knowledge encompasses over 200 specialized disciplines, far exceeding the scope of existing benchmarks. The capabilities of LLMs in many of these specialized fields-particularly in light industry, agriculture, and service-oriented disciplines-remain inadequately evaluated. To address this gap, we present SuperGPQA, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates graduate-level knowledge and reasoning capabilities across 285 disciplines. Our benchmark employs a novel Human-LLM collaborative filtering mechanism to eliminate trivial or ambiguous questions through iterative refinement based on both LLM responses and expert feedback. Our experimental results reveal significant room for improvement in the performance of current state-of-the-art LLMs across diverse knowledge domains (e.g., the reasoning-focused model DeepSeek-R1 achieved the highest accuracy of 61.82% on SuperGPQA), highlighting the considerable gap between current model capabilities and artificial general intelligence. Additionally, we present comprehensive insights from our management of a large-scale annotation process, involving over 80 expert annotators and an interactive Human-LLM collaborative system, offering valuable methodological guidance for future research initiatives of comparable scope.

Related papers

• A Call for New Recipes to Enhance Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs [85.67171333213301]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in general vision-language tasks. Recent studies have exposed critical limitations in their spatial reasoning capabilities. This deficiency in spatial reasoning significantly constrains MLLMs' ability to interact effectively with the physical world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T11:48:39Z)
• MLRC-Bench: Can Language Agents Solve Machine Learning Research Challenges? [64.62421656031128]
  MLRC-Bench is a benchmark designed to quantify how effectively language agents can tackle challenging Machine Learning (ML) Research Competitions. Unlike prior work, MLRC-Bench measures the key steps of proposing and implementing novel research methods. Even the best-performing tested agent closes only 9.3% of the gap between baseline and top human participant scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-13T19:35:43Z)
• A Survey on Post-training of Large Language Models [185.51013463503946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed natural language processing, making them indispensable across domains ranging from conversational systems to scientific exploration. These challenges necessitate advanced post-training language models (PoLMs) to address shortcomings, such as restricted reasoning capacities, ethical uncertainties, and suboptimal domain-specific performance. This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of PoLMs, systematically tracing their evolution across five core paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T05:41:42Z)
• Injecting Domain-Specific Knowledge into Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey [39.82566660592583]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success in various tasks such as natural language understanding, text summarization, and machine translation.<n>Their general-purpose nature often limits their effectiveness in domain-specific applications that require specialized knowledge, such as healthcare, chemistry, or legal analysis.<n>To address this, researchers have explored diverse methods to enhance LLMs by integrating domain-specific knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T07:43:43Z)
• Humanity's Last Exam [434.8511341499966]
  Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal benchmark at the frontier of human knowledge. It consists of 2,500 questions across dozens of subjects, including mathematics, humanities, and the natural sciences. Each question has a known solution that is unambiguous and easily verifiable, but cannot be quickly answered via internet retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T05:27:46Z)
• Evaluating LLM Reasoning in the Operations Research Domain with ORQA [19.72699080797411]
  We introduce and apply Operations Research Question Answering (ORQA), a new benchmark designed to assess the generalization capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>The dataset features real-world optimization problems that demand multistep reasoning to construct their mathematical models.<n>Our evaluations of various open source LLMs, such as LLaMA 3.1, DeepSeek, and Mixtral, reveal their modest performance, highlighting a gap in their ability to generalize to specialized technical domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-22T09:10:34Z)
• From Generalist to Specialist: Improving Large Language Models for Medical Physics Using ARCoT [0.0]
  ARCoT (Adaptable Retrieval-based Chain of Thought) is a framework designed to enhance the domain-specific accuracy of Large Language Models (LLMs) Our model outperformed standard LLMs and reported average human performance, demonstrating improvements of up to 68%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T18:31:38Z)
• Inadequacies of Large Language Model Benchmarks in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence [5.147767778946168]
  We critically assess 23 state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) benchmarks. Our research uncovered significant limitations, including biases, difficulties in measuring genuine reasoning, adaptability, implementation inconsistencies, prompt engineering complexity, diversity, and the overlooking of cultural and ideological norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T11:08:10Z)
• Domain Specialization as the Key to Make Large Language Models Disruptive: A Comprehensive Survey [100.24095818099522]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the field of natural language processing (NLP) They provide a highly useful, task-agnostic foundation for a wide range of applications. However, directly applying LLMs to solve sophisticated problems in specific domains meets many hurdles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T03:00:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.