Leveraging Large Language Models For Optimized Item Categorization using UNSPSC Taxonomy
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04728v1
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 00:12:13 GMT
- Title: Leveraging Large Language Models For Optimized Item Categorization using UNSPSC Taxonomy
- Abstract summary: The United Nations Standard Products and Services Code (UNSPSC) provides a standardized system for cataloguing inventory.<n>This paper investigates the deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the classification of inventory data into UNSPSC codes based on Item Descriptions.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: Effective item categorization is vital for businesses, enabling the transformation of unstructured datasets into organized categories that streamline inventory management. Despite its importance, item categorization remains highly subjective and lacks a uniform standard across industries and businesses. The United Nations Standard Products and Services Code (UNSPSC) provides a standardized system for cataloguing inventory, yet employing UNSPSC categorizations often demands significant manual effort. This paper investigates the deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the classification of inventory data into UNSPSC codes based on Item Descriptions. We evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of LLMs in categorizing diverse datasets, exploring their language processing capabilities and their potential as a tool for standardizing inventory classification. Our findings reveal that LLMs can substantially diminish the manual labor involved in item categorization while maintaining high accuracy, offering a scalable solution for businesses striving to enhance their inventory management practices.
Related papers
- OpenCompass: A Universal Evaluation Platform for Large Language Models [62.59671563145442]
General-purpose large language models (LLMs) have become a critical link in advancing technological development.<n>Mainstream benchmark datasets face challenges such as the diversity of task types, inconsistent evaluation criteria, and fragmentation of data and processing.<n>This paper proposes and open-source Open LLMs, a one-stop, scalable, and high-concurrency general-purpose evaluation platform.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-19T02:50:11Z) - Large Multimodal Models as General In-Context Classifiers [73.11242790834383]
In this work, we argue that this answer overlooks an important capability of LMMs: in-context learning.<n>We benchmark state-of-the-art LMMs on diverse datasets for closed-world classification and find that, although their zero-shot performance is lower than CLIP's, LMMs with a few in-context examples can match or even surpass contrastive VLMs with cache-based adapters.<n>We extend this analysis to the open-world setting, where the generative nature of LMMs makes them more suitable for the task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T17:08:18Z) - Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMs [66.63911043019294]
Data preparation aims to denoise raw datasets, uncover cross-dataset relationships, and extract valuable insights from them.<n>This paper focuses on the use of LLM techniques to prepare data for diverse downstream tasks.<n>We introduce a task-centric taxonomy that organizes the field into three major tasks: data cleaning, standardization, error processing, imputation, data integration, and data enrichment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-22T12:02:45Z) - GLiClass: Generalist Lightweight Model for Sequence Classification Tasks [49.2639069781367]
We propose GLiClass, a novel method that adapts the GLiNER architecture for sequence classification tasks.<n>Our approach achieves strong accuracy and efficiency comparable to embedding-based methods, while maintaining the flexibility needed for zero-shot and few-shot learning scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-11T06:22:25Z) - TaP: A Taxonomy-Guided Framework for Automated and Scalable Preference Data Generation [50.319535974012]
Conducting supervised fine-tuning and preference fine-tuning on large language models (LLMs) requires high-quality datasets.<n>Most available datasets for supervised and preference fine-tuning are in English.<n>We propose the underlinetextbfTaxonomy-Guided underlinetextbfPreference Data Generation framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-30T15:45:28Z) - SCAN: Structured Capability Assessment and Navigation for LLMs [54.54085382131134]
textbfSCAN (Structured Capability Assessment and Navigation) is a practical framework that enables detailed characterization of Large Language Models.<n>SCAN incorporates four key components:.<n>TaxBuilder, which extracts capability-indicating tags from queries to construct a hierarchical taxonomy;.<n>RealMix, a query synthesis and filtering mechanism that ensures sufficient evaluation data for each capability tag;.<n>A PC$2$-based (Pre-Comparison-derived Criteria) LLM-as-a-Judge approach achieves significantly higher accuracy compared to classic LLM-as-a-Judge method
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-10T16:52:40Z) - A Multi-Stage Framework with Taxonomy-Guided Reasoning for Occupation Classification Using Large Language Models [13.350477885980512]
Large language models (LLMs) hold promise due to their extensive world knowledge and in-context learning capabilities.
We propose a multi-stage framework consisting of inference, retrieval, and reranking stages.
Our results indicate that the framework outperforms existing LLM-based methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-17T09:44:50Z) - Automated Query-Product Relevance Labeling using Large Language Models for E-commerce Search [3.392843594990172]
Traditional approaches for annotating query-product pairs rely on human-based labeling services.<n>We show that Large Language Models (LLMs) can approach human-level accuracy on this task in a fraction of the time and cost required by human-labelers.<n>This scalable alternative to human-annotation has significant implications for information retrieval domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-21T22:59:36Z) - Can Large Language Models Serve as Effective Classifiers for Hierarchical Multi-Label Classification of Scientific Documents at Industrial Scale? [1.0562108865927007]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential in complex tasks such as multi-label classification.<n>We present methods that combine the strengths of LLMs with dense retrieval techniques to overcome these challenges.<n>We evaluate the effectiveness of our methods on SSRN, a large repository of preprints spanning multiple disciplines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-06T15:51:22Z) - Are Large Language Models Good Classifiers? A Study on Edit Intent Classification in Scientific Document Revisions [62.12545440385489]
Large language models (LLMs) have brought substantial advancements in text generation, but their potential for enhancing classification tasks remains underexplored.
We propose a framework for thoroughly investigating fine-tuning LLMs for classification, including both generation- and encoding-based approaches.
We instantiate this framework in edit intent classification (EIC), a challenging and underexplored classification task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T20:48:28Z) - Exploring Fine-grained Retail Product Discrimination with Zero-shot Object Classification Using Vision-Language Models [50.370043676415875]
In smart retail applications, the large number of products and their frequent turnover necessitate reliable zero-shot object classification methods.
We introduce the MIMEX dataset, comprising 28 distinct product categories.
We benchmark the zero-shot object classification performance of state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs) on the proposed MIMEX dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-23T12:28:40Z) - LLM-Based Robust Product Classification in Commerce and Compliance [0.0]
This research explores the real-life challenges of industrial classification and we propose data perturbations that allow for realistic data simulation.
Our research shows that LLMs with in-context learning outperform the supervised approaches in the clean-data scenario.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-11T22:59:32Z) - Logistic Regression makes small LLMs strong and explainable "tens-of-shot" classifiers [0.0]
We show that users can benefit from the advantages of using small, local, generative language models instead of large commercial models.
These advantages, including privacy, availability, cost, and explainability, are important both in commercial applications and in the broader democratisation of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-06T19:23:42Z) - LLM-Select: Feature Selection with Large Language Models [64.5099482021597]
Large language models (LLMs) are capable of selecting the most predictive features, with performance rivaling the standard tools of data science.
Our findings suggest that LLMs may be useful not only for selecting the best features for training but also for deciding which features to collect in the first place.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T22:23:40Z) - Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases.
We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning.
Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z) - Learning to Extract Structured Entities Using Language Models [52.281701191329]
Recent advances in machine learning have significantly impacted the field of information extraction.
We reformulate the task to be entity-centric, enabling the use of diverse metrics.
We contribute to the field by introducing Structured Entity Extraction and proposing the Approximate Entity Set OverlaP metric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T22:15:09Z) - From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets.
Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z) - Multi-output Headed Ensembles for Product Item Classification [0.9053163124987533]
We propose a deep learning based classification model framework for e-commerce catalogs.
We show improvements against robust industry standard baseline models.
We also propose a novel way to evaluate model performance using user sessions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-29T01:23:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.