Golden Ratio Weighting Prevents Model Collapse

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18049v2
• Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 16:03:59 GMT
• Title: Golden Ratio Weighting Prevents Model Collapse
• Authors: Hengzhi He, Shirong Xu, Guang Cheng,
• Abstract summary: Recent studies identified a phenomenon in generative model training known as model collapse.<n>We investigate this phenomenon theoretically within a novel framework, where generative models are iteratively trained on a combination of newly collected real data and synthetic data.
• Score: 9.087950471621653
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent studies identified an intriguing phenomenon in recursive generative model training known as model collapse, where models trained on data generated by previous models exhibit severe performance degradation. Addressing this issue and developing more effective training strategies have become central challenges in generative model research. In this paper, we investigate this phenomenon theoretically within a novel framework, where generative models are iteratively trained on a combination of newly collected real data and synthetic data from the previous training step. To develop an optimal training strategy for integrating real and synthetic data, we evaluate the performance of a weighted training scheme in various scenarios, including Gaussian distribution estimation and linear regression. We theoretically characterize the impact of the mixing proportion and weighting scheme of synthetic data on the final model's performance. Our key finding is that, across different settings, the optimal weighting scheme under different proportions of synthetic data asymptotically follows a unified expression, revealing a fundamental trade-off between leveraging synthetic data and generative model performance. Notably, in some cases, the optimal weight assigned to real data corresponds to the reciprocal of the golden ratio. Finally, we validate our theoretical results on extensive simulated datasets and a real tabular dataset.

Related papers

• A Generalized Theory of Mixup for Structure-Preserving Synthetic Data [2.184775414778289]
  We show that mixup can distort key statistical properties such as variance, potentially leading to unintended consequences in data synthesis. We propose a novel mixup method that incorporates a generalized and flexible weighting scheme, better preserving the original data's structure. Numerical experiments confirm that the new approach not only preserves the statistical characteristics of the original data but also sustains model performance across repeated synthesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T14:28:50Z)
• A Theoretical Perspective: How to Prevent Model Collapse in Self-consuming Training Loops [55.07063067759609]
  High-quality data is essential for training large generative models, yet the vast reservoir of real data available online has become nearly depleted. Models increasingly generate their own data for further training, forming Self-consuming Training Loops (STLs) Some models degrade or even collapse, while others successfully avoid these failures, leaving a significant gap in theoretical understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T06:18:13Z)
• Dynamic Loss-Based Sample Reweighting for Improved Large Language Model Pretraining [55.262510814326035]
  Existing reweighting strategies primarily focus on group-level data importance. We introduce novel algorithms for dynamic, instance-level data reweighting. Our framework allows us to devise reweighting strategies deprioritizing redundant or uninformative data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T17:57:15Z)
• On conditional diffusion models for PDE simulations [53.01911265639582]
  We study score-based diffusion models for forecasting and assimilation of sparse observations. We propose an autoregressive sampling approach that significantly improves performance in forecasting. We also propose a new training strategy for conditional score-based models that achieves stable performance over a range of history lengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T18:31:04Z)
• Distilled Datamodel with Reverse Gradient Matching [74.75248610868685]
  We introduce an efficient framework for assessing data impact, comprising offline training and online evaluation stages. Our proposed method achieves comparable model behavior evaluation while significantly speeding up the process compared to the direct retraining method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T09:16:14Z)
• How Bad is Training on Synthetic Data? A Statistical Analysis of Language Model Collapse [9.59833542807268]
  Model collapse occurs when new models are trained on synthetic data generated from previously trained models. We show that model collapse cannot be avoided when training solely on synthetic data. We estimate a maximal amount of synthetic data below which model collapse can eventually be avoided.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-07T22:15:13Z)
• Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Models [56.84592466204185]
  This paper tackles the emerging challenge of training generative models within a self-consuming loop. We construct a theoretical framework to rigorously evaluate how this training procedure impacts the data distributions learned by future models. We present results for kernel density estimation, delivering nuanced insights such as the impact of mixed data training on error propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T02:08:09Z)
• Private Synthetic Data Meets Ensemble Learning [15.425653946755025]
  When machine learning models are trained on synthetic data and then deployed on real data, there is often a performance drop. We introduce a new ensemble strategy for training downstream models, with the goal of enhancing their performance when used on real data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-15T04:24:42Z)
• On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Data [56.153542044045224]
  We study the impact of training generative models on mixed datasets. We first prove the stability of iterative training under the condition that the initial generative models approximate the data distribution well enough. We empirically validate our theory on both synthetic and natural images by iteratively training normalizing flows and state-of-the-art diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T16:41:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.