Measuring Similarity in Causal Graphs: A Framework for Semantic and Structural Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11046v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 03:29:26 GMT
• Title: Measuring Similarity in Causal Graphs: A Framework for Semantic and Structural Analysis
• Authors: Ning-Yuan Georgia Liu, Flower Yang, Mohammad S. Jalali,
• Abstract summary: Causal graphs are commonly used to understand and model complex systems.<n>Researchers often construct these graphs from different perspectives, leading to significant variations for the same problem.<n>Despite its importance, research on causal graph comparison remains scarce.
• Score: 0.7373617024876725
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Causal graphs are commonly used to understand and model complex systems. Researchers often construct these graphs from different perspectives, leading to significant variations for the same problem. Comparing causal graphs is, therefore, essential for evaluating assumptions, integrating insights, and resolving disagreements. The rise of AI tools has further amplified this need, as they are increasingly used to generate hypothesized causal graphs by synthesizing information from various sources such as prior research and community inputs, providing the potential for automating and scaling causal modeling for complex systems. Similar to humans, these tools also produce inconsistent results across platforms, versions, and iterations. Despite its importance, research on causal graph comparison remains scarce. Existing methods often focus solely on structural similarities, assuming identical variable names, and fail to capture nuanced semantic relationships, which is essential for causal graph comparison. We address these gaps by investigating methods for comparing causal graphs from both semantic and structural perspectives. First, we reviewed over 40 existing metrics and, based on predefined criteria, selected nine for evaluation from two threads of machine learning: four semantic similarity metrics and five learning graph kernels. We discuss the usability of these metrics in simple examples to illustrate their strengths and limitations. We then generated a synthetic dataset of 2,000 causal graphs using generative AI based on a reference diagram. Our findings reveal that each metric captures a different aspect of similarity, highlighting the need to use multiple metrics.

Related papers

• GraphIC: A Graph-Based In-Context Example Retrieval Model for Multi-Step Reasoning [22.115256310400817]
  In-context learning (ICL) enhances large language models (LLMs) by incorporating demonstration examples.<n>Current methods typically use text embeddings to measure semantic similarity, which often introduces bias in multi-step reasoning tasks.<n>We propose GraphIC, a graph-based retrieval model that leverages reasoning-aware representation and specialized similarity metric for in-context example retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T04:33:02Z)
• Visual Analysis of Multi-outcome Causal Graphs [21.406338910685232]
  We introduce a visual analysis method for multiple causal graphs with different outcome variables, namely, multi-outcome causal graphs. We collaborated with medical experts to devise two comparative visualization techniques at different stages of the analysis process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T08:44:34Z)
• Multi-Scale Subgraph Contrastive Learning [9.972544118719572]
  We propose a multi-scale subgraph contrastive learning architecture which is able to characterize the fine-grained semantic information. Specifically, we generate global and local views at different scales based on subgraph sampling, and construct multiple contrastive relationships according to their semantic associations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T07:17:18Z)
• Separation-based distance measures for causal graphs [15.37737222790121]
  State-of-the-art causal discovery methods do not output single causal graphs, but rather their equivalence classes (MECs) We propose additional measures of distance that capture the difference in separations distances are not fit to assess. We complement our theoretical analysis with toy examples and empirical experiments that highlight the differences to existing comparison metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T15:36:53Z)
• Bures-Wasserstein Means of Graphs [60.42414991820453]
  We propose a novel framework for defining a graph mean via embeddings in the space of smooth graph signal distributions. By finding a mean in this embedding space, we can recover a mean graph that preserves structural information. We establish the existence and uniqueness of the novel graph mean, and provide an iterative algorithm for computing it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T11:04:53Z)
• CLEAR: Generative Counterfactual Explanations on Graphs [60.30009215290265]
  We study the problem of counterfactual explanation generation on graphs. A few studies have explored counterfactual explanations on graphs, but many challenges of this problem are still not well-addressed. We propose a novel framework CLEAR which aims to generate counterfactual explanations on graphs for graph-level prediction models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-16T04:35:32Z)
• Graph Self-supervised Learning with Accurate Discrepancy Learning [64.69095775258164]
  We propose a framework that aims to learn the exact discrepancy between the original and the perturbed graphs, coined as Discrepancy-based Self-supervised LeArning (D-SLA) We validate our method on various graph-related downstream tasks, including molecular property prediction, protein function prediction, and link prediction tasks, on which our model largely outperforms relevant baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T08:04:59Z)
• Joint Graph Learning and Matching for Semantic Feature Correspondence [69.71998282148762]
  We propose a joint emphgraph learning and matching network, named GLAM, to explore reliable graph structures for boosting graph matching. The proposed method is evaluated on three popular visual matching benchmarks (Pascal VOC, Willow Object and SPair-71k) It outperforms previous state-of-the-art graph matching methods by significant margins on all benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T08:24:02Z)
• Systematic Evaluation of Causal Discovery in Visual Model Based Reinforcement Learning [76.00395335702572]
  A central goal for AI and causality is the joint discovery of abstract representations and causal structure. Existing environments for studying causal induction are poorly suited for this objective because they have complicated task-specific causal graphs. In this work, our goal is to facilitate research in learning representations of high-level variables as well as causal structures among them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T05:44:56Z)
• ExplaGraphs: An Explanation Graph Generation Task for Structured Commonsense Reasoning [65.15423587105472]
  We present a new generative and structured commonsense-reasoning task (and an associated dataset) of explanation graph generation for stance prediction. Specifically, given a belief and an argument, a model has to predict whether the argument supports or counters the belief and also generate a commonsense-augmented graph that serves as non-trivial, complete, and unambiguous explanation for the predicted stance. A significant 83% of our graphs contain external commonsense nodes with diverse structures and reasoning depths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T17:51:36Z)
• Auto-decoding Graphs [91.3755431537592]
  The generative model is an auto-decoder that learns to synthesize graphs from latent codes. Graphs are synthesized using self-attention modules that are trained to identify likely connectivity patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T14:23:01Z)
• Out-of-Sample Representation Learning for Multi-Relational Graphs [8.956321788625894]
  We study the out-of-sample representation learning problem for non-attributed knowledge graphs. We create benchmark datasets for this task, develop several models and baselines, and provide empirical analyses and comparisons of the proposed models and baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T00:53:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.