The Role of Legal Frameworks in Shaping Ethical Artificial Intelligence Use in Corporate Governance
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14540v1
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:21:58 GMT
- Title: The Role of Legal Frameworks in Shaping Ethical Artificial Intelligence Use in Corporate Governance
- Authors: Shahmar Mirishli,
- Abstract summary: This article examines the evolving role of legal frameworks in shaping ethical artificial intelligence (AI) use in corporate governance.<n>It explores key legal and regulatory approaches aimed at promoting transparency, accountability, and fairness in corporate AI applications.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This article examines the evolving role of legal frameworks in shaping ethical artificial intelligence (AI) use in corporate governance. As AI systems become increasingly prevalent in business operations and decision-making, there is a growing need for robust governance structures to ensure their responsible development and deployment. Through analysis of recent legislative initiatives, industry standards, and scholarly perspectives, this paper explores key legal and regulatory approaches aimed at promoting transparency, accountability, and fairness in corporate AI applications. It evaluates the strengths and limitations of current frameworks, identifies emerging best practices, and offers recommendations for developing more comprehensive and effective AI governance regimes. The findings highlight the importance of adaptable, principle-based regulations coupled with sector-specific guidance to address the unique challenges posed by AI technologies in the corporate sphere.
Related papers
- Exploring AI-powered Digital Innovations from A Transnational Governance Perspective: Implications for Market Acceptance and Digital Accountability Accountability [0.0]
This study explores the application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to AI-powered digital innovations within a transnational governance framework.
By integrating Latourian actor-network theory (ANT), this study examines how institutional motivations, regulatory compliance, and ethical and cultural acceptance drive organisations to develop and adopt AI innovations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-28T19:31:01Z) - Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z) - AI and the Transformation of Accountability and Discretion in Urban Governance [1.9152655229960793]
The paper highlights AI's potential to reposition human discretion and reshape specific types of accountability.<n>It advances a framework for responsible AI adoption, ensuring that urban governance remains adaptive, transparent, and aligned with public values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T18:11:39Z) - Decentralized Governance of Autonomous AI Agents [0.0]
ETHOS is a decentralized governance (DeGov) model leveraging Web3 technologies, including blockchain, smart contracts, and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs)<n>It establishes a global registry for AI agents, enabling dynamic risk classification, proportional oversight, and automated compliance monitoring.<n>By integrating philosophical principles of rationality, ethical grounding, and goal alignment, ETHOS aims to create a robust research agenda for promoting trust, transparency, and participatory governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-22T18:01:49Z) - From Principles to Practice: A Deep Dive into AI Ethics and Regulations [13.753819576072127]
The article thoroughly analyzes the ground-breaking AI regulatory framework proposed by the European Union.<n>Considering the technical efforts and strategies undertaken by academics and industry to uphold these principles, we explore the synergies and conflicts among the five ethical principles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-06T00:46:20Z) - The Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) in the AI Act: Roots, legal obligations and key elements for a model template [55.2480439325792]
Article aims to fill existing gaps in the theoretical and methodological elaboration of the Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA)<n>This article outlines the main building blocks of a model template for the FRIA.<n>It can serve as a blueprint for other national and international regulatory initiatives to ensure that AI is fully consistent with human rights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-07T11:55:55Z) - Open Problems in Technical AI Governance [93.89102632003996]
Technical AI governance refers to technical analysis and tools for supporting the effective governance of AI.
This paper is intended as a resource for technical researchers or research funders looking to contribute to AI governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-20T21:13:56Z) - Challenges and Best Practices in Corporate AI Governance:Lessons from the Biopharmaceutical Industry [0.0]
We discuss challenges that any organization attempting to operationalize AI governance will have to face.
These include questions concerning how to define the material scope of AI governance.
We hope to provide project managers, AI practitioners, and data privacy officers responsible for designing and implementing AI governance frameworks with general best practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-07T12:01:42Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable
Claims [59.64274607533249]
AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable.
This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems.
We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.