Impact of Price Inflation on Algorithmic Collusion Through Reinforcement Learning Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05335v1
• Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 01:00:03 GMT
• Title: Impact of Price Inflation on Algorithmic Collusion Through Reinforcement Learning Agents
• Authors: Sebastián Tinoco, Andrés Abeliuk, Javier Ruiz del Solar,
• Abstract summary: This study examines the role of inflation in influencing algorithmic collusion within competitive markets.<n>By incorporating inflation shocks into a RL-based pricing model, we analyze whether agents adapt their strategies to sustain supra-competitive profits.<n>Results suggest that inflation amplifies non-competitive dynamics in algorithmic pricing, emphasizing the need for regulatory oversight.
• Score: 2.3335538710129193
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Algorithmic pricing is increasingly shaping market competition, raising concerns about its potential to compromise competitive dynamics. While prior work has shown that reinforcement learning (RL)-based pricing algorithms can lead to tacit collusion, less attention has been given to the role of macroeconomic factors in shaping these dynamics. This study examines the role of inflation in influencing algorithmic collusion within competitive markets. By incorporating inflation shocks into a RL-based pricing model, we analyze whether agents adapt their strategies to sustain supra-competitive profits. Our findings indicate that inflation reduces market competitiveness by fostering implicit coordination among agents, even without direct collusion. However, despite achieving sustained higher profitability, agents fail to develop robust punishment mechanisms to deter deviations from equilibrium strategies. The results suggest that inflation amplifies non-competitive dynamics in algorithmic pricing, emphasizing the need for regulatory oversight in markets where AI-driven pricing is prevalent.

Related papers

• Homogeneous Algorithms Can Reduce Competition in Personalized Pricing [2.6153256849514994]
  We study the impact of correlated algorithms on competition in the context of personalized pricing.<n>Our results underscore the ease with which algorithms facilitate price correlation without overt communication.<n>We analyze the implications of our results on the application and interpretation of US antitrust law.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T18:43:36Z)
• Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Price Collusion in Two-sided Markets [9.053163124987535]
  We examine how AI agents using Q-learning engage in tacit collusion in two-sided markets. Our experiments reveal that AI-driven platforms achieve higher collusion levels compared to Bertrand competition. Increased network externalities significantly enhance collusion, suggesting AI algorithms exploit them to maximize profits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T17:57:56Z)
• By Fair Means or Foul: Quantifying Collusion in a Market Simulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning [1.5249435285717095]
  This research employs an experimental oligopoly model of repeated price competition. We investigate the strategies and emerging pricing patterns developed by the agents, which may lead to a collusive outcome. Our findings indicate that RL-based AI agents converge to a collusive state characterized by the charging of supracompetitive prices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T15:35:08Z)
• Designing an attack-defense game: how to increase robustness of financial transaction models via a competition [69.08339915577206]
  Given the escalating risks of malicious attacks in the finance sector, understanding adversarial strategies and robust defense mechanisms for machine learning models is critical. We aim to investigate the current state and dynamics of adversarial attacks and defenses for neural network models that use sequential financial data as the input. We have designed a competition that allows realistic and detailed investigation of problems in modern financial transaction data. The participants compete directly against each other, so possible attacks and defenses are examined in close-to-real-life conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T12:53:09Z)
• Decentralized Adversarial Training over Graphs [44.03711922549992]
  The vulnerability of machine learning models to adversarial attacks has been attracting attention in recent years.<n>We develop a decentralized adversarial framework for multiagent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T15:05:16Z)
• Towards Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning driven Over-The-Counter Market Simulations [16.48389671789281]
  We study a game between liquidity provider and liquidity taker agents interacting in an over-the-counter market. By playing against each other, our deep-reinforcement-learning-driven agents learn emergent behaviors. We show convergence rates for our multi-agent policy gradient algorithm under a transitivity assumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T17:06:08Z)
• Learning Dynamic Mechanisms in Unknown Environments: A Reinforcement Learning Approach [123.55983746427572]
  We propose novel learning algorithms to recover the dynamic Vickrey-Clarke-Grove (VCG) mechanism over multiple rounds of interaction.<n>A key contribution of our approach is incorporating reward-free online Reinforcement Learning (RL) to aid exploration over a rich policy space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T16:17:23Z)
• Finding General Equilibria in Many-Agent Economic Simulations Using Deep Reinforcement Learning [72.23843557783533]
  We show that deep reinforcement learning can discover stable solutions that are epsilon-Nash equilibria for a meta-game over agent types. Our approach is more flexible and does not need unrealistic assumptions, e.g., market clearing. We demonstrate our approach in real-business-cycle models, a representative family of DGE models, with 100 worker-consumers, 10 firms, and a government who taxes and redistributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-03T17:00:17Z)
• Distributed Adaptive Learning Under Communication Constraints [54.22472738551687]
  This work examines adaptive distributed learning strategies designed to operate under communication constraints. We consider a network of agents that must solve an online optimization problem from continual observation of streaming data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-03T19:23:48Z)
• False Correlation Reduction for Offline Reinforcement Learning [115.11954432080749]
  We propose falSe COrrelation REduction (SCORE) for offline RL, a practically effective and theoretically provable algorithm. We empirically show that SCORE achieves the SoTA performance with 3.1x acceleration on various tasks in a standard benchmark (D4RL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T15:34:03Z)
• Inducing Equilibria via Incentives: Simultaneous Design-and-Play Finds Global Optima [114.31577038081026]
  We propose an efficient method that tackles the designer's and agents' problems simultaneously in a single loop. Although the designer does not solve the equilibrium problem repeatedly, it can anticipate the overall influence of the incentives on the agents. We prove that the algorithm converges to the global optima at a sublinear rate for a broad class of games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T06:53:59Z)
• Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching Markets: Uncertain Preferences and Strategic Behaviors [91.3755431537592]
  This article develops a framework for learning optimal strategies in real-world matching markets. We show that there exists a welfare-versus-fairness trade-off that is characterized by the uncertainty level of acceptance. We prove that participants can be better off with multi-stage matching compared to single-stage matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-13T19:25:52Z)
• Empirical Study of Market Impact Conditional on Order-Flow Imbalance [0.0]
  We show that for small signed order-flows, the price impact grows linearly with increase in the order-flow imbalance. We have, further, implemented a machine learning algorithm to forecast market impact given a signed order-flow. Our findings suggest that machine learning models can be used in estimation of financial variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-17T14:58:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.