Uncertainty in Action: Confidence Elicitation in Embodied Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10628v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:59:41 GMT
• Title: Uncertainty in Action: Confidence Elicitation in Embodied Agents
• Abstract summary: We present the first work investigating embodied confidence elicitation in open-ended multimodal environments.<n>We introduce Elicitation Policies, which structure confidence assessment across inductive, deductive, and abductive reasoning.<n>We show that structured reasoning approaches, such as Chain-of-Thoughts, improve confidence calibration.
• Score: 7.180871428121812
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Expressing confidence is challenging for embodied agents navigating dynamic multimodal environments, where uncertainty arises from both perception and decision-making processes. We present the first work investigating embodied confidence elicitation in open-ended multimodal environments. We introduce Elicitation Policies, which structure confidence assessment across inductive, deductive, and abductive reasoning, along with Execution Policies, which enhance confidence calibration through scenario reinterpretation, action sampling, and hypothetical reasoning. Evaluating agents in calibration and failure prediction tasks within the Minecraft environment, we show that structured reasoning approaches, such as Chain-of-Thoughts, improve confidence calibration. However, our findings also reveal persistent challenges in distinguishing uncertainty, particularly under abductive settings, underscoring the need for more sophisticated embodied confidence elicitation methods.

Related papers

• Exploring Agentic Tool-Calling Decisions via Uncertainty-Aligned Reinforcement Learning [63.24624171679711]
  Large language model (LLM)-based agents often make suboptimal tool-use decisions.<n>We propose TRUST, which incorporates uncertainty quantification into reward design as a repulsive force for maintaining uncertainty separation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-05T07:08:34Z)
• Quantifying Faithful Confidence Expression in Large Reasoning Models [40.863410553607984]
  We introduce a novel framework to quantify faithful calibration of large reasoning models.<n>Our framework analyzes linguistic decisiveness relative to three sources of internal uncertainty.<n>We find that faithful confidence expression is a significant challenge for LRMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T17:53:45Z)
• Less Approximates More: Harmonizing Performance and Confidence Faithfulness via Hybrid Post-Training for High-Stakes Tasks [52.81286869496811]
  Large language models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes tasks, where confident yet incorrect inferences may cause real-world harm.<n>We propose to jointly optimize unsupervised Reinforcement Learning from Internal Feedback with reasoning-trace-guided Reasoning Distillation.<n>We introduce HyTuning, a hybrid post-training framework that adaptively reweights RD and RLIF via a PRG-style metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T16:50:11Z)
• Verify Before You Commit: Towards Faithful Reasoning in LLM Agents via Self-Auditing [5.497064111008921]
  We propose textbfSelf-textbfAudited textbfVerified textbfReasoning (textscSAVeR), a novel framework that enforces verification over internal belief states within the agent before action commitment.<n>Our approach consistently improves reasoning faithfulness while preserving competitive end-task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T16:01:03Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Generative Recommendation [52.0751022792023]
  Uncertainty-aware Generative Recommendation (UGR) is a unified framework that leverages uncertainty as a critical signal for adaptive optimization.<n>UGR not only yields superior recommendation performance but also fundamentally stabilizes training, preventing the performance degradation often observed in standard methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T08:48:51Z)
• Confidence Estimation for LLMs in Multi-turn Interactions [48.081802290688394]
  This work presents the first systematic study of confidence estimation in multi-turn interactions.<n>We establish a formal evaluation framework grounded in two key desideratas: per-turn calibration and monotonicity of confidence.<n>Our work provides a foundational methodology for developing more reliable and trustworthy conversational agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T14:58:04Z)
• Beware of Reasoning Overconfidence: Pitfalls in the Reasoning Process for Multi-solution Tasks [54.31998314008198]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in reasoning tasks requiring a single correct answer, but they perform poorly in multi-solution tasks.<n>We attribute this limitation to textbfreasoning overconfidence: a tendency to express undue certainty in an incomplete solution set.<n>We propose the textbfcognitive-rigidity hypothesis, which posits that overconfidence arises when the reasoning process prematurely converges on a narrow set of thought paths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T14:35:06Z)
• Learning to Trust: Bayesian Adaptation to Varying Suggester Reliability in Sequential Decision Making [28.742690356257157]
  We introduce a framework that learns and adapts to varying suggester reliability in partially observable environments.<n>First, we integrate suggester quality directly into the agent's belief representation, enabling agents to infer and adjust their reliance on suggestions.<n>Second, we introduce an explicit ask'' action allowing agents to strategically request suggestions at critical moments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T22:50:20Z)
• BrowseConf: Confidence-Guided Test-Time Scaling for Web Agents [58.05949210993854]
  We investigate whether search agents have the ability to communicate their own confidence through verbalized confidence scores after long sequences of actions.<n>We propose Test-Time Scaling (TTS) methods that use confidence scores to determine answer quality, encourage the model to try again until reaching a satisfactory confidence level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T15:58:51Z)
• ADVICE: Answer-Dependent Verbalized Confidence Estimation [7.331438721730309]
  We conduct a detailed analysis of the dynamics underlying verbalized confidence.<n>We identify answer-independence as a key factor, defined as the model's failure to condition confidence on its own answer.<n>We propose a fine-tuning framework that facilitates answer-grounded confidence estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T02:18:33Z)
• FaithCoT-Bench: Benchmarking Instance-Level Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [62.452350134196934]
  FaithCoT-Bench is a unified benchmark for instance-level CoT unfaithfulness detection.<n>Our framework formulates unfaithfulness detection as a discriminative decision problem.<n>FaithCoT-Bench sets a solid basis for future research toward more interpretable and trustworthy reasoning in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T05:16:54Z)
• Mind the Generation Process: Fine-Grained Confidence Estimation During LLM Generation [63.49409574310576]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit overconfidence, assigning high confidence scores to incorrect predictions.<n>We introduce FineCE, a novel confidence estimation method that delivers accurate, fine-grained confidence scores during text generation.<n>Our code and all baselines used in the paper are available on GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-16T13:29:35Z)
• Risk-Averse Best Arm Set Identification with Fixed Budget and Fixed Confidence [0.562479170374811]
  We introduce a novel problem setting in bandit optimization that addresses maximizing expected reward and minimizing associated uncertainty.<n>We propose a unified meta-budgetalgorithmic framework capable of operating under both fixed-confidence and fixed-optimal regimes.<n>Our approach outperforms existing methods in terms of both accuracy and sample efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T14:21:03Z)
• Temporalizing Confidence: Evaluation of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Signal Temporal Logic [0.12499537119440243]
  We propose a structured framework that models stepwise confidence as a temporal signal and evaluates it using Signal Temporal Logic (STL)<n>In particular, we define formal STL-based constraints to capture desirable temporal properties and compute scores that serve as structured, interpretable confidence estimates.<n>Our approach consistently improves calibration metrics and provides more reliable uncertainty estimates than conventional confidence aggregation and post-hoc calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T21:21:12Z)
• Verbalized Confidence Triggers Self-Verification: Emergent Behavior Without Explicit Reasoning Supervision [12.287123198288079]
  Uncertainty calibration is essential for the safe deployment of large language models (LLMs)<n>We find that supervised fine-tuning with scalar confidence labels alone suffices to elicit self-verification behavior of language models.<n>We propose a simple rethinking method that boosts performance via test-time scaling based on calibrated uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T08:56:24Z)
• ConCISE: Confidence-guided Compression in Step-by-step Efficient Reasoning [75.1101108949743]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) perform strongly in complex reasoning tasks via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting.<n>LRMs often suffer from verbose outputs caused by redundant content, increasing computational overhead, and degrading user experience.<n>We propose ConCISE, a framework that simplifies reasoning chains by reinforcing the model's confidence during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T01:40:40Z)
• SConU: Selective Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models [59.25881667640868]
  We propose a novel approach termed Selective Conformal Uncertainty (SConU) We develop two conformal p-values that are instrumental in determining whether a given sample deviates from the uncertainty distribution of the calibration set at a specific manageable risk level. Our approach not only facilitates rigorous management of miscoverage rates across both single-domain and interdisciplinary contexts, but also enhances the efficiency of predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-19T03:01:45Z)
• Know Where You're Uncertain When Planning with Multimodal Foundation Models: A Formal Framework [54.40508478482667]
  We present a comprehensive framework to disentangle, quantify, and mitigate uncertainty in perception and plan generation. We propose methods tailored to the unique properties of perception and decision-making. We show that our uncertainty disentanglement framework reduces variability by up to 40% and enhances task success rates by 5% compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T17:32:00Z)
• InternalInspector $I^2$: Robust Confidence Estimation in LLMs through Internal States [44.78029091831383]
  InternalInspector is a framework designed to enhance confidence estimation in Large Language Models (LLMs) Unlike existing methods that primarily focus on the final activation state, InternalInspector conducts a comprehensive analysis across all internal states of every layer to accurately identify both correct and incorrect prediction processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T19:46:05Z)
• Confidence Under the Hood: An Investigation into the Confidence-Probability Alignment in Large Language Models [14.5291643644017]
  We introduce the concept of Confidence-Probability Alignment. We probe the alignment between models' internal and expressed confidence. Among the models analyzed, OpenAI's GPT-4 showed the strongest confidence-probability alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T15:42:04Z)
• When to Trust LLMs: Aligning Confidence with Response Quality [49.371218210305656]
  We propose CONfidence-Quality-ORDer-preserving alignment approach (CONQORD) It integrates quality reward and order-preserving alignment reward functions. Experiments demonstrate that CONQORD significantly improves the alignment performance between confidence and response accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T09:42:46Z)
• Think Twice Before Trusting: Self-Detection for Large Language Models through Comprehensive Answer Reflection [90.71323430635593]
  We propose a novel self-detection paradigm that considers the comprehensive answer space beyond LLM-generated answers. Building upon this paradigm, we introduce a two-step framework, which firstly instructs LLM to reflect and provide justifications for each candidate answer. This framework can be seamlessly integrated with existing approaches for superior self-detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T02:38:26Z)
• Revisiting Confidence Estimation: Towards Reliable Failure Prediction [53.79160907725975]
  We find a general, widely existing but actually-neglected phenomenon that most confidence estimation methods are harmful for detecting misclassification errors. We propose to enlarge the confidence gap by finding flat minima, which yields state-of-the-art failure prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T11:44:14Z)
• Toward Reliable Human Pose Forecasting with Uncertainty [51.628234388046195]
  We develop an open-source library for human pose forecasting, including multiple models, supporting several datasets. We devise two types of uncertainty in the problem to increase performance and convey better trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-13T17:56:08Z)
• Trust, but Verify: Using Self-Supervised Probing to Improve Trustworthiness [29.320691367586004]
  We introduce a new approach of self-supervised probing, which enables us to check and mitigate the overconfidence issue for a trained model. We provide a simple yet effective framework, which can be flexibly applied to existing trustworthiness-related methods in a plug-and-play manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T08:57:20Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification for Competency Assessment of Autonomous Agents [3.3517146652431378]
  autonomous agents must elicit appropriate levels of trust from human users. One method to build trust is to have agents assess and communicate their own competencies for performing given tasks. We show how ensembles of deep generative models can be used to quantify the agent's aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T17:35:13Z)
• An evaluation of word-level confidence estimation for end-to-end automatic speech recognition [70.61280174637913]
  We investigate confidence estimation for end-to-end automatic speech recognition (ASR) We provide an extensive benchmark of popular confidence methods on four well-known speech datasets. Our results suggest a strong baseline can be obtained by scaling the logits by a learnt temperature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-14T09:51:59Z)
• Reliable Off-policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning [53.486680020852724]
  In a sequential decision-making problem, off-policy evaluation estimates the expected cumulative reward of a target policy. We propose a novel framework that provides robust and optimistic cumulative reward estimates using one or multiple logged data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-08T23:16:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.