On the Dichotomy Between Privacy and Traceability in $\ell_p$ Stochastic Convex Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17384v1
• Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 18:10:06 GMT
• Title: On the Dichotomy Between Privacy and Traceability in $\ell_p$ Stochastic Convex Optimization
• Authors: Sasha Voitovych, Mahdi Haghifam, Idan Attias, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Roi Livni, Daniel M. Roy,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the necessity of memorization in convex optimization (SCO) under $ell_p$ geometries.<n>Our main results uncover a fundamental tradeoff between traceability and excess risk in SCO.
• Score: 34.23960368886818
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the necessity of memorization in stochastic convex optimization (SCO) under $\ell_p$ geometries. Informally, we say a learning algorithm memorizes $m$ samples (or is $m$-traceable) if, by analyzing its output, it is possible to identify at least $m$ of its training samples. Our main results uncover a fundamental tradeoff between traceability and excess risk in SCO. For every $p\in [1,\infty)$, we establish the existence of a risk threshold below which any sample-efficient learner must memorize a \em{constant fraction} of its sample. For $p\in [1,2]$, this threshold coincides with best risk of differentially private (DP) algorithms, i.e., above this threshold, there are algorithms that do not memorize even a single sample. This establishes a sharp dichotomy between privacy and traceability for $p \in [1,2]$. For $p \in (2,\infty)$, this threshold instead gives novel lower bounds for DP learning, partially closing an open problem in this setup. En route of proving these results, we introduce a complexity notion we term \em{trace value} of a problem, which unifies privacy lower bounds and traceability results, and prove a sparse variant of the fingerprinting lemma.

Related papers

• Towards a Sharp Analysis of Offline Policy Learning for $f$-Divergence-Regularized Contextual Bandits [49.96531901205305]
  We analyze $f$-divergence-regularized offline policy learning.<n>For reverse Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, we give the first $tildeO(epsilon-1)$ sample complexity under single-policy concentrability.<n>We extend our analysis to dueling bandits, and we believe these results take a significant step toward a comprehensive understanding of $f$-divergence-regularized policy learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T22:14:45Z)
• Entangled Mean Estimation in High-Dimensions [36.97113089188035]
  We study the task of high-dimensional entangled mean estimation in the subset-of-signals model.<n>We show that the optimal error (up to polylogarithmic factors) is $f(alpha,N) + sqrtD/(alpha N)$, where the term $f(alpha,N)$ is the error of the one-dimensional problem and the second term is the sub-Gaussian error rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T18:31:35Z)
• Finite-Sample Analysis of the Monte Carlo Exploring Starts Algorithm for Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  We prove a novel result on the convergence rate of the policy algorithm. We show that the algorithm returns an optimal policy after $tildeO(SAK3log3frac1delta)$ sampled episodes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T21:11:29Z)
• Nearly Minimax Optimal Regret for Learning Linear Mixture Stochastic Shortest Path [80.60592344361073]
  We study the Shortest Path (SSP) problem with a linear mixture transition kernel. An agent repeatedly interacts with a environment and seeks to reach certain goal state while minimizing the cumulative cost. Existing works often assume a strictly positive lower bound of the iteration cost function or an upper bound of the expected length for the optimal policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T07:52:00Z)
• Function Value Learning: Adaptive Learning Rates Based on the Polyak Stepsize and Function Splitting in ERM [6.542289202349586]
  We focus on solving a finite sum-of-terms problem, also known as empirical risk minimization. We first detail an idealized adaptive method called $textttSPS_+$ that makes use of the sampled loss values. We then move onto to develop $textttFUVAL$, a variant of $textttSPS_+$ where the loss values at optimality are gradually learned.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T22:12:31Z)
• Reaching Goals is Hard: Settling the Sample Complexity of the Stochastic Shortest Path [106.37656068276902]
  We study the sample complexity of learning an $epsilon$-optimal policy in the Shortest Path (SSP) problem. We derive complexity bounds when the learner has access to a generative model. We show that there exists a worst-case SSP instance with $S$ states, $A$ actions, minimum cost $c_min$, and maximum expected cost of the optimal policy over all states $B_star$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-10T18:34:32Z)
• Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent with Low-Noise [49.981789906200035]
  Modern machine learning algorithms aim to extract fine-grained information from data to provide accurate predictions, which often conflicts with the goal of privacy protection. This paper addresses the practical and theoretical importance of developing privacy-preserving machine learning algorithms that ensure good performance while preserving privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-09T08:54:13Z)
• Best Policy Identification in Linear MDPs [70.57916977441262]
  We investigate the problem of best identification in discounted linear Markov+Delta Decision in the fixed confidence setting under a generative model. The lower bound as the solution of an intricate non- optimization program can be used as the starting point to devise such algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T04:12:50Z)
• Non-Euclidean Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization [15.302167005107135]
  We show that noisy gradient descent (SGD) algorithms attain the optimal excess risk in low-dimensional regimes. Our work draws upon concepts from the geometry of normed spaces, such as the notions of regularity, uniform convexity, and uniform smoothness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-01T19:48:44Z)
• Learning with User-Level Privacy [61.62978104304273]
  We analyze algorithms to solve a range of learning tasks under user-level differential privacy constraints. Rather than guaranteeing only the privacy of individual samples, user-level DP protects a user's entire contribution. We derive an algorithm that privately answers a sequence of $K$ adaptively chosen queries with privacy cost proportional to $tau$, and apply it to solve the learning tasks we consider.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T18:25:13Z)
• Learning Halfspaces with Tsybakov Noise [50.659479930171585]
  We study the learnability of halfspaces in the presence of Tsybakov noise. We give an algorithm that achieves misclassification error $epsilon$ with respect to the true halfspace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T14:25:02Z)
• Model-Free Reinforcement Learning: from Clipped Pseudo-Regret to Sample Complexity [59.34067736545355]
  Given an MDP with $S$ states, $A$ actions, the discount factor $gamma in (0,1)$, and an approximation threshold $epsilon > 0$, we provide a model-free algorithm to learn an $epsilon$-optimal policy. For small enough $epsilon$, we show an improved algorithm with sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-06T13:34:41Z)
• Locally Private Hypothesis Selection [96.06118559817057]
  We output a distribution from $mathcalQ$ whose total variation distance to $p$ is comparable to the best such distribution. We show that the constraint of local differential privacy incurs an exponential increase in cost. Our algorithms result in exponential improvements on the round complexity of previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T18:30:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.