Who Relies More on World Knowledge and Bias for Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution: Humans or LLMs?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10838v2
• Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:35:30 GMT
• Title: Who Relies More on World Knowledge and Bias for Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution: Humans or LLMs?
• Authors: So Young Lee, Russell Scheinberg, Amber Shore, Ameeta Agrawal,
• Abstract summary: This study explores how recent large language models (LLMs) navigate relative clause attachment ambiguity in six typologically diverse languages.
• Score: 2.3749120526936465
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study explores how recent large language models (LLMs) navigate relative clause attachment {ambiguity} and use world knowledge biases for disambiguation in six typologically diverse languages: English, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Russian, and Spanish. We describe the process of creating a novel dataset -- MultiWho -- for fine-grained evaluation of relative clause attachment preferences in ambiguous and unambiguous contexts. Our experiments with three LLMs indicate that, contrary to humans, LLMs consistently exhibit a preference for local attachment, displaying limited responsiveness to syntactic variations or language-specific attachment patterns. Although LLMs performed well in unambiguous cases, they rigidly prioritized world knowledge biases, lacking the flexibility of human language processing. These findings highlight the need for more diverse, pragmatically nuanced multilingual training to improve LLMs' handling of complex structures and human-like comprehension.

Related papers

• Linguistic Blind Spots of Large Language Models [14.755831733659699]
  We study the performance of recent large language models (LLMs) on linguistic annotation tasks. We find that recent LLMs show limited efficacy in addressing linguistic queries and often struggle with linguistically complex inputs. Our results provide insights to inform future advancements in LLM design and development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T01:47:13Z)
• Disparities in LLM Reasoning Accuracy and Explanations: A Case Study on African American English [66.97110551643722]
  We investigate dialectal disparities in Large Language Models (LLMs) reasoning tasks.<n>We find that LLMs produce less accurate responses and simpler reasoning chains and explanations for AAE inputs.<n>These findings highlight systematic differences in how LLMs process and reason about different language varieties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T05:15:34Z)
• Multilingual Relative Clause Attachment Ambiguity Resolution in Large Language Models [2.3749120526936465]
  Large language models (LLMs) resolve relative clause (RC) attachment ambiguities.<n>We assess whether LLMs can achieve human-like interpretations amid the complexities of language.<n>We evaluate models in English, Spanish, French, German, Japanese, and Korean.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T19:56:56Z)
• How does a Multilingual LM Handle Multiple Languages? [0.0]
  This study critically examines capabilities in multilingual understanding, semantic representation, and cross-lingual knowledge transfer.<n>It assesses semantic similarity by analyzing multilingual word embeddings for consistency using cosine similarity.<n>It examines BLOOM-1.7B and Qwen2 through Named Entity Recognition and sentence similarity tasks to understand their linguistic structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T18:08:14Z)
• LLM for Everyone: Representing the Underrepresented in Large Language Models [21.07409393578553]
  This thesis aims to bridge the gap in NLP research and development by focusing on underrepresented languages. A comprehensive evaluation of large language models (LLMs) is conducted to assess their capabilities in these languages. The proposed solutions cover cross-lingual continual instruction tuning, retrieval-based cross-lingual in-context learning, and in-context query alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T20:53:22Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Language Confusion in LLMs [76.96033035093204]
  We evaluate 15 typologically diverse languages with existing and newly-created English and multilingual prompts. We find that Llama Instruct and Mistral models exhibit high degrees of language confusion. We find that language confusion can be partially mitigated via few-shot prompting, multilingual SFT and preference tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T17:03:51Z)
• Crosslingual Capabilities and Knowledge Barriers in Multilingual Large Language Models [62.91524967852552]
  Large language models (LLMs) are typically multilingual due to pretraining on diverse multilingual corpora.<n>But can these models relate corresponding concepts across languages, i.e., be crosslingual?<n>This study evaluates state-of-the-art LLMs on inherently crosslingual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T15:15:17Z)
• MindMerger: Efficient Boosting LLM Reasoning in non-English Languages [26.334092384176518]
  Reasoning capabilities are crucial for Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose MindMerger, which merges LLMs with the external language understanding capabilities from multilingual models. MindMerger consistently outperforms all baselines, especially in low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T17:41:54Z)
• A Survey on Large Language Models with Multilingualism: Recent Advances and New Frontiers [51.8203871494146]
  The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrates remarkable multilingual capabilities in natural language processing. Despite the breakthroughs of LLMs, the investigation into the multilingual scenario remains insufficient. This survey aims to help the research community address multilingual problems and provide a comprehensive understanding of the core concepts, key techniques, and latest developments in multilingual natural language processing based on LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T17:47:39Z)
• Is Translation All You Need? A Study on Solving Multilingual Tasks with Large Language Models [79.46179534911019]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated multilingual capabilities, yet they are mostly English-centric due to imbalanced training corpora. We extend the evaluation to real-world user queries and non-English-centric LLMs, offering a broader examination of multilingual performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T12:47:39Z)
• FAC$^2$E: Better Understanding Large Language Model Capabilities by Dissociating Language and Cognition [56.76951887823882]
  Large language models (LLMs) are primarily evaluated by overall performance on various text understanding and generation tasks. We present FAC$2$E, a framework for Fine-grAined and Cognition-grounded LLMs' Capability Evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T21:05:37Z)
• How do Large Language Models Handle Multilingualism? [81.15060972112563]
  This study explores how large language models (LLMs) handle multilingualism. LLMs initially understand the query, converting multilingual inputs into English for task-solving. In the intermediate layers, they employ English for thinking and incorporate multilingual knowledge with self-attention and feed-forward structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T02:55:26Z)
• Don't Trust ChatGPT when Your Question is not in English: A Study of Multilingual Abilities and Types of LLMs [16.770697902481107]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional natural language understanding abilities. We propose a systematic way of qualifying the performance disparities of LLMs under multilingual settings. The results show that GPT exhibits highly translating-like behaviour in multilingual settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T02:05:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.