A Planning Compilation to Reason about Goal Achievement at Planning Time
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09545v2
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:33:28 GMT
- Title: A Planning Compilation to Reason about Goal Achievement at Planning Time
- Authors: Alberto Pozanco, Marianela Morales, Daniel Borrajo, Manuela Veloso,
- Abstract summary: We propose a compilation that extends the original planning task with commit actions that enforce the persistence of specific goals once achieved.<n> Experimental results indicate that solving the reformulated tasks does not incur on any additional overhead both when performing optimal and suboptimal planning.
- Score: 9.722824469961925
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Identifying the specific actions that achieve goals when solving a planning task might be beneficial for various planning applications. Traditionally, this identification occurs post-search, as some actions may temporarily achieve goals that are later undone and re-achieved by other actions. In this paper, we propose a compilation that extends the original planning task with commit actions that enforce the persistence of specific goals once achieved, allowing planners to identify permanent goal achievement during planning. Experimental results indicate that solving the reformulated tasks does not incur on any additional overhead both when performing optimal and suboptimal planning, while providing useful information for some downstream tasks.
Related papers
- Planning with Minimal Disruption [9.722824469961925]
In many planning applications, we might be interested in finding plans that minimally modify the initial state to achieve the goals.<n>In this paper, we formally introduce it, and define various planning-based compilations that aim to jointly optimize both the sum of action costs and plan disruption.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-21T08:38:17Z) - Efficient Robotic Policy Learning via Latent Space Backward Planning [17.770562202624962]
Current robotic planning methods often rely on predicting multi-frame images with full pixel details.<n>We propose a Latent Space Backward Planning scheme (LBP), which begins by grounding the task into final latent goals.<n>We show that LBP outperforms existing fine-grained and forward planning methods, achieving SOTA performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-11T06:13:51Z) - Hindsight Planner: A Closed-Loop Few-Shot Planner for Embodied Instruction Following [62.10809033451526]
This work focuses on building a task planner for Embodied Instruction Following (EIF) using Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We frame the task as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) and aim to develop a robust planner under a few-shot assumption.<n>Our experiments on the ALFRED dataset indicate that our planner achieves competitive performance under a few-shot assumption.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-27T10:05:45Z) - Propose, Assess, Search: Harnessing LLMs for Goal-Oriented Planning in Instructional Videos [48.15438373870542]
VidAssist is an integrated framework designed for zero/few-shot goal-oriented planning in instructional videos.
It employs a breadth-first search algorithm for optimal plan generation.
Experiments demonstrate that VidAssist offers a unified framework for different goal-oriented planning setups.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-30T17:57:28Z) - LASP: Surveying the State-of-the-Art in Large Language Model-Assisted AI Planning [7.36760703426119]
This survey aims to highlight the existing challenges in planning with language models.
It focuses on key areas such as embodied environments, optimal scheduling, competitive and cooperative games, task decomposition, reasoning, and planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-03T11:39:52Z) - Unified Task and Motion Planning using Object-centric Abstractions of
Motion Constraints [56.283944756315066]
We propose an alternative TAMP approach that unifies task and motion planning into a single search.
Our approach is based on an object-centric abstraction of motion constraints that permits leveraging the computational efficiency of off-the-shelf AI search to yield physically feasible plans.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-29T14:00:20Z) - Learning adaptive planning representations with natural language
guidance [90.24449752926866]
This paper describes Ada, a framework for automatically constructing task-specific planning representations.
Ada interactively learns a library of planner-compatible high-level action abstractions and low-level controllers adapted to a particular domain of planning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-13T23:35:31Z) - Hybrid Search for Efficient Planning with Completeness Guarantees [63.02803974708516]
We propose an efficient approach to augment a subgoal search method to achieve completeness in discrete action spaces.
This solution achieves the best of both worlds: the practical efficiency of high-level search and the completeness of low-level search.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T15:16:43Z) - A Planning Ontology to Represent and Exploit Planning Knowledge for Performance Efficiency [6.87593454486392]
We consider the problem of automated planning, where the objective is to find a sequence of actions that will move an agent from an initial state of the world to a desired goal state.
We hypothesize that given a large number of available planners and diverse planning domains; they carry essential information that can be leveraged to identify suitable planners and improve their performance for a domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-25T14:51:07Z) - Take a Break in the Middle: Investigating Subgoals towards Hierarchical
Script Generation [41.79944184861954]
Goal-oriented Script Generation is a new task of generating a list of steps that can fulfill the given goal.
In this paper, we propose to extend the task from the perspective of cognitive theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T12:10:06Z) - Imitating Graph-Based Planning with Goal-Conditioned Policies [72.61631088613048]
We present a self-imitation scheme which distills a subgoal-conditioned policy into the target-goal-conditioned policy.
We empirically show that our method can significantly boost the sample-efficiency of the existing goal-conditioned RL methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-20T14:51:10Z) - Discrete Factorial Representations as an Abstraction for Goal
Conditioned Reinforcement Learning [99.38163119531745]
We show that applying a discretizing bottleneck can improve performance in goal-conditioned RL setups.
We experimentally prove the expected return on out-of-distribution goals, while still allowing for specifying goals with expressive structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-01T03:31:43Z) - C-Planning: An Automatic Curriculum for Learning Goal-Reaching Tasks [133.40619754674066]
Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning can solve tasks in a wide range of domains, including navigation and manipulation.
We propose the distant goal-reaching task by using search at training time to automatically generate intermediate states.
E-step corresponds to planning an optimal sequence of waypoints using graph search, while the M-step aims to learn a goal-conditioned policy to reach those waypoints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-22T22:05:31Z) - Maximum Entropy Gain Exploration for Long Horizon Multi-goal
Reinforcement Learning [35.44552072132894]
We argue that a learning agent should set its own intrinsic goals that maximize the entropy of the historical achieved goal distribution.
We show that our strategy achieves an order of magnitude better sample efficiency than the prior state of the art on long-horizon multi-goal tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-06T15:36:05Z) - Long-Horizon Visual Planning with Goal-Conditioned Hierarchical
Predictors [124.30562402952319]
The ability to predict and plan into the future is fundamental for agents acting in the world.
Current learning approaches for visual prediction and planning fail on long-horizon tasks.
We propose a framework for visual prediction and planning that is able to overcome both of these limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-23T17:58:56Z) - Divide-and-Conquer Monte Carlo Tree Search For Goal-Directed Planning [78.65083326918351]
We consider alternatives to an implicit sequential planning assumption.
We propose Divide-and-Conquer Monte Carlo Tree Search (DC-MCTS) for approximating the optimal plan.
We show that this algorithmic flexibility over planning order leads to improved results in navigation tasks in grid-worlds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-23T18:08:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.