Semantic Integrity Constraints: Declarative Guardrails for AI-Augmented Data Processing Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.00600v1
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 19:59:25 GMT
- Title: Semantic Integrity Constraints: Declarative Guardrails for AI-Augmented Data Processing Systems
- Authors: Alexander W. Lee, Justin Chan, Michael Fu, Nicolas Kim, Akshay Mehta, Deepti Raghavan, Ugur Cetintemel,
- Abstract summary: We introduce Semantic Integrity Constraints (SICs) to govern and optimize semantic operators within AI-augmented data processing systems.<n>SICs integrate seamlessly into the relational model, allowing users to specify common classes of constraints.<n>Our work establishes SICs as a foundational framework for trustworthy, high-performance AI-augmented data processing.
- Score: 39.23499993745249
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The emergence of AI-augmented Data Processing Systems (DPSs) has introduced powerful semantic operators that extend traditional data management capabilities with LLM-based processing. However, these systems face fundamental reliability (a.k.a. trust) challenges, as LLMs can generate erroneous outputs, limiting their adoption in critical domains. Existing approaches to LLM constraints--ranging from user-defined functions to constrained decoding--are fragmented, imperative, and lack semantics-aware integration into query execution. To address this gap, we introduce Semantic Integrity Constraints (SICs), a novel declarative abstraction that extends traditional database integrity constraints to govern and optimize semantic operators within DPSs. SICs integrate seamlessly into the relational model, allowing users to specify common classes of constraints (e.g., grounding and soundness) while enabling query-aware enforcement and optimization strategies. In this paper, we present the core design of SICs, describe their formal integration into query execution, and detail our conception of grounding constraints, a key SIC class that ensures factual consistency of generated outputs. In addition, we explore novel enforcement mechanisms, combining proactive (constrained decoding) and reactive (validation and recovery) techniques to optimize efficiency and reliability. Our work establishes SICs as a foundational framework for trustworthy, high-performance AI-augmented data processing, paving the way for future research in constraint-driven optimizations, adaptive enforcement, and enterprise-scale deployments.
Related papers
- CSE-SFP: Enabling Unsupervised Sentence Representation Learning via a Single Forward Pass [3.0566617373924325]
Recent advances in pre-trained language models (PLMs) have driven remarkable progress in this field.
We propose CSE-SFP, an innovative method that exploits the structural characteristics of generative models.
We show that CSE-SFP not only produces higher-quality embeddings but also significantly reduces both training time and memory consumption.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-01T08:27:14Z) - Towards more Contextual Agents: An extractor-Generator Optimization Framework [0.0]
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have demonstrated remarkable success in solving complex tasks across a wide range of general-purpose applications.<n>However, their performance often degrades in context-specific scenarios, such as specialized industries or research domains.<n>To address this challenge, our work introduces a systematic approach to enhance the contextual adaptability of LLM-based agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T15:07:06Z) - DSMoE: Matrix-Partitioned Experts with Dynamic Routing for Computation-Efficient Dense LLMs [70.91804882618243]
This paper proposes DSMoE, a novel approach that achieves sparsification by partitioning pre-trained FFN layers into computational blocks.
We implement adaptive expert routing using sigmoid activation and straight-through estimators, enabling tokens to flexibly access different aspects of model knowledge.
Experiments on LLaMA models demonstrate that under equivalent computational constraints, DSMoE achieves superior performance compared to existing pruning and MoE approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T02:37:26Z) - Federated Fine-Tuning of LLMs: Framework Comparison and Research Directions [59.5243730853157]
Federated learning (FL) provides a privacy-preserving solution for fine-tuning pre-trained large language models (LLMs) using distributed private datasets.<n>This article conducts a comparative analysis of three advanced federated LLM (FedLLM) frameworks that integrate knowledge distillation (KD) and split learning (SL) to mitigate these issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-08T11:37:06Z) - Optimizing Large Language Models for Dynamic Constraints through Human-in-the-Loop Discriminators [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated impressive capabilities across various real-world applications.
We propose a flexible framework that enables LLMs to interact with system interfaces, summarize constraint concepts, and continually optimize performance metrics.
Our framework achieved a $7.78%$ pass rate with the human discriminator and a $6.11%$ pass rate with the LLM-based discriminator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-19T17:27:38Z) - Attribute Controlled Fine-tuning for Large Language Models: A Case Study on Detoxification [76.14641982122696]
We propose a constraint learning schema for fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) with attribute control.
We show that our approach leads to an LLM that produces fewer inappropriate responses while achieving competitive performance on benchmarks and a toxicity detection task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T23:38:58Z) - RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired Content [62.685566387625975]
Current mitigation strategies, while effective, are not resilient under adversarial attacks.
This paper introduces Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models (RigorLLM), a novel framework designed to efficiently moderate harmful and unsafe inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-19T07:25:02Z) - Measuring and Mitigating Constraint Violations of In-Context Learning
for Utterance-to-API Semantic Parsing [15.957744324299869]
In this work, we measure, analyze and mitigate constraints violations in task-oriented semantic parsing.
We investigate two mitigation strategies: Semantic-Retrieval of Demonstrations (SRD) and API-aware Constrained Decoding (API-CD)
Our experiments show that these strategies are effective at reducing constraints violations and improving the quality of the generated API calls, but require careful consideration given their implementation complexity and latency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T16:50:36Z) - Learning to Limit Data Collection via Scaling Laws: Data Minimization
Compliance in Practice [62.44110411199835]
We build on literature in machine learning law to propose framework for limiting collection based on data interpretation that ties data to system performance.
We formalize a data minimization criterion based on performance curve derivatives and provide an effective and interpretable piecewise power law technique.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-16T19:59:01Z) - Teaching the Old Dog New Tricks: Supervised Learning with Constraints [18.88930622054883]
Adding constraint support in Machine Learning has the potential to address outstanding issues in data-driven AI systems.
Existing approaches typically apply constrained optimization techniques to ML training, enforce constraint satisfaction by adjusting the model design, or use constraints to correct the output.
Here, we investigate a different, complementary, strategy based on "teaching" constraint satisfaction to a supervised ML method via the direct use of a state-of-the-art constraint solver.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-25T09:47:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.