Harnessing the Intrinsic Knowledge of Pretrained Language Models for Challenging Text Classification Settings
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15650v1
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:07:30 GMT
- Title: Harnessing the Intrinsic Knowledge of Pretrained Language Models for Challenging Text Classification Settings
- Authors: Lingyu Gao,
- Abstract summary: This thesis explores three challenging settings in text classification by leveraging the intrinsic knowledge of pretrained language models (PLMs)
We develop models that utilize features based on contextualized word representations from PLMs, achieving performance that rivals or surpasses human accuracy.
Lastly, we tackle the sensitivity of large language models to in-context learning prompts by selecting effective demonstrations.
- Score: 5.257719744958367
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Text classification is crucial for applications such as sentiment analysis and toxic text filtering, but it still faces challenges due to the complexity and ambiguity of natural language. Recent advancements in deep learning, particularly transformer architectures and large-scale pretraining, have achieved inspiring success in NLP fields. Building on these advancements, this thesis explores three challenging settings in text classification by leveraging the intrinsic knowledge of pretrained language models (PLMs). Firstly, to address the challenge of selecting misleading yet incorrect distractors for cloze questions, we develop models that utilize features based on contextualized word representations from PLMs, achieving performance that rivals or surpasses human accuracy. Secondly, to enhance model generalization to unseen labels, we create small finetuning datasets with domain-independent task label descriptions, improving model performance and robustness. Lastly, we tackle the sensitivity of large language models to in-context learning prompts by selecting effective demonstrations, focusing on misclassified examples and resolving model ambiguity regarding test example labels.
Related papers
- SciPrompt: Knowledge-augmented Prompting for Fine-grained Categorization of Scientific Topics [2.3742710594744105]
We introduce SciPrompt, a framework designed to automatically retrieve scientific topic-related terms for low-resource text classification tasks.
Our method outperforms state-of-the-art, prompt-based fine-tuning methods on scientific text classification tasks under few and zero-shot settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T18:45:04Z) - We're Calling an Intervention: Exploring the Fundamental Hurdles in Adapting Language Models to Nonstandard Text [8.956635443376527]
We present a suite of experiments that allow us to understand the underlying challenges of language model adaptation to nonstandard text.
We do so by designing interventions that approximate several types of linguistic variation and their interactions with existing biases of language models.
Applying our interventions during language model adaptation with varying size and nature of training data, we gain important insights into when knowledge transfer can be successful.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T18:56:53Z) - Language Models for Text Classification: Is In-Context Learning Enough? [54.869097980761595]
Recent foundational language models have shown state-of-the-art performance in many NLP tasks in zero- and few-shot settings.
An advantage of these models over more standard approaches is the ability to understand instructions written in natural language (prompts)
This makes them suitable for addressing text classification problems for domains with limited amounts of annotated instances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-26T12:47:39Z) - ABINet++: Autonomous, Bidirectional and Iterative Language Modeling for
Scene Text Spotting [121.11880210592497]
We argue that the limited capacity of language models comes from 1) implicit language modeling; 2) unidirectional feature representation; and 3) language model with noise input.
We propose an autonomous, bidirectional and iterative ABINet++ for scene text spotting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-19T03:50:33Z) - Leveraging Natural Supervision for Language Representation Learning and
Generation [8.083109555490475]
We describe three lines of work that seek to improve the training and evaluation of neural models using naturally-occurring supervision.
We first investigate self-supervised training losses to help enhance the performance of pretrained language models for various NLP tasks.
We propose a framework that uses paraphrase pairs to disentangle semantics and syntax in sentence representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-21T17:26:03Z) - Analyzing the Limits of Self-Supervision in Handling Bias in Language [52.26068057260399]
We evaluate how well language models capture the semantics of four tasks for bias: diagnosis, identification, extraction and rephrasing.
Our analyses indicate that language models are capable of performing these tasks to widely varying degrees across different bias dimensions, such as gender and political affiliation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-16T05:36:08Z) - Few-shot Named Entity Recognition with Cloze Questions [3.561183926088611]
We propose a simple and intuitive adaptation of Pattern-Exploiting Training (PET), a recent approach which combines the cloze-questions mechanism and fine-tuning for few-shot learning.
Our approach achieves considerably better performance than standard fine-tuning and comparable or improved results with respect to other few-shot baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-24T11:08:59Z) - To Augment or Not to Augment? A Comparative Study on Text Augmentation
Techniques for Low-Resource NLP [0.0]
We investigate three categories of text augmentation methodologies which perform changes on the syntax.
We compare them on part-of-speech tagging, dependency parsing and semantic role labeling for a diverse set of language families.
Our results suggest that the augmentation techniques can further improve over strong baselines based on mBERT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-18T10:52:48Z) - AES Systems Are Both Overstable And Oversensitive: Explaining Why And
Proposing Defenses [66.49753193098356]
We investigate the reason behind the surprising adversarial brittleness of scoring models.
Our results indicate that autoscoring models, despite getting trained as "end-to-end" models, behave like bag-of-words models.
We propose detection-based protection models that can detect oversensitivity and overstability causing samples with high accuracies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-24T03:49:38Z) - Sentiment analysis in tweets: an assessment study from classical to
modern text representation models [59.107260266206445]
Short texts published on Twitter have earned significant attention as a rich source of information.
Their inherent characteristics, such as the informal, and noisy linguistic style, remain challenging to many natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
This study fulfils an assessment of existing language models in distinguishing the sentiment expressed in tweets by using a rich collection of 22 datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-29T21:05:28Z) - Grounded Compositional Outputs for Adaptive Language Modeling [59.02706635250856]
A language model's vocabulary$-$typically selected before training and permanently fixed later$-$affects its size.
We propose a fully compositional output embedding layer for language models.
To our knowledge, the result is the first word-level language model with a size that does not depend on the training vocabulary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-24T07:21:14Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.