The "recognition," "belief," and "action" regarding conspiracy theories: An empirical study using large-scale samples from Japan and the United States

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12166v1
• Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 15:10:58 GMT
• Title: The "recognition," "belief," and "action" regarding conspiracy theories: An empirical study using large-scale samples from Japan and the United States
• Authors: Taichi Murayama, Dongwoo Lim, Akira Matsui, Tsukasa Tanihara,
• Abstract summary: We identify the key social, political, and economic factors that drive engagement at each stage.<n>We find that recognition serves as a crucial gateway determining who transitions to belief.<n> Demonstrative actions are more prevalent among younger, higher-status individuals with strong political alignments.
• Score: 0.5899238062240166
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Conspiracy theories present significant societal challenges, shaping political behavior, eroding public trust, and disrupting social cohesion. Addressing their impact requires recognizing that conspiracy engagement is not a singular act but a multi-stage process involving distinct cognitive and behavioral transitions. In this study, we investigate this sequential progression, "recognition," "belief," and "action" (demonstrative action and diffusion action), using nationally representative surveys from the United States (N=13,578) and Japan (N=16,693). Applying a Bayesian hierarchical model, we identify the key social, political, and economic factors that drive engagement at each stage, providing a structured framework for understanding the mechanisms underlying conspiracy theory adoption and dissemination. We find that recognition serves as a crucial gateway determining who transitions to belief, and that demonstrative and diffusion actions are shaped by distinct factors. Demonstrative actions are more prevalent among younger, higher-status individuals with strong political alignments, whereas diffusion actions occur across broader demographics, particularly among those engaged with diverse media channels. Our findings further reveal that early-life economic and cultural capital significantly influence the shape of conspiratorial engagement, emphasizing the role of life-course experiences. These insights highlight the necessity of distinguishing between different forms of conspiracy engagement and highlight the importance of targeted interventions that account for structural, cultural, and psychological factors to mitigate their spread and societal impact.

Related papers

• Measuring Vogue in American Sociology (2011-2020) [0.0]
  We show that applied research topics, such as crime and health, serve as the primary driving force behind the emergence and diffusion of trends within the discipline. This work sheds light on the institutional mechanisms that govern knowledge production, demonstrating that sociology's intellectual landscape is not dictated by simple top-down diffusion from elite institutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-22T19:29:12Z)
• Emergence of human-like polarization among large language model agents [61.622596148368906]
  We simulate a networked system involving thousands of large language model agents, discovering their social interactions, result in human-like polarization.<n>Similarities between humans and LLM agents raise concerns about their capacity to amplify societal polarization, but also hold the potential to serve as a valuable testbed for identifying plausible strategies to mitigate it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T11:45:05Z)
• Narratives of Collective Action in YouTube's Discourse on Veganism [0.0]
  We use natural language processing to operationalize a theoretical framework of moral narratives specific to the vegan movement. Our analysis reveals that several narrative types, as defined by the theory, are empirically present in the data. Video narratives advocating social fight, whether through protest or through efforts to convert others to the cause, are associated with a stronger sense of collective action in the respective comments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T13:44:36Z)
• What is the disinformation problem? Reviewing the dominant paradigm and motivating an alternative sociopolitical view [0.0]
  This article contributes to a growing field by reviewing prevalent U.S. disinformation discourse. It analyzes cross-disciplinary discourse about the content, individual, group, and institutional layers of the problem. It concludes by putting forth an alternative, sociopolitical paradigm that allows subjective models of the world to govern rationality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T16:34:31Z)
• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Reconciling Predictive and Statistical Parity: A Causal Approach [68.59381759875734]
  We propose a new causal decomposition formula for the fairness measures associated with predictive parity. We show that the notions of statistical and predictive parity are not really mutually exclusive, but complementary and spanning a spectrum of fairness notions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T09:23:22Z)
• Social Diversity Reduces the Complexity and Cost of Fostering Fairness [63.70639083665108]
  We investigate the effects of interference mechanisms which assume incomplete information and flexible standards of fairness. We quantify the role of diversity and show how it reduces the need for information gathering. Our results indicate that diversity changes and opens up novel mechanisms available to institutions wishing to promote fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T21:58:35Z)
• Investigating Participation Mechanisms in EU Code Week [68.8204255655161]
  Digital competence (DC) is a broad set of skills, attitudes, and knowledge for confident, critical and use of digital technologies. The aim of the manuscript is to offer a detailed and comprehensive statistical description of Code Week's participation in the EU Member States.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-29T19:16:03Z)
• Opinion dynamics in social networks: From models to data [0.0]
  Opinions shape collective action, playing a role in democratic processes, the evolution of norms, and cultural change. For decades, researchers in the social and natural sciences have tried to describe how shifting individual perspectives and social exchange lead to archetypal states of public opinion like consensus and polarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-04T19:21:26Z)
• Impact of different belief facets on agents' decision -- a refined cognitive architecture to model the interaction between organisations' institutional characteristics and agents' behaviour [0.8563354084119061]
  We investigate the impact of personality and the way that an agent weights its internal beliefs and social sanctions on an agent's actions. The study also uses the concept of cognitive dissonance associated with the fairness of institutions to investigate the agents' behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-24T17:06:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.