Integration of Explainable AI Techniques with Large Language Models for Enhanced Interpretability for Sentiment Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11948v1
• Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 01:37:54 GMT
• Title: Integration of Explainable AI Techniques with Large Language Models for Enhanced Interpretability for Sentiment Analysis
• Authors: Thivya Thogesan, Anupiya Nugaliyadde, Kok Wai Wong,
• Abstract summary: Interpretability remains a key difficulty in sentiment analysis with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>This research introduces a technique that applies SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) by breaking down LLMs into components such as embedding layer,encoder,decoder and attention layer.<n>The method is evaluated using the Stanford Sentiment Treebank (SST-2) dataset, which shows how different sentences affect different layers.
• Score: 0.5120567378386615
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Interpretability remains a key difficulty in sentiment analysis with Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly in high-stakes applications where it is crucial to comprehend the rationale behind forecasts. This research addressed this by introducing a technique that applies SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) by breaking down LLMs into components such as embedding layer,encoder,decoder and attention layer to provide a layer-by-layer knowledge of sentiment prediction. The approach offers a clearer overview of how model interpret and categorise sentiment by breaking down LLMs into these parts. The method is evaluated using the Stanford Sentiment Treebank (SST-2) dataset, which shows how different sentences affect different layers. The effectiveness of layer-wise SHAP analysis in clarifying sentiment-specific token attributions is demonstrated by experimental evaluations, which provide a notable enhancement over current whole-model explainability techniques. These results highlight how the suggested approach could improve the reliability and transparency of LLM-based sentiment analysis in crucial applications.

Related papers

• Multimodal Behavioral Patterns Analysis with Eye-Tracking and LLM-Based Reasoning [12.054910727620154]
  Eye-tracking data reveals valuable insights into users' cognitive states but is difficult to analyze due to its structured, non-linguistic nature.<n>This paper presents a multimodal human-AI collaborative framework designed to enhance cognitive pattern extraction from eye-tracking signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T09:49:53Z)
• Unveiling Decision-Making in LLMs for Text Classification : Extraction of influential and interpretable concepts with Sparse Autoencoders [0.0]
  We present a novel SAE-based architecture tailored for text classification.<n>We benchmark this architecture against established methods such as ConceptShap, Independent Component Analysis, and other SAE-based concept extraction techniques.<n>Our empirical results show that our architecture improves both the causality and interpretability of the extracted features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T15:18:50Z)
• Large Language Models Enhanced by Plug and Play Syntactic Knowledge for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis [18.58619664067155]
  Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) generally requires a deep understanding of the contextual information.<n>We propose a memory module that records syntactic information and is incorporated into language models (LLMs) to instruct the prediction of sentiment polarities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-15T23:16:12Z)
• How do Large Language Models Understand Relevance? A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspective [64.00022624183781]
  Large language models (LLMs) can assess relevance and support information retrieval (IR) tasks. We investigate how different LLM modules contribute to relevance judgment through the lens of mechanistic interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:14:55Z)
• Semantic Consistency Regularization with Large Language Models for Semi-supervised Sentiment Analysis [20.503153899462323]
  We propose a framework for semi-supervised sentiment analysis.<n>We introduce two prompting strategies to semantically enhance unlabeled text.<n> Experiments show our method achieves remarkable performance over prior semi-supervised methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T12:03:11Z)
• Understanding Ranking LLMs: A Mechanistic Analysis for Information Retrieval [20.353393773305672]
  We employ a probing-based analysis to examine neuron activations in ranking LLMs.<n>Our study spans a broad range of feature categories, including lexical signals, document structure, query-document interactions, and complex semantic representations.<n>Our findings offer crucial insights for developing more transparent and reliable retrieval systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T08:20:10Z)
• CogSteer: Cognition-Inspired Selective Layer Intervention for Efficiently Steering Large Language Models [37.476241509187304]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve remarkable performance through pretraining on extensive data.<n>The lack of interpretability in their underlying mechanisms limits the ability to effectively steer LLMs for specific applications.<n>In this work, we investigate the mechanisms of LLMs from a cognitive perspective using eye movement measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T09:40:15Z)
• Investigating Layer Importance in Large Language Models [28.156622049937216]
  Large language models (LLMs) have gained increasing attention due to their prominent ability to understand and process texts. The lack of understanding of LLMs has obstructed the deployment in safety-critical scenarios and hindered the development of better models. This study identifies cornerstone layers in LLMs and underscores their critical role for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-22T09:53:13Z)
• Evaluating Human Alignment and Model Faithfulness of LLM Rationale [66.75309523854476]
  We study how well large language models (LLMs) explain their generations through rationales. We show that prompting-based methods are less "faithful" than attribution-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T20:06:30Z)
• Comprehensive Reassessment of Large-Scale Evaluation Outcomes in LLMs: A Multifaceted Statistical Approach [64.42462708687921]
  Evaluations have revealed that factors such as scaling, training types, architectures and other factors profoundly impact the performance of LLMs. Our study embarks on a thorough re-examination of these LLMs, targeting the inadequacies in current evaluation methods. This includes the application of ANOVA, Tukey HSD tests, GAMM, and clustering technique.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T14:47:35Z)
• LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights [62.92811060490876]
  Large Language Model (LLM) inference is rapidly evolving, presenting a unique blend of opportunities and challenges. Our survey stands out from traditional literature reviews by not only summarizing the current state of research but also by introducing a framework based on roofline model. This framework identifies the bottlenecks when deploying LLMs on hardware devices and provides a clear understanding of practical problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T07:33:05Z)
• Sparsity-Guided Holistic Explanation for LLMs with Interpretable Inference-Time Intervention [53.896974148579346]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unprecedented breakthroughs in various natural language processing domains. The enigmatic black-box'' nature of LLMs remains a significant challenge for interpretability, hampering transparent and accountable applications. We propose a novel methodology anchored in sparsity-guided techniques, aiming to provide a holistic interpretation of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T19:55:58Z)
• Arabic Sentiment Analysis with Noisy Deep Explainable Model [48.22321420680046]
  This paper proposes an explainable sentiment classification framework for the Arabic language. The proposed framework can explain specific predictions by training a local surrogate explainable model. We carried out experiments on public benchmark Arabic SA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-24T19:26:53Z)
• Towards Understanding In-Context Learning with Contrastive Demonstrations and Saliency Maps [7.342347950764399]
  We investigate the role of various demonstration components in the in-context learning performance of large language models (LLMs) Specifically, we explore the impacts of ground-truth labels, input distribution, and complementary explanations, particularly when these are altered or perturbed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T07:03:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.