Understanding and Characterizing Mock Assertions in Unit Tests

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19284v1
• Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 02:35:05 GMT
• Title: Understanding and Characterizing Mock Assertions in Unit Tests
• Authors: Hengcheng Zhu, Valerio Terragni, Lili Wei, Shing-Chi Cheung, Jiarong Wu, Yepang Liu,
• Abstract summary: Despite their significance, mock assertions are rarely considered by automated test generation techniques.<n>Our analysis of 4,652 test cases from 11 popular Java projects reveals that mock assertions are mostly applied to validating specific kinds of method calls.<n>We find that mock assertions complement traditional test assertions by ensuring the desired side effects have been produced.
• Score: 12.96550571237691
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Mock assertions provide developers with a powerful means to validate program behaviors that are unobservable to test assertions. Despite their significance, they are rarely considered by automated test generation techniques. Effective generation of mock assertions requires understanding how they are used in practice. Although previous studies highlighted the importance of mock assertions, none provide insight into their usages. To bridge this gap, we conducted the first empirical study on mock assertions, examining their adoption, the characteristics of the verified method invocations, and their effectiveness in fault detection. Our analysis of 4,652 test cases from 11 popular Java projects reveals that mock assertions are mostly applied to validating specific kinds of method calls, such as those interacting with external resources and those reflecting whether a certain code path was traversed in systems under test. Additionally, we find that mock assertions complement traditional test assertions by ensuring the desired side effects have been produced, validating control flow logic, and checking internal computation results. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of mock assertion usages and provide a foundation for future related research such as automated test generation that support mock assertions.

Related papers

• Studying the Impact of Early Test Termination Due to Assertion Failure on Code Coverage and Spectrum-based Fault Localization [48.22524837906857]
  This study is the first empirical study on early test termination due to assertion failure. We investigated 207 versions of 6 open-source projects. Our findings indicate that early test termination harms both code coverage and the effectiveness of spectrum-based fault localization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-06T17:14:09Z)
• Examining False Positives under Inference Scaling for Mathematical Reasoning [59.19191774050967]
  This paper systematically examines the prevalence of false positive solutions in mathematical problem solving for language models.<n>We explore how false positives influence the inference time scaling behavior of language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T07:49:35Z)
• AsserT5: Test Assertion Generation Using a Fine-Tuned Code Language Model [8.995812770349602]
  We propose AsserT5, a new model based on the pre-trained CodeT5 model.<n>We find that the abstraction and the inclusion of the focal method are useful also for a fine-tuned pre-trained model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T20:42:22Z)
• Pointwise Mutual Information as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [78.28197013467157]
  We show that the pointwise mutual information between a context and a question is an effective gauge for language model performance.<n>We propose two methods that use the pointwise mutual information between a document and a question as a gauge for selecting and constructing prompts that lead to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:14:09Z)
• On the Rationale and Use of Assertion Messages in Test Code: Insights from Software Practitioners [10.264620067797798]
  Unit testing is an important practice that helps ensure the quality of a software system by validating its behavior through a series of test cases. Core to these test cases are assertion statements, which enable software practitioners to validate the correctness of the system's behavior. To aid with understanding and troubleshooting test case failures, practitioners can include a message (i.e., assertion message) within the assertion statement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-03T11:13:36Z)
• LLM Critics Help Catch Bugs in Mathematics: Towards a Better Mathematical Verifier with Natural Language Feedback [71.95402654982095]
  We propose Math-Minos, a natural language feedback-enhanced verifier. Our experiments reveal that a small set of natural language feedback can significantly boost the performance of the verifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T06:42:27Z)
• Knowledge-Augmented Language Model Verification [68.6099592486075]
  Recent Language Models (LMs) have shown impressive capabilities in generating texts with the knowledge internalized in parameters. We propose to verify the output and the knowledge of the knowledge-augmented LMs with a separate verifier. Our results show that the proposed verifier effectively identifies retrieval and generation errors, allowing LMs to provide more factually correct outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T15:40:00Z)
• SAGA: Summarization-Guided Assert Statement Generation [34.51502565985728]
  This paper presents a novel summarization-guided approach for automatically generating assert statements. We leverage a pre-trained language model as the reference architecture and fine-tune it on the task of assert statement generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T07:03:21Z)
• Mimicking Production Behavior with Generated Mocks [11.367562045401554]
  We propose to monitor an application in production to generate tests that mimic realistic execution scenarios through mocks. The approach is automated and implemented in an open-source tool called RICK. All the generated test cases are executable, and 52.4% of them successfully mimic the complete execution context of the target methods observed in production.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-02T09:08:18Z)
• Auditing AI models for Verified Deployment under Semantic Specifications [65.12401653917838]
  AuditAI bridges the gap between interpretable formal verification and scalability. We show how AuditAI allows us to obtain controlled variations for verification and certified training while addressing the limitations of verifying using only pixel-space perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-25T22:53:24Z)
• Empowering Language Understanding with Counterfactual Reasoning [141.48592718583245]
  We propose a Counterfactual Reasoning Model, which mimics the counterfactual thinking by learning from few counterfactual samples. In particular, we devise a generation module to generate representative counterfactual samples for each factual sample, and a retrospective module to retrospect the model prediction by comparing the counterfactual and factual samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T06:36:52Z)
• Generating Accurate Assert Statements for Unit Test Cases using Pretrained Transformers [10.846226514357866]
  Unit testing represents the foundational basis of the software testing pyramid. We present an approach to support developers in writing unit test cases by generating accurate and useful assert statements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-11T19:35:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.