Learn to Bid as a Price-Maker Wind Power Producer
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16107v1
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 12:51:37 GMT
- Title: Learn to Bid as a Price-Maker Wind Power Producer
- Authors: Shobhit Singhal, Marta Fochesato, Liviu Aolaritei, Florian Dörfler,
- Abstract summary: Wind power producers (WPPs) participating in short-term power markets face significant imbalance costs due to their non-dispatchable and variable production.<n>We propose an online learning algorithm that leverages contextual information to optimize WPP bids in the price-maker setting.<n>The algorithm's performance is evaluated against various benchmark strategies using a numerical simulation of the German day-ahead and real-time markets.
- Score: 2.249916681499244
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Wind power producers (WPPs) participating in short-term power markets face significant imbalance costs due to their non-dispatchable and variable production. While some WPPs have a large enough market share to influence prices with their bidding decisions, existing optimal bidding methods rarely account for this aspect. Price-maker approaches typically model bidding as a bilevel optimization problem, but these methods require complex market models, estimating other participants' actions, and are computationally demanding. To address these challenges, we propose an online learning algorithm that leverages contextual information to optimize WPP bids in the price-maker setting. We formulate the strategic bidding problem as a contextual multi-armed bandit, ensuring provable regret minimization. The algorithm's performance is evaluated against various benchmark strategies using a numerical simulation of the German day-ahead and real-time markets.
Related papers
- FinTSB: A Comprehensive and Practical Benchmark for Financial Time Series Forecasting [58.70072722290475]
Financial time series (FinTS) record the behavior of human-brain-augmented decision-making.
FinTSB is a comprehensive and practical benchmark for financial time series forecasting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-26T05:19:16Z) - A Primal-Dual Online Learning Approach for Dynamic Pricing of Sequentially Displayed Complementary Items under Sale Constraints [54.46126953873298]
We address the problem of dynamically pricing complementary items that are sequentially displayed to customers.
Coherent pricing policies for complementary items are essential because optimizing the pricing of each item individually is ineffective.
We empirically evaluate our approach using synthetic settings randomly generated from real-world data, and compare its performance in terms of constraints violation and regret.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-08T09:55:31Z) - Benchmarking PtO and PnO Methods in the Predictive Combinatorial Optimization Regime [59.27851754647913]
Predictive optimization is the precise modeling of many real-world applications, including energy cost-aware scheduling and budget allocation on advertising.
We develop a modular framework to benchmark 11 existing PtO/PnO methods on 8 problems, including a new industrial dataset for advertising.
Our study shows that PnO approaches are better than PtO on 7 out of 8 benchmarks, but there is no silver bullet found for the specific design choices of PnO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T13:19:34Z) - Insurance pricing on price comparison websites via reinforcement
learning [7.023335262537794]
This paper introduces reinforcement learning framework that learns optimal pricing policy by integrating model-based and model-free methods.
The paper also highlights the importance of evaluating pricing policies using an offline dataset in a consistent fashion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-14T04:44:56Z) - Non-Stationary Dynamic Pricing Via Actor-Critic Information-Directed
Pricing [1.4180331276028662]
The proposed ACIDP extends information-directed sampling (IDS) algorithms from statistical machine learning to include microeconomic choice theory.
It outperforms competing bandit algorithms including Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) and Thompson sampling (TS) in a series of market environment shifts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-19T14:37:37Z) - Data-Driven Online Interactive Bidding Strategy for Demand Response [0.30586855806896046]
Demand response (DR) provides the services of peak shaving, enhancing the efficiency of renewable energy utilization with a short response period, and low cost.
Various categories of DR are established, e.g. automated DR, incentive DR, emergency DR, and demand bidding.
This paper determines the bidding and purchasing strategy simultaneously employing the smart meter data and functions.
The results prove that when facing diverse situations the proposed model can earn the optimal profit via off/online learning the bidding rules and robustly making the proper bid.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-09T02:44:20Z) - Machine Learning-Driven Virtual Bidding with Electricity Market
Efficiency Analysis [7.014324899009043]
This paper develops a machine learning-driven portfolio optimization framework for virtual bidding in electricity markets.
We leverage the proposed algorithmic virtual bid trading strategy to evaluate both the profitability of the virtual bid portfolio and the efficiency of U.S. wholesale electricity markets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-06T19:30:39Z) - An Artificial Intelligence Framework for Bidding Optimization with
Uncertainty inMultiple Frequency Reserve Markets [0.32622301272834525]
Frequency reserves are resources that adjust power production or consumption in real time to react to a power grid frequency deviation.
We propose three bidding strategies to capitalise on price peaks in multi-stage markets.
We also propose an AI-based bidding optimization framework that implements these three strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-05T12:04:29Z) - Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching Markets: Uncertain Preferences and
Strategic Behaviors [91.3755431537592]
This article develops a framework for learning optimal strategies in real-world matching markets.
We show that there exists a welfare-versus-fairness trade-off that is characterized by the uncertainty level of acceptance.
We prove that participants can be better off with multi-stage matching compared to single-stage matching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-13T19:25:52Z) - Universal Trading for Order Execution with Oracle Policy Distillation [99.57416828489568]
We propose a novel universal trading policy optimization framework to bridge the gap between the noisy yet imperfect market states and the optimal action sequences for order execution.
We show that our framework can better guide the learning of the common policy towards practically optimal execution by an oracle teacher with perfect information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-28T05:52:18Z) - Cost-Efficient Online Hyperparameter Optimization [94.60924644778558]
We propose an online HPO algorithm that reaches human expert-level performance within a single run of the experiment.
Our proposed online HPO algorithm reaches human expert-level performance within a single run of the experiment, while incurring only modest computational overhead compared to regular training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-17T04:55:30Z) - A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Continuous Intraday Market
Bidding [69.37299910149981]
A key component for the successful renewable energy sources integration is the usage of energy storage.
We propose a novel modelling framework for the strategic participation of energy storage in the European continuous intraday market.
An distributed version of the fitted Q algorithm is chosen for solving this problem due to its sample efficiency.
Results indicate that the agent converges to a policy that achieves in average higher total revenues than the benchmark strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-13T13:50:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.