Junior Software Developers' Perspectives on Adopting LLMs for Software Engineering: a Systematic Literature Review
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07556v1
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:25:24 GMT
- Title: Junior Software Developers' Perspectives on Adopting LLMs for Software Engineering: a Systematic Literature Review
- Authors: Samuel Ferino, Rashina Hoda, John Grundy, Christoph Treude,
- Abstract summary: This paper provides an overview of junior software developers' perspectives and use of Large Language Model-based tools for software engineering (LLM4SE)<n>We conducted a systematic literature review following guidelines by Kitchenham et al. on 56 primary studies.<n>Only 8.9% of the studies provide a clear definition for junior software developers, and there is no uniformity.
- Score: 17.22501688824729
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Many studies exploring the adoption of Large Language Model-based tools for software development by junior developers have emerged in recent years. These studies have sought to understand developers' perspectives about using those tools, a fundamental pillar for successfully adopting LLM-based tools in Software Engineering. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of junior software developers' perspectives and use of LLM-based tools for software engineering (LLM4SE). We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) following guidelines by Kitchenham et al. on 56 primary studies, applying the definition for junior software developers as software developers with equal or less than five years of experience, including Computer Science/Software Engineering students. We found that the majority of the studies focused on comprehending the different aspects of integrating AI tools in SE. Only 8.9\% of the studies provide a clear definition for junior software developers, and there is no uniformity. Searching for relevant information is the most common task using LLM tools. ChatGPT was the most common LLM tool present in the studies (and experiments). A majority of the studies (83.9\%) report both positive and negative perceptions about the impact of adopting LLM tools. We also found and categorised advantages, challenges, and recommendations regarding LLM adoption. Our results indicate that developers are using LLMs not just for code generation, but also to improve their development skills. Critically, they are not just experiencing the benefits of adopting LLM tools, but they are also aware of at least a few LLM limitations, such as the generation of wrong suggestions, potential data leaking, and AI hallucination. Our findings offer implications for software engineering researchers, educators, and developers.
Related papers
- A Survey of AIOps in the Era of Large Language Models [60.59720351854515]
We analyzed 183 research papers published between January 2020 and December 2024 to answer four key research questions (RQs)<n>We discuss the state-of-the-art advancements and trends, identify gaps in existing research, and propose promising directions for future exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T02:40:16Z) - LLMs' Reshaping of People, Processes, Products, and Society in Software Development: A Comprehensive Exploration with Early Adopters [3.4069804433026314]
Large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and GitHub Copilot are rapidly gaining traction in the software industry.<n>Our study provides a nuanced understanding of how LLMs are shaping the landscape of software development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-06T22:27:05Z) - MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agents [51.9387884953294]
We introduce Meta MLGym and MLGym-Bench, a new framework and benchmark for evaluating and developing large language models on AI research tasks.<n>This is the first Gym environment for machine learning (ML) tasks, enabling research on reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for training such agents.<n>We evaluate a number of frontier large language models (LLMs) on our benchmarks such as Claude-3.5-Sonnet, Llama-3.1 405B, GPT-4o, o1-preview, and Gemini-1.5 Pro.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T12:28:23Z) - Towards Evaluation Guidelines for Empirical Studies involving LLMs [6.174354685766166]
Large language models (LLMs) have changed the software engineering research landscape.<n>This paper contributes the first set of holistic guidelines for such studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-12T09:35:23Z) - Agents in Software Engineering: Survey, Landscape, and Vision [46.021478509599895]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success and have been widely used in various downstream tasks.
We find that many studies combining LLMs with software engineering (SE) have employed the concept of agents either explicitly or implicitly.
We present a framework of LLM-based agents in SE which includes three key modules: perception, memory, and action.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-13T17:55:58Z) - Learning to Ask: When LLM Agents Meet Unclear Instruction [55.65312637965779]
Large language models (LLMs) can leverage external tools for addressing a range of tasks unattainable through language skills alone.
We evaluate the performance of LLMs tool-use under imperfect instructions, analyze the error patterns, and build a challenging tool-use benchmark called Noisy ToolBench.
We propose a novel framework, Ask-when-Needed (AwN), which prompts LLMs to ask questions to users whenever they encounter obstacles due to unclear instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-31T23:06:12Z) - An Empirical Study on Challenges for LLM Application Developers [28.69628251749012]
We crawl and analyze 29,057 relevant questions from a popular OpenAI developer forum.<n>After manually analyzing 2,364 sampled questions, we construct a taxonomy of challenges faced by LLM developers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-06T05:46:28Z) - From LLMs to LLM-based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey of Current, Challenges and Future [15.568939568441317]
We investigate the current practice and solutions for large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based agents for software engineering.
In particular we summarise six key topics: requirement engineering, code generation, autonomous decision-making, software design, test generation, and software maintenance.
We discuss the models and benchmarks used, providing a comprehensive analysis of their applications and effectiveness in software engineering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-05T14:01:15Z) - Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Survey [60.733557487886635]
Tool learning with large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising paradigm for augmenting the capabilities of LLMs to tackle highly complex problems.
Despite growing attention and rapid advancements in this field, the existing literature remains fragmented and lacks systematic organization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T08:01:26Z) - Tool Learning in the Wild: Empowering Language Models as Automatic Tool Agents [56.822238860147024]
Augmenting large language models with external tools has emerged as a promising approach to extend their utility.
Previous methods manually parse tool documentation and create in-context demonstrations, transforming tools into structured formats for LLMs to use in their step-by-step reasoning.
We propose AutoTools, a framework that enables LLMs to automate the tool-use workflow.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-26T11:40:58Z) - An Exploratory Study on Upper-Level Computing Students' Use of Large Language Models as Tools in a Semester-Long Project [2.7325338323814328]
The purpose of this study is to explore computing students' experiences and approaches to using LLMs during a semester-long software engineering project.
We collected data from a senior-level software engineering course at Purdue University.
We analyzed the data to identify themes related to students' usage patterns and learning outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-27T15:21:58Z) - What Are Tools Anyway? A Survey from the Language Model Perspective [67.18843218893416]
Language models (LMs) are powerful yet mostly for text generation tasks.
We provide a unified definition of tools as external programs used by LMs.
We empirically study the efficiency of various tooling methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-18T17:20:07Z) - Prompting Large Language Models to Tackle the Full Software Development Lifecycle: A Case Study [72.24266814625685]
We explore the performance of large language models (LLMs) across the entire software development lifecycle with DevEval.<n>DevEval features four programming languages, multiple domains, high-quality data collection, and carefully designed and verified metrics for each task.<n> Empirical studies show that current LLMs, including GPT-4, fail to solve the challenges presented within DevEval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-13T15:13:44Z) - LLMs in the Imaginarium: Tool Learning through Simulated Trial and Error [54.954211216847135]
Existing large language models (LLMs) only reach a correctness rate in the range of 30% to 60%.
We propose a biologically inspired method for tool-augmented LLMs, simulated trial and error (STE)
STE orchestrates three key mechanisms for successful tool use behaviors in the biological system: trial and error, imagination, and memory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-07T18:50:51Z) - Efficient Tool Use with Chain-of-Abstraction Reasoning [63.08202389132155]
Large language models (LLMs) need to ground their reasoning to real-world knowledge.<n>There remains challenges for fine-tuning LLM agents to invoke tools in multi-step reasoning problems.<n>We propose a new method for LLMs to better leverage tools in multi-step reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T21:53:30Z) - An Empirical Study on Usage and Perceptions of LLMs in a Software
Engineering Project [1.433758865948252]
Large Language Models (LLMs) represent a leap in artificial intelligence, excelling in tasks using human language(s)
In this paper, we analyze the AI-generated code, prompts used for code generation, and the human intervention levels to integrate the code into the code base.
Our findings suggest that LLMs can play a crucial role in the early stages of software development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T14:32:32Z) - A Survey on Large Language Models for Software Engineering [15.468484685849983]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are used to automate a broad range of Software Engineering (SE) tasks.
This paper summarizes the current state-of-the-art research in the LLM-based SE community.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-23T11:09:40Z) - Towards an Understanding of Large Language Models in Software Engineering Tasks [29.30433406449331]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have drawn widespread attention and research due to their astounding performance in text generation and reasoning tasks.<n>The evaluation and optimization of LLMs in software engineering tasks, such as code generation, have become a research focus.<n>This paper comprehensively investigate and collate the research and products combining LLMs with software engineering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-22T12:37:29Z) - Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review [34.12458948051519]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly impacted numerous domains, including Software Engineering (SE)
We select and analyze 395 research papers from January 2017 to January 2024 to answer four key research questions (RQs)
From the answers to these RQs, we discuss the current state-of-the-art and trends, identifying gaps in existing research, and flagging promising areas for future study.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-21T10:37:49Z) - Calculating Originality of LLM Assisted Source Code [0.0]
We propose a neural network-based tool to determine the original effort (and LLM's contribution) put by students in writing source codes.
Our tool is motivated by minimum description length measures like Kolmogorov complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-10T11:30:46Z) - How Can Recommender Systems Benefit from Large Language Models: A Survey [82.06729592294322]
Large language models (LLM) have shown impressive general intelligence and human-like capabilities.
We conduct a comprehensive survey on this research direction from the perspective of the whole pipeline in real-world recommender systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T11:31:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.