Scalable Evaluation of Online Facilitation Strategies via Synthetic Simulation of Discussions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16505v2
• Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 11:49:17 GMT
• Title: Scalable Evaluation of Online Facilitation Strategies via Synthetic Simulation of Discussions
• Authors: Dimitris Tsirmpas, Ion Androutsopoulos, John Pavlopoulos,
• Abstract summary: We propose a simple, generalizable, LLM-driven methodology to prototype the development of LLM facilitators.<n>We use our methodology to test whether current facilitation strategies can improve the performance of LLM facilitators.
• Score: 13.85030571429358
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Limited large-scale evaluations exist for facilitation strategies of online discussions due to significant costs associated with human involvement. An effective solution is synthetic discussion simulations using Large Language Models (LLMs) to create initial pilot experiments. We propose a simple, generalizable, LLM-driven methodology to prototype the development of LLM facilitators, and produce high-quality synthetic data without human involvement. We use our methodology to test whether current facilitation strategies can improve the performance of LLM facilitators. We find that, while LLM facilitators significantly improve synthetic discussions, there is no evidence that the application of more elaborate facilitation strategies proposed in modern Social Science research lead to further improvements in discussion quality, compared to more basic approaches. Additionally, we find that small LLMs (such as Mistral Nemo 12B) can perform comparably to larger models (such as LLaMa 70B), and that special instructions must be used for instruction-tuned models to induce toxicity in synthetic discussions. We confirm that each component of our methodology contributes substantially to high quality data via an ablation study. We release an open-source framework, "SynDisco" (pip install syndisco), which implements our methodology. We also release the "Virtual Moderation Dataset" (https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/vmd), a large, publicly available dataset containing LLM-generated and LLM-annotated discussions using multiple open-source LLMs.

Related papers

• What LLMs Miss in Recommendations: Bridging the Gap with Retrieval-Augmented Collaborative Signals [4.297070083645049]
  User-item interactions contain rich collaborative signals that form the backbone of many successful recommender systems.<n>It remains unclear whether large language models (LLMs) can effectively reason over this type of collaborative information.<n>We introduce a simple retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) method that enhances LLMs by grounding their predictions in structured interaction data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T05:18:57Z)
• From Reviews to Dialogues: Active Synthesis for Zero-Shot LLM-based Conversational Recommender System [49.57258257916805]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong zero-shot recommendation capabilities.<n>Practical applications often favor smaller, internally managed recommender models due to scalability, interpretability, and data privacy constraints.<n>We propose an active data augmentation framework that synthesizes conversational training data by leveraging black-box LLMs guided by active learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T23:05:47Z)
• A Strategic Coordination Framework of Small LLMs Matches Large LLMs in Data Synthesis [43.746749403268275]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from high computational costs, environmental inefficiency, and potential biases inherited from monolithic architectures.<n>We propose a collaborative framework, GRA, that aggregates specialized roles across small LLMs to generate high-quality, diverse, and reliable data.<n>Our results challenge the necessity of monolithic large models for high-quality data synthesis, advocating instead for strategic coordination of smaller agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T06:13:43Z)
• LLM Social Simulations Are a Promising Research Method [4.6456873975541635]
  We argue that the promise of LLM social simulations can be achieved by addressing five tractable challenges.<n>We believe that LLM social simulations can already be used for pilot and exploratory studies.<n>Researchers should prioritize developing conceptual models and iterative evaluations to make the best use of new AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T03:01:26Z)
• Do We Truly Need So Many Samples? Multi-LLM Repeated Sampling Efficiently Scales Test-Time Compute [55.330813919992465]
  This paper presents a simple, effective, and cost-efficient strategy to improve LLM performance by scaling test-time compute. Our strategy builds upon the repeated-sampling-then-voting framework, with a novel twist: incorporating multiple models, even weaker ones, to leverage their complementary strengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:13:43Z)
• Option Discovery Using LLM-guided Semantic Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning [16.654435148168172]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable promise in reasoning and decision-making.<n>We propose an LLM-guided hierarchical RL framework, termed LDSC, to enhance sample efficiency, generalization, and multi-task adaptability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T15:49:56Z)
• From Human Annotation to LLMs: SILICON Annotation Workflow for Management Research [13.818244562506138]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) provide a cost-effective and efficient alternative to human annotation. This paper introduces the SILICON" (Systematic Inference with LLMs for Information Classification and Notation) workflow. The workflow integrates established principles of human annotation with systematic prompt optimization and model selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T02:21:41Z)
• EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For In-Context Exploration [76.66831821738927]
  Large language models (LLMs) remain under-studied in scenarios requiring optimal decision-making under uncertainty.<n>We measure LLMs' (in)ability to make optimal decisions in bandits, a state-less reinforcement learning setting relevant to many applications.<n>Motivated by the existence of optimal exploration algorithms, we propose efficient ways to integrate this algorithmic knowledge into LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:54:03Z)
• Social Debiasing for Fair Multi-modal LLMs [55.8071045346024]
  Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have advanced significantly, offering powerful vision-language understanding capabilities. However, these models often inherit severe social biases from their training datasets, leading to unfair predictions based on attributes like race and gender. This paper addresses the issue of social biases in MLLMs by i) Introducing a comprehensive Counterfactual dataset with Multiple Social Concepts (CMSC) and ii) Proposing an Anti-Stereotype Debiasing strategy (ASD)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T02:08:32Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Multi-role Debates as Feedback for Bias Mitigation in LLMs [6.090496490133132]
  We propose Reinforcement Learning from Multi-role Debates as Feedback (RLDF), a novel approach for bias mitigation replacing human feedback in traditional RLHF. We utilize LLMs in multi-role debates to create a dataset that includes both high-bias and low-bias instances for training the reward model in reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T22:18:50Z)
• Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models with Self-Synthesized Rehearsal [49.24054920683246]
  Large language models (LLMs) suffer from catastrophic forgetting during continual learning. We propose a framework called Self-Synthesized Rehearsal (SSR) that uses the LLM to generate synthetic instances for rehearsal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-02T16:11:23Z)
• Characterizing Truthfulness in Large Language Model Generations with Local Intrinsic Dimension [63.330262740414646]
  We study how to characterize and predict the truthfulness of texts generated from large language models (LLMs) We suggest investigating internal activations and quantifying LLM's truthfulness using the local intrinsic dimension (LID) of model activations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T04:56:21Z)
• How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback. Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities. We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z)
• Parrot: Enhancing Multi-Turn Instruction Following for Large Language Models [79.32652077838046]
  We introduce Parrot, a solution aiming to enhance multi-turn instruction following for large language models (LLMs) First, we introduce an efficient but effective method for collecting multi-turn instructions that feature human-like queries, such as anaphora and ellipsis. Second, we propose a context-aware preference optimization strategy to further enhance LLMs for complex queries in multi-turn interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T08:36:43Z)
• Unlocking the Potential of User Feedback: Leveraging Large Language Model as User Simulator to Enhance Dialogue System [65.93577256431125]
  We propose an alternative approach called User-Guided Response Optimization (UGRO) to combine it with a smaller task-oriented dialogue model. This approach uses LLM as annotation-free user simulator to assess dialogue responses, combining them with smaller fine-tuned end-to-end TOD models. Our approach outperforms previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T13:04:56Z)
• Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate [85.3444184685235]
  We propose a Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) framework, in which multiple agents express their arguments in the state of "tit for tat" and a judge manages the debate process to obtain a final solution. Our framework encourages divergent thinking in LLMs which would be helpful for tasks that require deep levels of contemplation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T15:25:45Z)
• On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References [101.79795027550959]
  Large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators over the original reference summaries in commonly used summarization datasets. We study an LLM-as-reference learning setting for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:56:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.