Privacy-Preserving Fair Synthetic Tabular Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02968v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 19:51:00 GMT
• Title: Privacy-Preserving Fair Synthetic Tabular Data
• Authors: Fatima J. Sarmin, Atiquer R. Rahman, Christopher J. Henry, Noman Mohammed,
• Abstract summary: We present PF-WGAN, a privacy-preserving, fair synthetic data generator based on the WGAN-GP model.<n>We modified the original WGAN-GP by adding privacy and fairness constraints forcing it to produce privacy-preserving fair data.<n>This approach will enable the publication of datasets that protect individual's privacy and remain unbiased toward any particular group.
• Score: 1.492801861693149
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Sharing of tabular data containing valuable but private information is limited due to legal and ethical issues. Synthetic data could be an alternative solution to this sharing problem, as it is artificially generated by machine learning algorithms and tries to capture the underlying data distribution. However, machine learning models are not free from memorization and may introduce biases, as they rely on training data. Producing synthetic data that preserves privacy and fairness while maintaining utility close to the real data is a challenging task. This research simultaneously addresses both the privacy and fairness aspects of synthetic data, an area not explored by other studies. In this work, we present PF-WGAN, a privacy-preserving, fair synthetic tabular data generator based on the WGAN-GP model. We have modified the original WGAN-GP by adding privacy and fairness constraints forcing it to produce privacy-preserving fair data. This approach will enable the publication of datasets that protect individual's privacy and remain unbiased toward any particular group. We compared the results with three state-of-the-art synthetic data generator models in terms of utility, privacy, and fairness across four different datasets. We found that the proposed model exhibits a more balanced trade-off among utility, privacy, and fairness.

Related papers

• Synthetic Data Privacy Metrics [2.1213500139850017]
  We review the pros and cons of popular metrics that include simulations of adversarial attacks.<n>We also review current best practices for amending generative models to enhance the privacy of the data they create.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T17:02:33Z)
• Tabular Data Synthesis with Differential Privacy: A Survey [24.500349285858597]
  Data sharing is a prerequisite for collaborative innovation, enabling organizations to leverage diverse datasets for deeper insights. Data synthesis tackles this by generating artificial datasets that preserve the statistical characteristics of real data. Differentially private data synthesis has emerged as a promising approach to privacy-aware data sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T06:32:48Z)
• Evaluating Differentially Private Synthetic Data Generation in High-Stakes Domains [9.123834467375532]
  We explore the feasibility of using synthetic data generated from differentially private language models in place of real data to facilitate the development of NLP in high-stakes domains. Our results show that prior simplistic evaluations have failed to highlight utility, privacy, and fairness issues in the synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T19:31:02Z)
• FewFedPIT: Towards Privacy-preserving and Few-shot Federated Instruction Tuning [54.26614091429253]
  Federated instruction tuning (FedIT) is a promising solution, by consolidating collaborative training across multiple data owners. FedIT encounters limitations such as scarcity of instructional data and risk of exposure to training data extraction attacks. We propose FewFedPIT, designed to simultaneously enhance privacy protection and model performance of federated few-shot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T08:41:22Z)
• Scaling While Privacy Preserving: A Comprehensive Synthetic Tabular Data Generation and Evaluation in Learning Analytics [0.412484724941528]
  Privacy poses a significant obstacle to the progress of learning analytics (LA), presenting challenges like inadequate anonymization and data misuse. Synthetic data emerges as a potential remedy, offering robust privacy protection. Prior LA research on synthetic data lacks thorough evaluation, essential for assessing the delicate balance between privacy and data utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T20:27:55Z)
• Practical considerations on using private sampling for synthetic data [1.3654846342364308]
  Differential privacy for synthetic data generation has received much attention due to the ability of preserving privacy while freely using the synthetic data. Private sampling is the first noise-free method to construct differentially private synthetic data with rigorous bounds for privacy and accuracy. We provide an implementation of the private sampling algorithm and discuss the realism of its constraints in practical cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T10:20:04Z)
• Federated Learning Empowered by Generative Content [55.576885852501775]
  Federated learning (FL) enables leveraging distributed private data for model training in a privacy-preserving way. We propose a novel FL framework termed FedGC, designed to mitigate data heterogeneity issues by diversifying private data with generative content. We conduct a systematic empirical study on FedGC, covering diverse baselines, datasets, scenarios, and modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T07:38:56Z)
• Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs [54.262044436203965]
  We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models. It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T09:03:18Z)
• Membership Inference Attacks against Synthetic Data through Overfitting Detection [84.02632160692995]
  We argue for a realistic MIA setting that assumes the attacker has some knowledge of the underlying data distribution. We propose DOMIAS, a density-based MIA model that aims to infer membership by targeting local overfitting of the generative model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T11:27:39Z)
• Private Set Generation with Discriminative Information [63.851085173614]
  Differentially private data generation is a promising solution to the data privacy challenge. Existing private generative models are struggling with the utility of synthetic samples. We introduce a simple yet effective method that greatly improves the sample utility of state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T10:02:55Z)
• Representative & Fair Synthetic Data [68.8204255655161]
  We present a framework to incorporate fairness constraints into the self-supervised learning process. We generate a representative as well as fair version of the UCI Adult census data set. We consider representative & fair synthetic data a promising future building block to teach algorithms not on historic worlds, but rather on the worlds that we strive to live in.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T09:19:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.