Model-Based Exploration in Monitored Markov Decision Processes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16772v1
• Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 01:35:32 GMT
• Title: Model-Based Exploration in Monitored Markov Decision Processes
• Authors: Alireza Kazemipour, Simone Parisi, Matthew E. Taylor, Michael Bowling,
• Abstract summary: Monitored Markov decision processes (Mon-MDPs) have recently been proposed as a model of such settings.<n>Mon-MDP algorithms developed thus far do not fully exploit the problem structure.<n>We introduce a model-based algorithm for Mon-MDPs that addresses all of these shortcomings.
• Score: 15.438015964569743
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: A tenet of reinforcement learning is that rewards are always observed by the agent. However, this is not true in many realistic settings, e.g., a human observer may not always be able to provide rewards, a sensor to observe rewards may be limited or broken, or rewards may be unavailable during deployment. Monitored Markov decision processes (Mon-MDPs) have recently been proposed as a model of such settings. Yet, Mon-MDP algorithms developed thus far do not fully exploit the problem structure, cannot take advantage of a known monitor, have no worst-case guarantees for ``unsolvable'' Mon-MDPs without specific initialization, and only have asymptotic proofs of convergence. This paper makes three contributions. First, we introduce a model-based algorithm for Mon-MDPs that addresses all of these shortcomings. The algorithm uses two instances of model-based interval estimation, one to guarantee that observable rewards are indeed observed, and another to learn the optimal policy. Second, empirical results demonstrate these advantages, showing faster convergence than prior algorithms in over two dozen benchmark settings, and even more dramatic improvements when the monitor process is known. Third, we present the first finite-sample bound on performance and show convergence to an optimal worst-case policy when some rewards are never observable.

Related papers

• Generalization in Monitored Markov Decision Processes (Mon-MDPs) [9.81003561034599]
  In many real-world scenarios, rewards are not always observable, which can be modeled as a monitored Markov decision process (Mon-MDP)<n>This work explores Mon-MDPs using function approximation (FA) and investigates the challenges involved.<n>We show that combining function approximation with a learned reward model enables agents to generalize from monitored states with observable rewards, to unmonitored environment states with unobservable rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T21:58:25Z)
• A View of the Certainty-Equivalence Method for PAC RL as an Application of the Trajectory Tree Method [5.238591085233903]
  This paper presents a theoretical investigation that stems from the surprising finding that CEM may indeed be viewed as an application of TTM.<n>We obtain (3) improvements in the sample-complexity upper bounds for CEM both for non-stationary and stationary MDPs.<n>We also show (4) a lower bound on the sample complexity for finite-horizon MDPs, which establishes the minimax-optimality of our upper bound for non-stationary MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T20:37:34Z)
• Online POMDP Planning with Anytime Deterministic Guarantees [11.157761902108692]
  Planning under uncertainty can be mathematically formalized using partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) Finding an optimal plan for POMDPs can be computationally expensive and is feasible only for small tasks. We derive a deterministic relationship between a simplified solution that is easier to obtain and the theoretically optimal one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T04:40:38Z)
• Monitoring Algorithmic Fairness under Partial Observations [3.790015813774933]
  runtime verification techniques have been introduced to monitor the algorithmic fairness of deployed systems. Previous monitoring techniques assume full observability of the states of the monitored system. We extend fairness monitoring to systems modeled as partially observed Markov chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T07:35:54Z)
• Improved Sample Complexity for Reward-free Reinforcement Learning under Low-rank MDPs [43.53286390357673]
  This paper focuses on reward-free reinforcement learning under low-rank MDP models. We first provide the first known sample complexity lower bound for any algorithm under low-rank MDPs. We then propose a novel model-based algorithm, coined RAFFLE, and show it can both find an $epsilon$-optimal policy and achieve an $epsilon$-accurate system identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T04:39:39Z)
• B$^3$RTDP: A Belief Branch and Bound Real-Time Dynamic Programming Approach to Solving POMDPs [17.956744635160568]
  We propose an extension to the RTDP-Bel algorithm which we call Belief Branch and Bound RTDP (B$3$RTDP) Our algorithm uses a bounded value function representation and takes advantage of this in two novel ways. We empirically demonstrate that B$3$RTDP can achieve greater returns in less time than the state-of-the-art SARSOP solver on known POMDP problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T21:42:59Z)
• Optimistic MLE -- A Generic Model-based Algorithm for Partially Observable Sequential Decision Making [48.87943416098096]
  This paper introduces a simple efficient learning algorithms for general sequential decision making. We prove that OMLE learns near-optimal policies of an enormously rich class of sequential decision making problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-29T17:56:25Z)
• PAC Statistical Model Checking of Mean Payoff in Discrete- and Continuous-Time MDP [0.34410212782758043]
  We provide the first algorithm to compute mean payoff probably approximately correctly in unknown MDP. We do not require any knowledge of the state space, only a lower bound on the minimum transition probability. In addition to providing probably approximately correct (PAC) bounds for our algorithm, we also demonstrate its practical nature by running experiments on standard benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-03T09:13:27Z)
• Under-Approximating Expected Total Rewards in POMDPs [68.8204255655161]
  We consider the optimal expected total reward to reach a goal state in a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) We use mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) to find such minimal probability shifts and experimentally show that our techniques scale quite well.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-21T16:43:03Z)
• Reinforcement Learning in Reward-Mixing MDPs [74.41782017817808]
  episodic reinforcement learning in a reward-mixing Markov decision process (MDP) cdot S2 A2)$ episodes, where $H$ is time-horizon and $S, A$ are the number of states and actions respectively. epsilon$-optimal policy after exploring $tildeO(poly(H,epsilon-1) cdot S2 A2)$ episodes, where $H$ is time-horizon and $S, A$ are the number of states and actions respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T18:55:49Z)
• A Fully Problem-Dependent Regret Lower Bound for Finite-Horizon MDPs [117.82903457289584]
  We derive a novel problem-dependent lower-bound for regret in finite-horizon Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) We show that our lower-bound is considerably smaller than in the general case and it does not scale with the minimum action gap at all. We show that this last result is attainable (up to $poly(H)$ terms, where $H$ is the horizon) by providing a regret upper-bound based on policy gaps for an optimistic algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T13:46:09Z)
• Adaptive Sampling for Best Policy Identification in Markov Decision Processes [79.4957965474334]
  We investigate the problem of best-policy identification in discounted Markov Decision (MDPs) when the learner has access to a generative model. The advantages of state-of-the-art algorithms are discussed and illustrated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T15:22:24Z)
• Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model [50.38446482252857]
  This paper is concerned with the sample efficiency of reinforcement learning, assuming access to a generative model (or simulator) We first consider $gamma$-discounted infinite-horizon Markov decision processes (MDPs) with state space $mathcalS$ and action space $mathcalA$. We prove that a plain model-based planning algorithm suffices to achieve minimax-optimal sample complexity given any target accuracy level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T17:53:18Z)
• Optimizing for the Future in Non-Stationary MDPs [52.373873622008944]
  We present a policy gradient algorithm that maximizes a forecast of future performance. We show that our algorithm, called Prognosticator, is more robust to non-stationarity than two online adaptation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-17T03:41:19Z)
• Pixel-in-Pixel Net: Towards Efficient Facial Landmark Detection in the Wild [104.61677518999976]
  We propose Pixel-in-Pixel Net (PIPNet) for facial landmark detection. The proposed model is equipped with a novel detection head based on heatmap regression. To further improve the cross-domain generalization capability of PIPNet, we propose self-training with curriculum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-08T12:23:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.