VizTrust: A Visual Analytics Tool for Capturing User Trust Dynamics in Human-AI Communication

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07279v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:00:41 GMT
• Title: VizTrust: A Visual Analytics Tool for Capturing User Trust Dynamics in Human-AI Communication
• Authors: Xin Wang, Stephanie Tulk Jesso, Sadamori Kojaku, David M Neyens, Min Sun Kim,
• Abstract summary: VizTrust is a real-time visual analytics tool that captures user trust dynamics in human-agent communication.<n>It enables stakeholders to observe trust formation as it happens, identify patterns in trust development, and pinpoint specific interaction elements that influence trust.
• Score: 4.839478919041786
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Trust plays a fundamental role in shaping the willingness of users to engage and collaborate with artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Yet, measuring user trust remains challenging due to its complex and dynamic nature. While traditional survey methods provide trust levels for long conversations, they fail to capture its dynamic evolution during ongoing interactions. Here, we present VizTrust, which addresses this challenge by introducing a real-time visual analytics tool that leverages a multi-agent collaboration system to capture and analyze user trust dynamics in human-agent communication. Built on established human-computer trust scales-competence, integrity, benevolence, and predictability-, VizTrust enables stakeholders to observe trust formation as it happens, identify patterns in trust development, and pinpoint specific interaction elements that influence trust. Our tool offers actionable insights into human-agent trust formation and evolution in real time through a dashboard, supporting the design of adaptive conversational agents that responds effectively to user trust signals.

Related papers

• Modeling the quantum-like dynamics of human reliability ratings in Human-AI interactions by interaction dependent Hamiltonians [0.0]
  We explore the ability of Quantum Random Walk models to model the dynamics of trust in human-AI interactions. We find that using empirical parameters to inform the use of different Hamiltonians can provide a promising means to model the evolution of trust in Human-AI interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T03:23:00Z)
• Trusting Your AI Agent Emotionally and Cognitively: Development and Validation of a Semantic Differential Scale for AI Trust [16.140485357046707]
  We develop and validated a set of 27-item semantic differential scales for affective and cognitive trust. Our empirical findings showed how the emotional and cognitive aspects of trust interact with each other and collectively shape a person's overall trust in AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T18:55:33Z)
• A Diachronic Perspective on User Trust in AI under Uncertainty [52.44939679369428]
  Modern NLP systems are often uncalibrated, resulting in confidently incorrect predictions that undermine user trust. We study the evolution of user trust in response to trust-eroding events using a betting game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T14:41:46Z)
• TrustGuard: GNN-based Robust and Explainable Trust Evaluation with Dynamicity Support [59.41529066449414]
  We propose TrustGuard, a GNN-based accurate trust evaluation model that supports trust dynamicity. TrustGuard is designed with a layered architecture that contains a snapshot input layer, a spatial aggregation layer, a temporal aggregation layer, and a prediction layer. Experiments show that TrustGuard outperforms state-of-the-art GNN-based trust evaluation models with respect to trust prediction across single-timeslot and multi-timeslot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T07:39:12Z)
• Converging Measures and an Emergent Model: A Meta-Analysis of Human-Automation Trust Questionnaires [0.6853165736531939]
  We identify the most frequently cited and best-validated human-automation and human-robot trust questionnaires. We demonstrate a convergent experimentally validated model of human-automation trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T04:42:49Z)
• KGTrust: Evaluating Trustworthiness of SIoT via Knowledge Enhanced Graph Neural Networks [63.531790269009704]
  Social Internet of Things (SIoT) is a promising and emerging paradigm that injects the notion of social networking into smart objects (i.e., things) Due to the risks and uncertainty, a crucial and urgent problem to be settled is establishing reliable relationships within SIoT, that is, trust evaluation. We propose a novel knowledge-enhanced graph neural network (KGTrust) for better trust evaluation in SIoT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T14:24:45Z)
• Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication Perspective [56.80107647520364]
  We draw from communication theories and literature on trust in technologies to develop a conceptual model called MATCH. We highlight transparency and interaction as AI systems' affordances that present a wide range of trustworthiness cues to users. We propose a checklist of requirements to help technology creators identify appropriate cues to use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T00:14:33Z)
• Personalized multi-faceted trust modeling to determine trust links in social media and its potential for misinformation management [61.88858330222619]
  We present an approach for predicting trust links between peers in social media. We propose a data-driven multi-faceted trust modeling which incorporates many distinct features for a comprehensive analysis. Illustrated in a trust-aware item recommendation task, we evaluate the proposed framework in the context of a large Yelp dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-11T19:40:51Z)
• Trust as Extended Control: Active Inference and User Feedback During Human-Robot Collaboration [2.6381163133447836]
  Despite its crucial role, it is largely unknown how trust emerges, develops, and supports human interactions with nonhuman artefacts. We introduce a model of trust as an agent's best explanation for reliable sensory exchange with an extended motor plant or partner. We examine the role of shared behavior in the genesis of trust, especially in the context of dyadic collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-22T16:11:22Z)
• Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI [55.4046755826066]
  We discuss a model of trust inspired by, but not identical to, sociology's interpersonal trust (i.e., trust between people) We incorporate a formalization of 'contractual trust', such that trust between a user and an AI is trust that some implicit or explicit contract will hold. We discuss how to design trustworthy AI, how to evaluate whether trust has manifested, and whether it is warranted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T03:07:23Z)
• Towards Time-Aware Context-Aware Deep Trust Prediction in Online Social Networks [0.4061135251278187]
  Trust can be defined as a measure to determine which source of information is reliable and with whom we should share or from whom we should accept information. There are several applications for trust in Online Social Networks (OSNs), including social spammer detection, fake news detection, retweet behaviour detection and recommender systems. Trust prediction is the process of predicting a new trust relation between two users who are not currently connected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-21T01:00:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.