EchoQA: A Large Collection of Instruction Tuning Data for Echocardiogram Reports

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02365v2
• Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 03:29:31 GMT
• Title: EchoQA: A Large Collection of Instruction Tuning Data for Echocardiogram Reports
• Authors: Lama Moukheiber, Mira Moukheiber, Dana Moukheiiber, Jae-Woo Ju, Hyung-Chul Lee,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel question-answering (QA) dataset using echocardiogram reports sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database.<n>This dataset is specifically designed to enhance QA systems in cardiology, consisting of 771,244 QA pairs addressing a wide array of cardiac abnormalities and their severity.<n>We compare large language models (LLMs), including open-source and biomedical-specific models for zero-shot evaluation, and closed-source models for zero-shot and three-shot evaluation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce a novel question-answering (QA) dataset using echocardiogram reports sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database. This dataset is specifically designed to enhance QA systems in cardiology, consisting of 771,244 QA pairs addressing a wide array of cardiac abnormalities and their severity. We compare large language models (LLMs), including open-source and biomedical-specific models for zero-shot evaluation, and closed-source models for zero-shot and three-shot evaluation. Our results show that fine-tuning LLMs improves performance across various QA metrics, validating the value of our dataset. Clinicians also qualitatively evaluate the best-performing model to assess the LLM responses for correctness. Further, we conduct fine-grained fairness audits to assess the bias-performance trade-off of LLMs across various social determinants of health. Our objective is to propel the field forward by establishing a benchmark for LLM AI agents aimed at supporting clinicians with cardiac differential diagnoses, thereby reducing the documentation burden that contributes to clinician burnout and enabling healthcare professionals to focus more on patient care.

Related papers

• Performance of Large Language Models in Supporting Medical Diagnosis and Treatment [0.0]
  AI-driven systems can analyze vast datasets, assisting clinicians in identifying diseases, recommending treatments, and predicting patient outcomes. This study evaluates the performance of a range of contemporary LLMs, including both open-source and closed-source models, on the 2024 Portuguese National Exam for medical specialty access.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T16:53:59Z)
• Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases [48.87360916431396]
  We introduce MedR-Bench, a benchmarking dataset of 1,453 structured patient cases, annotated with reasoning references. We propose a framework encompassing three critical examination recommendation, diagnostic decision-making, and treatment planning, simulating the entire patient care journey. Using this benchmark, we evaluate five state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI-o3-mini, and Gemini-2.0-Flash Thinking, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T18:35:39Z)
• Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions. We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning. Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z)
• ASTRID -- An Automated and Scalable TRIaD for the Evaluation of RAG-based Clinical Question Answering Systems [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive potential in clinical question answering. RAG is emerging as a leading approach for ensuring the factual accuracy of model responses. Current automated RAG metrics perform poorly in clinical and conversational use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T15:46:39Z)
• Comprehensive and Practical Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems for Medical Question Answering [70.44269982045415]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) We introduce Medical Retrieval-Augmented Generation Benchmark (MedRGB) that provides various supplementary elements to four medical QA datasets. Our experimental results reveals current models' limited ability to handle noise and misinformation in the retrieved documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T06:19:18Z)
• HealthQ: Unveiling Questioning Capabilities of LLM Chains in Healthcare Conversations [20.31796453890812]
  HealthQ is a framework for evaluating the questioning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare conversations. We integrate an LLM judge to evaluate generated questions across metrics such as specificity, relevance, and usefulness. We present the first systematic framework for assessing questioning capabilities in healthcare conversations, establish a model-agnostic evaluation methodology, and provide empirical evidence linking high-quality questions to improved patient information elicitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-28T23:59:46Z)
• GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AI [67.09501109871351]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are capable of handling diverse data types such as imaging, text, and physiological signals. GMAI-MMBench is the most comprehensive general medical AI benchmark with well-categorized data structure and multi-perceptual granularity to date. It is constructed from 284 datasets across 38 medical image modalities, 18 clinical-related tasks, 18 departments, and 4 perceptual granularities in a Visual Question Answering (VQA) format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T17:59:21Z)
• EHRNoteQA: An LLM Benchmark for Real-World Clinical Practice Using Discharge Summaries [9.031182965159976]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in efficiently analyzing vast and complex data. We introduce EHRNoteQA, a novel benchmark built on the MIMIC-IV EHR, comprising 962 different QA pairs each linked to distinct patients' discharge summaries. EHRNoteQA includes questions that require information across multiple discharge summaries and covers eight diverse topics, mirroring the complexity and diversity of real clinical inquiries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T09:41:50Z)
• K-QA: A Real-World Medical Q&A Benchmark [12.636564634626422]
  We construct K-QA, a dataset containing 1,212 patient questions originating from real-world conversations held on K Health. We employ a panel of in-house physicians to answer and manually decompose a subset of K-QA into self-contained statements. We evaluate several state-of-the-art models, as well as the effect of in-context learning and medically-oriented augmented retrieval schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T20:11:04Z)
• Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on Patient-Trial Matching [49.78442796596806]
  We propose an innovative privacy-aware data augmentation approach for patient-trial matching (LLM-PTM) Our experiments demonstrate a 7.32% average improvement in performance using the proposed LLM-PTM method, and the generalizability to new data is improved by 12.12%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T03:14:00Z)
• SPeC: A Soft Prompt-Based Calibration on Performance Variability of Large Language Model in Clinical Notes Summarization [50.01382938451978]
  We introduce a model-agnostic pipeline that employs soft prompts to diminish variance while preserving the advantages of prompt-based summarization. Experimental findings indicate that our method not only bolsters performance but also effectively curbs variance for various language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T04:47:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.