Global AI Governance: Where the Challenge is the Solution- An Interdisciplinary, Multilateral, and Vertically Coordinated Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04766v1
• Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:24:30 GMT
• Title: Global AI Governance: Where the Challenge is the Solution- An Interdisciplinary, Multilateral, and Vertically Coordinated Approach
• Authors: Huixin Zhong, Thao Do, Ynagliu Jie, Rostam J. Neuwirth, Hong Shen,
• Abstract summary: Current global AI governance frameworks struggle with fragmented disciplinary collaboration, ineffective multilateral coordination, and disconnects between policy design and grassroots implementation.<n>This study, guided by Integration and Implementation Science (IIS), initiated a structured interdisciplinary dialogue at the UN Science Summit.
• Score: 2.0924506234785345
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Current global AI governance frameworks struggle with fragmented disciplinary collaboration, ineffective multilateral coordination, and disconnects between policy design and grassroots implementation. This study, guided by Integration and Implementation Science (IIS) initiated a structured interdisciplinary dialogue at the UN Science Summit, convening legal, NGO, and HCI experts to tackle those challenges. Drawing on the common ground of the experts: dynamism, experimentation, inclusivity, and paradoxical governance, this study, through thematic analysis and interdisciplinary comparison analysis, identifies four core principles of global AI governance. Furthermore, we translate these abstract principles into concrete action plans leveraging the distinct yet complementary perspectives of each discipline. These principles and action plans are then integrated into a five-phase, time-sequential framework including foundation building, experimental verification, collaborative optimization, global adaptation, and continuous evolution phases. This multilevel framework offers a novel and concrete pathway toward establishing interdisciplinary, multilateral, and vertically coordinated AI governance, transforming global AI governance challenges into opportunities for political actions.

Related papers

• Towards deployment-centric multimodal AI beyond vision and language [67.02589156099391]
  We advocate a deployment-centric workflow that incorporates deployment constraints early to reduce the likelihood of undeployable solutions. We identify common multimodal-AI-specific challenges shared across disciplines and examine three real-world use cases. By fostering multidisciplinary dialogue and open research practices, our community can accelerate deployment-centric development for broad societal impact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T17:20:05Z)
• Multi-Agent Coordination across Diverse Applications: A Survey [48.80487202140282]
  Multi-agent coordination studies the underlying mechanism enabling the trending spread of diverse multi-agent systems (MAS)<n>This survey outlines the current state of coordination research across applications through a unified understanding that answers four fundamental coordination questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T17:12:45Z)
• Evolving interdisciplinary contributions to global societal challenges: A 50-year overview [0.0]
  In recent decades, interdisciplinary collaboration has been recognised as a vital driver of innovation and effective problem-solving. This study examines the long-term evolution of interdisciplinary contributions to the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T22:36:36Z)
• AI For Global Climate Cooperation 2023 Competition Proceedings [77.07135605362795]
  No global authority can ensure compliance with international climate agreements. RICE-N supports modeling regional decision-making using AI agents. The IAM then models the climate-economic impact of those decisions into the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T20:05:42Z)
• Bridging the Global Divide in AI Regulation: A Proposal for a Contextual, Coherent, and Commensurable Framework [0.9622882291833615]
  This paper proposes an alternative contextual, coherent, and commensurable (3C) framework for regulating artificial intelligence (AI) To ensure contextuality, the framework bifurcates the AI life cycle into two phases: learning and deployment for specific tasks, instead of defining foundation or general-purpose models. To ensure commensurability, the framework promotes the adoption of international standards for measuring and mitigating risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T15:23:40Z)
• A multidomain relational framework to guide institutional AI research and adoption [0.0]
  We argue that research efforts aimed at understanding the implications of adopting AI tend to prioritize only a handful of ideas. We propose a simple policy and research design tool in the form of a conceptual framework to organize terms across fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T16:33:01Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• A Unified Multi-task Learning Framework for Multi-goal Conversational Recommender Systems [91.70511776167488]
  Four tasks are often involved in MG-CRS, including Goal Planning, Topic Prediction, Item Recommendation, and Response Generation. We propose a novel Unified MultI-goal conversational recommeNDer system, namely UniMIND. Prompt-based learning strategies are investigated to endow the unified model with the capability of multi-task learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-14T12:31:27Z)
• Computability, Complexity, Consistency and Controllability: A Four C's Framework for cross-disciplinary Ethical Algorithm Research [1.8275108630751844]
  We set out a framework which we believe is useful for fostering cross-disciplinary understanding of pertinent issues in ethical algorithmic literature. We provide examples of how insights from ethics, philosophy and population ethics are relevant to and translatable within sciences concerned with the study and design of algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-30T17:03:22Z)
• Investigating Bi-Level Optimization for Learning and Vision from a Unified Perspective: A Survey and Beyond [114.39616146985001]
  In machine learning and computer vision fields, despite the different motivations and mechanisms, a lot of complex problems contain a series of closely related subproblms. In this paper, we first uniformly express these complex learning and vision problems from the perspective of Bi-Level Optimization (BLO) Then we construct a value-function-based single-level reformulation and establish a unified algorithmic framework to understand and formulate mainstream gradient-based BLO methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T16:20:23Z)
• Progressing Towards Responsible AI [2.191505742658975]
  Observatory on Society and Artificial Intelligence (OSAI) grew out of the project AI4EU. OSAI aims to stimulate reflection on a broad spectrum of issues of AI (ethical, legal, social, economic and cultural)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-11T09:46:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.