On the (im)possibility of sustainable artificial intelligence. Why it does not make sense to move faster when heading the wrong way

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17702v1
• Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 09:01:15 GMT
• Title: On the (im)possibility of sustainable artificial intelligence. Why it does not make sense to move faster when heading the wrong way
• Authors: Rainer Rehak,
• Abstract summary: This article draws from insights by critical data and algorithm studies, STS, transformative sustainability science, critical computer science, and public interest theory.<n>I argue that while there are indeed many sustainability-related use cases for AI, they are likely to have more overall drawbacks than benefits.<n>In all materialities, effects are especially devastating for the global south while benefiting the global north.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently considered a sustainability "game-changer" within and outside of academia. In order to discuss sustainable AI this article draws from insights by critical data and algorithm studies, STS, transformative sustainability science, critical computer science, and public interest theory. I argue that while there are indeed many sustainability-related use cases for AI, they are likely to have more overall drawbacks than benefits. To substantiate this claim, I differentiate three 'AI materialities' of the AI supply chain: first the literal materiality (e.g. water, cobalt, lithium, energy consumption etc.), second, the informational materiality (e.g. lots of data and centralised control necessary), and third, the social materiality (e.g. exploitative data work, communities harm by waste and pollution). In all materialities, effects are especially devastating for the global south while benefiting the global north. A second strong claim regarding sustainable AI circles around so called apolitical optimisation (e.g. regarding city traffic), however the optimisation criteria (e.g. cars, bikes, emissions, commute time, health) are purely political and have to be collectively negotiated before applying AI optimisation. Hence, sustainable AI, in principle, cannot break the glass ceiling of transformation and might even distract from necessary societal change. To address that I propose to stop 'unformation gathering' and to apply the 'small is beautiful' principle. This aims to contribute to an informed academic and collective negotiation on how to (not) integrate AI into the sustainability project while avoiding to reproduce the status quo by serving hegemonic interests between useful AI use cases, techno-utopian salvation narratives, technology-centred efficiency paradigms, the exploitative and extractivist character of AI and concepts of digital degrowth.

Related papers

• Climate And Resource Awareness is Imperative to Achieving Sustainable AI (and Preventing a Global AI Arms Race) [6.570828098873743]
  We argue that reconciling climate and resource awareness is essential to realizing the full potential of sustainable AI.<n>We introduce the Climate and Resource Aware Machine Learning (CARAML) framework to address this conflict.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T11:54:10Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences.<n>First, it is not sustainable, as, despite efficiency improvements, its compute demands increase faster than model performance.<n>Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for Real Sustainability? -- What is Artificial Intelligence and Can it Help with the Sustainability Transformation? [0.0]
  This article briefly explains, classifies, and theorises AI technology. It then politically contextualises that analysis in light of the sustainability discourse. It argues that AI can play a small role in moving towards sustainable societies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T15:40:00Z)
• ChatGPT, Large Language Technologies, and the Bumpy Road of Benefiting Humanity [2.28438857884398]
  The promise that AI technologies will benefit all of humanity is empty so long as we lack a nuanced understanding of what humanity is supposed to be in the face of widening global inequality and pressing existential threats. We also need to develop standards in a sustainable and equitable way that differentiate between merely speculative and well-researched questions. Failure to do so could result in a future in which our AI technological advancements outstrip our ability to navigate their ethical and social implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T22:53:45Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• The Need for Ethical, Responsible, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence for Environmental Sciences [0.04588028371034406]
  It is imperative that we initiate a discussion about the ethical and responsible use of AI. A common misconception is that the environmental sciences are immune to such unintended consequences when AI is being used. We focus on weather and climate examples but the conclusions apply broadly across the environmental sciences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T19:57:38Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• AI Ethics Needs Good Data [0.8701566919381224]
  We argue that discourse on AI must transcend the language of 'ethics' and engage with power and political economy. We offer four 'economys' on which Good Data AI can be built: community, rights, usability and politics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-15T04:16:27Z)
• Empowering Things with Intelligence: A Survey of the Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence of Things [98.10037444792444]
  We show how AI can empower the IoT to make it faster, smarter, greener, and safer. First, we present progress in AI research for IoT from four perspectives: perceiving, learning, reasoning, and behaving. Finally, we summarize some promising applications of AIoT that are likely to profoundly reshape our world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-17T13:14:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.