Markets for Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02946v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 19:07:02 GMT
• Title: Markets for Models
• Authors: Krishna Dasaratha, Juan Ortner, Chengyang Zhu,
• Abstract summary: We study markets in which firms sell models to a consumer to help improve their prediction.<n>We show that market structure can depend on subtle and nonmonotonic ways on the statistical properties of available models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Motivated by the prevalence of prediction problems in the economy, we study markets in which firms sell models to a consumer to help improve their prediction. Firms decide whether to enter, choose models to train on their data, and set prices. The consumer can purchase multiple models and use a weighted average of the models bought. Market outcomes can be expressed in terms of the bias-variance decompositions of the models that firms sell. We show that market structure can depend in subtle and nonmonotonic ways on the statistical properties of available models. Moreover, firms may choose inefficiently biased models to deter entry by competitors or to obtain larger profits.

Related papers

• DiffSTOCK: Probabilistic relational Stock Market Predictions using Diffusion Models [1.9662978733004601]
  We develop an architecture for providing better market predictions conditioned on the historical financial indicators and inter-stock relations. We also provide a novel deterministic architecture MaTCHS which uses Masked Transformer(RTM) to exploit inter-stock relations along with historical stock features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T01:20:32Z)
• Predictive Churn with the Set of Good Models [64.05949860750235]
  We study the effect of conflicting predictions over the set of near-optimal machine learning models. We present theoretical results on the expected churn between models within the Rashomon set. We show how our approach can be used to better anticipate, reduce, and avoid churn in consumer-facing applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:15:25Z)
• An Auction-based Marketplace for Model Trading in Federated Learning [54.79736037670377]
  Federated learning (FL) is increasingly recognized for its efficacy in training models using locally distributed data. We frame FL as a marketplace of models, where clients act as both buyers and sellers. We propose an auction-based solution to ensure proper pricing based on performance gain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T07:25:53Z)
• Improved Bayes Risk Can Yield Reduced Social Welfare Under Competition [99.7047087527422]
  In this work, we demonstrate that competition can fundamentally alter the behavior of machine learning scaling trends. We find many settings where improving data representation quality decreases the overall predictive accuracy across users. At a conceptual level, our work suggests that favorable scaling trends for individual model-providers need not translate to downstream improvements in social welfare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T13:06:34Z)
• Finding Regularized Competitive Equilibria of Heterogeneous Agent Macroeconomic Models with Reinforcement Learning [151.03738099494765]
  We study a heterogeneous agent macroeconomic model with an infinite number of households and firms competing in a labor market. We propose a data-driven reinforcement learning framework that finds the regularized competitive equilibrium of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T17:16:27Z)
• Investigating Ensemble Methods for Model Robustness Improvement of Text Classifiers [66.36045164286854]
  We analyze a set of existing bias features and demonstrate there is no single model that works best for all the cases. By choosing an appropriate bias model, we can obtain a better robustness result than baselines with a more sophisticated model design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T17:52:10Z)
• Multimodal Generative Models for Bankruptcy Prediction Using Textual Data [2.1756081703276]
  This research introduces the Multimodal Discriminative Conditional (CMMD) model that learns multimodal representations that embed information from accounting, market, and textual data modalities. With this novel methodology, it is realistic to use textual data in bankruptcy prediction models, since accounting and market data are available for all companies, unlike textual data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T17:44:03Z)
• A Comparative Study on Forecasting of Retail Sales [0.0]
  We benchmark forecasting models on historical sales data from Walmart to predict their future sales. We apply these models on the forecasting challenge dataset (M5 forecasting by Kaggle)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T04:24:29Z)
• Predicting on the Edge: Identifying Where a Larger Model Does Better [61.793778186198864]
  We show that large models have the largest improvement on examples where the small model is most uncertain. We show that a switcher model which defers examples to a larger model when a small model is uncertain can achieve striking improvements in performance and resource usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T18:53:14Z)
• Design and Analysis of Robust Deep Learning Models for Stock Price Prediction [0.0]
  Building predictive models for robust and accurate prediction of stock prices and stock price movement is a challenging research problem to solve. This chapter proposes a collection of predictive regression models built on deep learning architecture for robust and precise prediction of the future prices of a stock listed in the diversified sectors in the National Stock Exchange (NSE) of India.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-17T17:15:02Z)
• Characterizing Fairness Over the Set of Good Models Under Selective Labels [69.64662540443162]
  We develop a framework for characterizing predictive fairness properties over the set of models that deliver similar overall performance. We provide tractable algorithms to compute the range of attainable group-level predictive disparities. We extend our framework to address the empirically relevant challenge of selectively labelled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T02:11:37Z)
• Beating the market with a bad predictive model [0.0]
  We prove that it is generally possible to make systematic profits with a completely inferior price-predicting model. The key idea is to alter the training objective of the predictive models to explicitly decorrelate them from the market.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-23T16:20:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.