The Human-Machine Identity Blur: A Unified Framework for Cybersecurity Risk Management in 2025

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18255v1
• Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:37:14 GMT
• Title: The Human-Machine Identity Blur: A Unified Framework for Cybersecurity Risk Management in 2025
• Authors: Kush Janani,
• Abstract summary: The modern enterprise is facing an unprecedented surge in digital identities.<n>Human and machine identities intersect, delegate authority, and create new attack surfaces.<n>We propose a Unified Identity Governance Framework based on four core principles.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The modern enterprise is facing an unprecedented surge in digital identities, with machine identities now significantly outnumbering human identities. This paper examines the cybersecurity risks emerging from what we define as the "human-machine identity blur" - the point at which human and machine identities intersect, delegate authority, and create new attack surfaces. Drawing from industry data, expert insights, and real-world incident analysis, we identify key governance gaps in current identity management models that treat human and machine entities as separate domains. To address these challenges, we propose a Unified Identity Governance Framework based on four core principles: treating identity as a continuum rather than a binary distinction, applying consistent risk evaluation across all identity types, implementing continuous verification guided by zero trust principles, and maintaining governance throughout the entire identity lifecycle. Our research shows that organizations adopting this unified approach experience a 47 percent reduction in identity-related security incidents and a 62 percent improvement in incident response time. We conclude by offering a practical implementation roadmap and outlining future research directions as AI-driven systems become increasingly autonomous.

Related papers

• Towards Trustworthy GUI Agents: A Survey [64.6445117343499]
  This survey examines the trustworthiness of GUI agents in five critical dimensions. We identify major challenges such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks, cascading failure modes in sequential decision-making. As GUI agents become more widespread, establishing robust safety standards and responsible development practices is essential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T13:26:00Z)
• AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons [62.374792825813394]
  This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehensive industry-standard benchmark for assessing AI-product risk and reliability. The benchmark evaluates an AI system's resistance to prompts designed to elicit dangerous, illegal, or undesirable behavior in 12 hazard categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T05:58:52Z)
• ID$^3$: Identity-Preserving-yet-Diversified Diffusion Models for Synthetic Face Recognition [60.15830516741776]
  Synthetic face recognition (SFR) aims to generate datasets that mimic the distribution of real face data. We introduce a diffusion-fueled SFR model termed $textID3$. $textID3$ employs an ID-preserving loss to generate diverse yet identity-consistent facial appearances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T06:46:40Z)
• Identity-driven Three-Player Generative Adversarial Network for Synthetic-based Face Recognition [14.73254194339562]
  We present a three-player generative adversarial network (GAN) framework, namely IDnet, that enables the integration of identity information into the generation process. We empirically proved that our IDnet synthetic images are of higher identity discrimination in comparison to the conventional two-player GAN. We demonstrated the applicability of our IDnet data in training face recognition models by evaluating these models on a wide set of face recognition benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-30T00:04:27Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• Subverting machines, fluctuating identities: Re-learning human categorization [1.3106063755117399]
  Default paradigm in AI research envisions identity with essential attributes that are discrete and static. In stark contrast, strands of thought within critical theory present a conception of identity as malleable and constructed entirely through interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T03:09:25Z)
• Protecting Celebrities with Identity Consistency Transformer [119.67996461810304]
  Identity Consistency Transformer focuses on high-level semantics, specifically identity information, and detecting a suspect face by finding identity inconsistency in inner and outer face regions. We show that Identity Consistency Transformer exhibits superior generalization ability not only across different datasets but also across various types of image degradation forms found in real-world applications including deepfake videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T18:59:58Z)
• Towards a trustful digital world: exploring self-sovereign identity ecosystems [4.266530973611429]
  Self-sovereign identity (SSI) solutions rely on distributed ledger technologies and verifiable credentials. This paper builds on observations gathered in a field study to identify the building blocks, antecedents and possible outcomes of SSI ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-26T08:56:22Z)
• Semantic Consistency and Identity Mapping Multi-Component Generative Adversarial Network for Person Re-Identification [39.605062525247135]
  We propose a semantic consistency and identity mapping multi-component generative adversarial network (SC-IMGAN) which provides style adaptation from one to many domains. Our proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art techniques on six challenging person Re-ID datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T14:12:29Z)
• Towards Practical Implementations of Person Re-Identification from Full Video Frames [1.3439502310822151]
  We argue that the current way of studying person re-identification, i.e. by trying to re-identify a person within already detected and pre-cropped images, is not sufficient to implement practical security applications. To support this claim, we introduce the Full Frame Person Re-ID setting (FF-PRID) and define specific metrics to evaluate FF-PRID implementations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-02T22:53:46Z)
• Intra-Camera Supervised Person Re-Identification [87.88852321309433]
  We propose a novel person re-identification paradigm based on an idea of independent per-camera identity annotation. This eliminates the most time-consuming and tedious inter-camera identity labelling process. We formulate a Multi-tAsk mulTi-labEl (MATE) deep learning method for Intra-Camera Supervised (ICS) person re-id.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-12T15:26:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.