State of play and future directions in industrial computer vision AI standards

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02675v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 14:46:34 GMT
• Title: State of play and future directions in industrial computer vision AI standards
• Authors: Artemis Stefanidou, Panagiotis Radoglou-Grammatikis, Vasileios Argyriou, Panagiotis Sarigiannidis, Iraklis Varlamis, Georgios Th. Papadopoulos,
• Abstract summary: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Deep Learning (DL) have resulted into corresponding remarkable progress in the field of Computer Vision (CV)<n>This study investigates the current state of play regarding the development of industrial computer vision AI standards.
• Score: 6.5545889890947295
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The recent tremendous advancements in the areas of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Deep Learning (DL) have also resulted into corresponding remarkable progress in the field of Computer Vision (CV), showcasing robust technological solutions in a wide range of application sectors of high industrial interest (e.g., healthcare, autonomous driving, automation, etc.). Despite the outstanding performance of CV systems in specific domains, their development and exploitation at industrial-scale necessitates, among other, the addressing of requirements related to the reliability, transparency, trustworthiness, security, safety, and robustness of the developed AI models. The latter raises the imperative need for the development of efficient, comprehensive and widely-adopted industrial standards. In this context, this study investigates the current state of play regarding the development of industrial computer vision AI standards, emphasizing on critical aspects, like model interpretability, data quality, and regulatory compliance. In particular, a systematic analysis of launched and currently developing CV standards, proposed by the main international standardization bodies (e.g. ISO/IEC, IEEE, DIN, etc.) is performed. The latter is complemented by a comprehensive discussion on the current challenges and future directions observed in this regularization endeavor.

Related papers

• AI Safety Assurance for Automated Vehicles: A Survey on Research, Standardization, Regulation [13.059865395440603]
  Assuring safety of artificial intelligence applied to safety-critical systems is of paramount importance. Research on safeguarding AI is being conducted in parallel to AI standardization and regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T13:14:06Z)
• AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons [62.374792825813394]
  This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehensive industry-standard benchmark for assessing AI-product risk and reliability. The benchmark evaluates an AI system's resistance to prompts designed to elicit dangerous, illegal, or undesirable behavior in 12 hazard categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T05:58:52Z)
• Standardization Trends on Safety and Trustworthiness Technology for Advanced AI [0.0]
  Recent AI technologies based on large language models and foundation models are approaching or surpassing artificial general intelligence. These advancements have raised concerns regarding the safety and trustworthiness of advanced AI. Efforts are being expended to develop internationally agreed-upon standards to ensure the safety and reliability of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T15:50:24Z)
• On the role of Artificial Intelligence methods in modern force-controlled manufacturing robotic tasks [0.0]
  AI's role in enhancing robotic manipulators is rapidly leading to significant innovations in smart manufacturing.<n>This article is to frame these innovations in practical force-controlled applications, highlighting their necessity for maintaining high-quality production standards.<n>The analysis concludes with a perspective on future research directions, emphasizing the need for common performance metrics to validate AI techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T11:29:26Z)
• Towards General Industrial Intelligence: A Survey of Continual Large Models in Industrial IoT [25.16997700703974]
  This survey explores the integration of IIoT with large models (LMs) and their potential applications in industrial environments.<n>We focus on four primary types of industrial LMs: language-based, vision-based, time-series, and multimodal models.<n>We analyze how IIoT provides abundant and diverse data resources, supporting the training and fine-tuning of LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T12:35:59Z)
• The Necessity of AI Audit Standards Boards [0.0]
  We argue that creating auditing standards is not just insufficient, but actively harmful by proliferating unheeded and inconsistent standards. Instead, the paper proposes the establishment of an AI Audit Standards Board, responsible for developing and updating auditing methods and standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T15:08:24Z)
• Developing and Deploying Industry Standards for Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED): Challenges, Strategies, and Future Directions [22.65961106637345]
  The adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) holds the promise of revolutionizing educational practices. The lack of standardized practices in the development and deployment of AIED solutions has led to fragmented ecosystems. This article aims to address the critical need to develop and implement industry standards in AIED.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T22:38:08Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Survey on Foundation Models for Prognostics and Health Management in Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems [1.1034992901877594]
  Large-scale foundation models (LFMs) like BERT and GPT signifies a significant advancement in AI technology. ChatGPT stands as a remarkable accomplishment within this research paradigm, harboring potential for General Artificial Intelligence. Considering the ongoing enhancement in data acquisition technology and data processing capability, LFMs are anticipated to assume a crucial role in the PHM domain of ICPS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T09:58:46Z)
• Federated Learning for Industrial Internet of Things in Future Industries [106.13524161081355]
  The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) offers promising opportunities to transform the operation of industrial systems. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely utilized for realizing intelligent IIoT applications. Federated Learning (FL) is particularly attractive for intelligent IIoT networks by coordinating multiple IIoT devices and machines to perform AI training at the network edge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T01:02:59Z)
• Validate and Enable Machine Learning in Industrial AI [47.20869253934116]
  Industrial AI promises more efficient future industrial control systems. The Petuum Optimum system is used as an example to showcase the challenges in making and testing AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T20:33:05Z)
• Trustworthy AI Inference Systems: An Industry Research View [58.000323504158054]
  We provide an industry research view for approaching the design, deployment, and operation of trustworthy AI inference systems. We highlight opportunities and challenges in AI systems using trusted execution environments. We outline areas of further development that require the global collective attention of industry, academia, and government researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T23:05:55Z)
• Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims [59.64274607533249]
  AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable. This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems. We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.