Towards Statistical Factuality Guarantee for Large Vision-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.20560v1
• Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 22:01:22 GMT
• Title: Towards Statistical Factuality Guarantee for Large Vision-Language Models
• Authors: Zhuohang Li, Chao Yan, Nicholas J. Jackson, Wendi Cui, Bo Li, Jiaxin Zhang, Bradley A. Malin,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a framework to achieve finite-sample distribution-free statistical guarantees on the factuality of LVLM output.<n>ConfLVLM reduces the error rate of claims generated by LLaVa-1.5 for scene descriptions from 87.8% to 10.0% by filtering out erroneous claims with a 95.3% true positive rate.<n>Our results further demonstrate that ConfLVLM is highly flexible, and can be applied to any black-box LVLMs paired with any uncertainty measure for any image-conditioned free-form text generation task.
• Score: 15.51028935811803
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Advancements in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated promising performance in a variety of vision-language tasks involving image-conditioned free-form text generation. However, growing concerns about hallucinations in LVLMs, where the generated text is inconsistent with the visual context, are becoming a major impediment to deploying these models in applications that demand guaranteed reliability. In this paper, we introduce a framework to address this challenge, ConfLVLM, which is grounded on conformal prediction to achieve finite-sample distribution-free statistical guarantees on the factuality of LVLM output. This framework treats an LVLM as a hypothesis generator, where each generated text detail (or claim) is considered an individual hypothesis. It then applies a statistical hypothesis testing procedure to verify each claim using efficient heuristic uncertainty measures to filter out unreliable claims before returning any responses to users. We conduct extensive experiments covering three representative application domains, including general scene understanding, medical radiology report generation, and document understanding. Remarkably, ConfLVLM reduces the error rate of claims generated by LLaVa-1.5 for scene descriptions from 87.8\% to 10.0\% by filtering out erroneous claims with a 95.3\% true positive rate. Our results further demonstrate that ConfLVLM is highly flexible, and can be applied to any black-box LVLMs paired with any uncertainty measure for any image-conditioned free-form text generation task while providing a rigorous guarantee on controlling the risk of hallucination.

Related papers

• Data-Driven Calibration of Prediction Sets in Large Vision-Language Models Based on Inductive Conformal Prediction [0.0]
  We propose a model-agnostic uncertainty quantification method that integrates dynamic threshold calibration and cross-modal consistency verification. We show that the framework achieves stable performance across varying calibration-to-test split ratios, underscoring its robustness for real-world deployment in healthcare, autonomous systems, and other safety-sensitive domains. This work bridges the gap between theoretical reliability and practical applicability in multi-modal AI systems, offering a scalable solution for hallucination detection and uncertainty-aware decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T15:39:46Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification for LLM-Based Survey Simulations [9.303339416902995]
  We investigate the reliable use of simulated survey responses from large language models (LLMs) through the lens of uncertainty quantification.<n>Our approach converts synthetic data into confidence sets for population parameters of human responses, addressing the distribution shift between the simulated and real populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T02:07:29Z)
• VL-Uncertainty: Detecting Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Model via Uncertainty Estimation [18.873512856021357]
  We introduce VL-Uncertainty, the first uncertainty-based framework for detecting hallucinations in large vision-language models. We measure uncertainty by analyzing the prediction variance across semantically equivalent but perturbed prompts. When LVLMs are highly confident, they provide consistent responses to semantically equivalent queries. But, when uncertain, the responses of the target LVLM become more random.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T04:06:04Z)
• FactTest: Factuality Testing in Large Language Models with Finite-Sample and Distribution-Free Guarantees [41.78390564658645]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate hallucinations and non-factual content undermines their reliability in high-stakes domains. We introduce FactTest, a novel framework that statistically assesses whether a LLM can confidently provide correct answers to given questions. We show that FactTest effectively detects hallucinations and improves the model's ability to abstain from answering unknown questions, leading to an over 40% accuracy improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T20:53:04Z)
• Detecting Multimodal Situations with Insufficient Context and Abstaining from Baseless Predictions [75.45274978665684]
  Vision-Language Understanding (VLU) benchmarks contain samples where answers rely on assumptions unsupported by the provided context. We collect contextual data for each sample whenever available and train a context selection module to facilitate evidence-based model predictions. We develop a general-purpose Context-AwaRe Abstention detector to identify samples lacking sufficient context and enhance model accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-18T02:21:32Z)
• Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models [61.6896704217147]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have become indispensable tools in computer vision and natural language processing. Our investigation reveals a noteworthy bias in the generated content, where the output is primarily influenced by the underlying Large Language Models (LLMs) prior to the input image. To rectify these biases and redirect the model's focus toward vision information, we introduce two simple, training-free strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T12:35:07Z)
• Fact-Checking the Output of Large Language Models via Token-Level Uncertainty Quantification [116.77055746066375]
  Large language models (LLMs) are notorious for hallucinating, i.e., producing erroneous claims in their output. We propose a novel fact-checking and hallucination detection pipeline based on token-level uncertainty quantification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T17:44:17Z)
• IBD: Alleviating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via Image-Biased Decoding [37.16880672402059]
  Over-reliance on linguistic priors has been identified as a key factor leading to hallucinations. We propose to alleviate this problem by introducing a novel image-biased decoding technique. Our method derives the next-token probability distribution by contrasting predictions from a conventional LVLM with those of an image-biased LVLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T16:57:22Z)
• Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling [69.83976050879318]
  In large language models (LLMs), identifying sources of uncertainty is an important step toward improving reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty decomposition framework for LLMs, called input clarification ensembling. Our approach generates a set of clarifications for the input, feeds them into an LLM, and ensembles the corresponding predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T05:58:35Z)
• ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
  This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z)
• HyPoradise: An Open Baseline for Generative Speech Recognition with Large Language Models [81.56455625624041]
  We introduce the first open-source benchmark to utilize external large language models (LLMs) for ASR error correction. The proposed benchmark contains a novel dataset, HyPoradise (HP), encompassing more than 334,000 pairs of N-best hypotheses. LLMs with reasonable prompt and its generative capability can even correct those tokens that are missing in N-best list.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:44:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.