Homogeneous Algorithms Can Reduce Competition in Personalized Pricing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15634v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 18:43:36 GMT
• Title: Homogeneous Algorithms Can Reduce Competition in Personalized Pricing
• Authors: Nathanael Jo, Kathleen Creel, Ashia Wilson, Manish Raghavan,
• Abstract summary: We study the impact of correlated algorithms on competition in the context of personalized pricing.<n>Our results underscore the ease with which algorithms facilitate price correlation without overt communication.<n>We analyze the implications of our results on the application and interpretation of US antitrust law.
• Score: 2.6153256849514994
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Firms' algorithm development practices are often homogeneous. Whether firms train algorithms on similar data, aim at similar benchmarks, or rely on similar pre-trained models, the result is correlated predictions. We model the impact of correlated algorithms on competition in the context of personalized pricing. Our analysis reveals that (1) higher correlation diminishes consumer welfare and (2) as consumers become more price sensitive, firms are increasingly incentivized to compromise on the accuracy of their predictions in exchange for coordination. We demonstrate our theoretical results in a stylized empirical study where two firms compete using personalized pricing algorithms. Our results underscore the ease with which algorithms facilitate price correlation without overt communication, which raises concerns about a new frontier of anti-competitive behavior. We analyze the implications of our results on the application and interpretation of US antitrust law.

Related papers

• Impact of Price Inflation on Algorithmic Collusion Through Reinforcement Learning Agents [2.3335538710129193]
  This study examines the role of inflation in influencing algorithmic collusion within competitive markets. By incorporating inflation shocks into a RL-based pricing model, we analyze whether agents adapt their strategies to sustain supra-competitive profits. Results suggest that inflation amplifies non-competitive dynamics in algorithmic pricing, emphasizing the need for regulatory oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T01:00:03Z)
• Achieving Fairness in Predictive Process Analytics via Adversarial Learning [50.31323204077591]
  This paper addresses the challenge of integrating a debiasing phase into predictive business process analytics. Our framework leverages on adversial debiasing is evaluated on four case studies, showing a significant reduction in the contribution of biased variables to the predicted value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T15:56:03Z)
• Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimization [75.1240295759264]
  We propose an effective framework for Bridging and Modeling Correlations in pairwise data, named BMC.<n>We increase the consistency and informativeness of the pairwise preference signals through targeted modifications.<n>We identify that DPO alone is insufficient to model these correlations and capture nuanced variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T11:29:47Z)
• Overcoming Brittleness in Pareto-Optimal Learning-Augmented Algorithms [6.131022957085439]
  We propose a new framework in which the smoothness in the performance of the algorithm is enforced by means of a user-specified profile. We apply this new approach to a well-studied online problem, namely the one-way trading problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T23:15:21Z)
• Are we making progress in unlearning? Findings from the first NeurIPS unlearning competition [70.60872754129832]
  First NeurIPS competition on unlearning sought to stimulate the development of novel algorithms. Nearly 1,200 teams from across the world participated. We analyze top solutions and delve into discussions on benchmarking unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T12:58:00Z)
• By Fair Means or Foul: Quantifying Collusion in a Market Simulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning [1.5249435285717095]
  This research employs an experimental oligopoly model of repeated price competition. We investigate the strategies and emerging pricing patterns developed by the agents, which may lead to a collusive outcome. Our findings indicate that RL-based AI agents converge to a collusive state characterized by the charging of supracompetitive prices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T15:35:08Z)
• Rethinking Algorithmic Fairness for Human-AI Collaboration [29.334511328067777]
  Existing approaches to algorithmic fairness aim to ensure equitable outcomes if human decision-makers comply perfectly with algorithms.<n>We show that it may be infeasible to design algorithmic recommendations that are simultaneously fair in isolation, compliance-robustly fair, and more accurate than the human policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T16:21:42Z)
• Decentralized, Communication- and Coordination-free Learning in Structured Matching Markets [2.9833943723592764]
  We study the problem of online learning in competitive settings in the context of two-sided matching markets. We propose a class of decentralized, communication- and coordination-free algorithms that agents can use to reach to their stable match.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T04:08:04Z)
• DRFLM: Distributionally Robust Federated Learning with Inter-client Noise via Local Mixup [58.894901088797376]
  federated learning has emerged as a promising approach for training a global model using data from multiple organizations without leaking their raw data. We propose a general framework to solve the above two challenges simultaneously. We provide comprehensive theoretical analysis including robustness analysis, convergence analysis, and generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-16T08:08:29Z)
• Learning Predictions for Algorithms with Predictions [49.341241064279714]
  We introduce a general design approach for algorithms that learn predictors. We apply techniques from online learning to learn against adversarial instances, tune robustness-consistency trade-offs, and obtain new statistical guarantees. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach at deriving learning algorithms by analyzing methods for bipartite matching, page migration, ski-rental, and job scheduling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T17:25:43Z)
• Artificial Intelligence and Spontaneous Collusion [0.0]
  We develop a tractable model for studying strategic interactions between learning algorithms. We uncover a mechanism responsible for the emergence of algorithmic collusion. We show that spontaneous coupling can sustain collusion in prices and market shares.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-12T00:50:15Z)
• Optimal Robustness-Consistency Trade-offs for Learning-Augmented Online Algorithms [85.97516436641533]
  We study the problem of improving the performance of online algorithms by incorporating machine-learned predictions. The goal is to design algorithms that are both consistent and robust. We provide the first set of non-trivial lower bounds for competitive analysis using machine-learned predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T04:51:01Z)
• Fair Correlation Clustering [92.15492066925977]
  We obtain approximation algorithms for correlation clustering under several important types of fairness constraints. We show that fair solutions to correlation clustering can be obtained with limited increase in cost compared to the state-of-the-art (unfair) algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-06T14:28:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.