Ways of Seeing, and Selling, AI Art
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07685v1
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 12:44:11 GMT
- Title: Ways of Seeing, and Selling, AI Art
- Authors: Imke van Heerden,
- Abstract summary: Christie's first AI art auction drew criticism for showcasing a controversial genre.<n>Backlash could be viewed as a microcosm of AI's contested position in the creative economy.<n>This paper explores how, among social dissonance, machine learning finds its place in the artworld.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In early 2025, Augmented Intelligence - Christie's first AI art auction - drew criticism for showcasing a controversial genre. Amid wider legal uncertainty, artists voiced concerns over data mining practices, notably with respect to copyright. The backlash could be viewed as a microcosm of AI's contested position in the creative economy. Touching on the auction's presentation, reception, and results, this paper explores how, among social dissonance, machine learning finds its place in the artworld. Foregrounding responsible innovation, the paper provides a balanced perspective that champions creators' rights and brings nuance to this polarised debate. With a focus on exhibition design, it centres framing, which refers to the way a piece is presented to influence consumer perception. Context plays a central role in shaping our understanding of how good, valuable, and even ethical an artwork is. In this regard, Augmented Intelligence situates AI art within a surprisingly traditional framework, leveraging hallmarks of "high art" to establish the genre's cultural credibility. Generative AI has a clear economic dimension, converging questions of artistic merit with those of monetary worth. Scholarship on ways of seeing, or framing, could substantively inform the interpretation and evaluation of creative outputs, including assessments of their aesthetic and commercial value.
Related papers
- Compose Your Aesthetics: Empowering Text-to-Image Models with the Principles of Art [61.28133495240179]
We propose a novel task of aesthetics alignment which seeks to align user-specified aesthetics with the T2I generation output.
Inspired by how artworks provide an invaluable perspective to approach aesthetics, we codify visual aesthetics using the compositional framework artists employ.
We demonstrate that T2I DMs can effectively offer 10 compositional controls through user-specified PoA conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-15T06:58:09Z) - The Shady Light of Art Automation [0.0]
The paper summarizes a broader study of the roles that AI's conceptual and ideological substrata play in influencing art notions.<n>The focus is on divergent but coalescing and often questionable ideas, values, and political views that generative AI and other art-related AI technologies propagate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-26T12:50:05Z) - Generative AI and Creative Work: Narratives, Values, and Impacts [37.23689790286169]
We review online media outlets and analyze the dominant narratives around AI's impact on creative work that they convey.<n>We find that the discourse promotes creativity freed from its material realisation through human labor.<n>This discourse tends to correspond to the dominant techno-positivist vision and to assert power over the creative economy and culture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-06T10:26:56Z) - Diffusion-Based Visual Art Creation: A Survey and New Perspectives [51.522935314070416]
This survey explores the emerging realm of diffusion-based visual art creation, examining its development from both artistic and technical perspectives.
Our findings reveal how artistic requirements are transformed into technical challenges and highlight the design and application of diffusion-based methods within visual art creation.
We aim to shed light on the mechanisms through which AI systems emulate and possibly, enhance human capacities in artistic perception and creativity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-22T04:49:50Z) - GalleryGPT: Analyzing Paintings with Large Multimodal Models [64.98398357569765]
Artwork analysis is important and fundamental skill for art appreciation, which could enrich personal aesthetic sensibility and facilitate the critical thinking ability.
Previous works for automatically analyzing artworks mainly focus on classification, retrieval, and other simple tasks, which is far from the goal of AI.
We introduce a superior large multimodal model for painting analysis composing, dubbed GalleryGPT, which is slightly modified and fine-tuned based on LLaVA architecture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-01T11:52:56Z) - Public Opinions About Copyright for AI-Generated Art: The Role of Egocentricity, Competition, and Experience [3.072340427031969]
We study perceptions of AI-generated art through the lens of copyright law.<n>We hold an incentivized AI art competition in which some participants used a GenAI model to create art.<n>We find that participants believe creativity and effort, but not skills, are needed to create AI-generated art.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-15T08:53:43Z) - Toward an Artist-Centred AI [0.0]
This paper contextualizes the notions of suitability and desirability of principles, practices, and tools related to the use of AI in the arts.
It was composed by examining the challenges that AI poses to art production, distribution, consumption, and monetization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-13T09:43:23Z) - Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators.
The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z) - The Age of Synthetic Realities: Challenges and Opportunities [85.058932103181]
We highlight the crucial need for the development of forensic techniques capable of identifying harmful synthetic creations and distinguishing them from reality.
Our focus extends to various forms of media, such as images, videos, audio, and text, as we examine how synthetic realities are crafted and explore approaches to detecting these malicious creations.
This study is of paramount importance due to the rapid progress of AI generative techniques and their impact on the fundamental principles of Forensic Science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T15:55:10Z) - Learning to Evaluate the Artness of AI-generated Images [64.48229009396186]
ArtScore is a metric designed to evaluate the degree to which an image resembles authentic artworks by artists.
We employ pre-trained models for photo and artwork generation, resulting in a series of mixed models.
This dataset is then employed to train a neural network that learns to estimate quantized artness levels of arbitrary images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-08T17:58:27Z) - Pathway to Future Symbiotic Creativity [76.20798455931603]
We propose a classification of the creative system with a hierarchy of 5 classes, showing the pathway of creativity evolving from a mimic-human artist to a Machine artist in its own right.
In art creation, it is necessary for machines to understand humans' mental states, including desires, appreciation, and emotions, humans also need to understand machines' creative capabilities and limitations.
We propose a novel framework for building future Machine artists, which comes with the philosophy that a human-compatible AI system should be based on the "human-in-the-loop" principle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-18T15:12:02Z) - The Work of Art in an Age of Mechanical Generation [0.0]
Can we define what it means to be "creative," and if so, can our definition drive artificial intelligence systems to feats of creativity indistinguishable from human efforts?
This article considers the ability of AI to detect forgeries of renowned paintings and, in so doing, somehow reveal the quiddity of a work of art.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-27T18:32:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.