Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning Using Generative Adversarial Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20884v3
• Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 09:11:08 GMT
• Title: Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning Using Generative Adversarial Networks
• Authors: Usama Zafar, André M. H. Teixeira, Salman Toor,
• Abstract summary: Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients without sharing raw data, but its robustness is threatened by Byzantine behaviors such as data and model poisoning.<n>We present a defense framework that addresses these challenges by leveraging a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) at the server to synthesize representative data for validating client updates.<n>This approach eliminates reliance on external datasets, adapts to diverse attack strategies, and integrates seamlessly into standard FL.
• Score: 1.4091801425319963
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients without sharing raw data, but its robustness is threatened by Byzantine behaviors such as data and model poisoning. Existing defenses face fundamental limitations: robust aggregation rules incur error lower bounds that grow with client heterogeneity, while detection-based methods often rely on heuristics (e.g., a fixed number of malicious clients) or require trusted external datasets for validation. We present a defense framework that addresses these challenges by leveraging a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) at the server to synthesize representative data for validating client updates. This approach eliminates reliance on external datasets, adapts to diverse attack strategies, and integrates seamlessly into standard FL workflows. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that our framework accurately distinguishes malicious from benign clients while maintaining overall model accuracy. Beyond Byzantine robustness, we also examine the representativeness of synthesized data, computational costs of cGAN training, and the transparency and scalability of our approach.

Related papers

• Adaptive Dual-Weighting Framework for Federated Learning via Out-of-Distribution Detection [53.45696787935487]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across large-scale distributed service nodes.<n>In real-world service-oriented deployments, data generated by heterogeneous users, devices, and application scenarios are inherently non-IID.<n>We propose FLood, a novel FL framework inspired by out-of-distribution (OOD) detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T05:54:59Z)
• FLARE: Adaptive Multi-Dimensional Reputation for Robust Client Reliability in Federated Learning [0.6524460254566904]
  Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training while preserving data privacy.<n>It remains vulnerable to malicious clients who compromise model integrity through Byzantine attacks, data poisoning, or adaptive adversarial behaviors.<n>We propose FLARE, an adaptive reputation-based framework that transforms client reliability assessment from binary decisions to a continuous, multi-dimensional trust evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T17:57:40Z)
• Defending the Edge: Representative-Attention for Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning [7.808916974942399]
  heterogeneous edge devices produce diverse, non-independent, and identically distributed (non-IID) data.<n>We propose a novel representative-attention-based defense mechanism, named FeRA, to distinguish benign from malicious clients.<n>Our evaluation demonstrates FeRA's robustness across various FL scenarios, including challenging non-IID data distributions typical of edge devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T13:44:32Z)
• Robust Asymmetric Heterogeneous Federated Learning with Corrupted Clients [60.22876915395139]
  This paper studies a challenging robust federated learning task with model heterogeneous and data corrupted clients.<n>Data corruption is unavoidable due to factors such as random noise, compression artifacts, or environmental conditions in real-world deployment.<n>We propose a novel Robust Asymmetric Heterogeneous Federated Learning framework to address these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T09:52:04Z)
• Asynchronous Personalized Federated Learning through Global Memorization [16.630360485032163]
  Federated Learning offers a privacy preserving solution by enabling collaborative model training across decentralized devices without centralizing sensitive data.<n>We propose the Asynchronous Personalized Federated Learning framework, which empowers clients to develop personalized models using a server side semantic generator.<n>This generator, trained via data free knowledge transfer under global model supervision, enhances client data diversity by producing both seen and unseen samples.<n>To counter the risks of synthetic data impairing training, we introduce a decoupled model method, ensuring robust personalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T09:00:33Z)
• Robust Knowledge Distillation in Federated Learning: Counteracting Backdoor Attacks [12.227509826319267]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across multiple devices while preserving data privacy. It remains susceptible to backdoor attacks, where malicious participants can compromise the global model. We propose Robust Knowledge Distillation (RKD), a novel defence mechanism that enhances model integrity without relying on restrictive assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T22:57:08Z)
• Formal Logic-guided Robust Federated Learning against Poisoning Attacks [6.997975378492098]
  Federated Learning (FL) offers a promising solution to the privacy concerns associated with centralized Machine Learning (ML) FL is vulnerable to various security threats, including poisoning attacks, where adversarial clients manipulate the training data or model updates to degrade overall model performance. We present a defense mechanism designed to mitigate poisoning attacks in federated learning for time-series tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T16:23:19Z)
• FedCAP: Robust Federated Learning via Customized Aggregation and Personalization [13.17735010891312]
  Federated learning (FL) has been applied to various privacy-preserving scenarios. We propose FedCAP, a robust FL framework against both data heterogeneity and Byzantine attacks. We show that FedCAP performs well in several non-IID settings and shows strong robustness under a series of poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T23:01:22Z)
• Celtibero: Robust Layered Aggregation for Federated Learning [0.0]
  We introduce Celtibero, a novel defense mechanism that integrates layered aggregation to enhance robustness against adversarial manipulation. We demonstrate that Celtibero consistently achieves high main task accuracy (MTA) while maintaining minimal attack success rates (ASR) across a range of untargeted and targeted poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T12:54:00Z)
• Certifiably Byzantine-Robust Federated Conformal Prediction [49.23374238798428]
  We introduce a novel framework Rob-FCP, which executes robust federated conformal prediction effectively countering malicious clients. We empirically demonstrate the robustness of Rob-FCP against diverse proportions of malicious clients under a variety of Byzantine attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T04:43:30Z)
• Fed-Credit: Robust Federated Learning with Credibility Management [18.349127735378048]
  Federated Learning (FL) is an emerging machine learning approach enabling model training on decentralized devices or data sources. We propose a robust FL approach based on the credibility management scheme, called Fed-Credit. The results exhibit superior accuracy and resilience against adversarial attacks, all while maintaining comparatively low computational complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T03:35:13Z)
• An Aggregation-Free Federated Learning for Tackling Data Heterogeneity [50.44021981013037]
  Federated Learning (FL) relies on the effectiveness of utilizing knowledge from distributed datasets. Traditional FL methods adopt an aggregate-then-adapt framework, where clients update local models based on a global model aggregated by the server from the previous training round. We introduce FedAF, a novel aggregation-free FL algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T05:55:23Z)
• Precision Guided Approach to Mitigate Data Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning [4.907460152017894]
  Federated Learning (FL) is a collaborative learning paradigm enabling participants to collectively train a shared machine learning model. Current FL defense strategies against data poisoning attacks either involve a trade-off between accuracy and robustness. We present FedZZ, which harnesses a zone-based deviating update (ZBDU) mechanism to effectively counter data poisoning attacks in FL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T14:37:49Z)
• FLASH: Federated Learning Across Simultaneous Heterogeneities [55.0981921695672]
  FLASH(Federated Learning Across Simultaneous Heterogeneities) is a lightweight and flexible client selection algorithm.<n>It outperforms state-of-the-art FL frameworks under extensive sources of Heterogeneities.<n>It achieves substantial and consistent improvements over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T20:04:39Z)
• Client-side Gradient Inversion Against Federated Learning from Poisoning [59.74484221875662]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables distributed participants to train a global model without sharing data directly to a central server. Recent studies have revealed that FL is vulnerable to gradient inversion attack (GIA), which aims to reconstruct the original training samples. We propose Client-side poisoning Gradient Inversion (CGI), which is a novel attack method that can be launched from clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T03:48:27Z)
• FedDefender: Client-Side Attack-Tolerant Federated Learning [60.576073964874]
  Federated learning enables learning from decentralized data sources without compromising privacy. It is vulnerable to model poisoning attacks, where malicious clients interfere with the training process. We propose a new defense mechanism that focuses on the client-side, called FedDefender, to help benign clients train robust local models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-18T08:00:41Z)
• Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations [55.2480439325792]
  Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources. FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks. We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously. MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z)
• FedCC: Robust Federated Learning against Model Poisoning Attacks [0.0]
  Federated learning is a distributed framework designed to address privacy concerns.<n>It introduces new attack surfaces, which are especially prone when data is non-Independently and Identically Distributed.<n>We present FedCC, a simple yet effective novel defense algorithm against model poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T01:52:32Z)
• FLIP: A Provable Defense Framework for Backdoor Mitigation in Federated Learning [66.56240101249803]
  We study how hardening benign clients can affect the global model (and the malicious clients) We propose a trigger reverse engineering based defense and show that our method can achieve improvement with guarantee robustness. Our results on eight competing SOTA defense methods show the empirical superiority of our method on both single-shot and continuous FL backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T22:24:03Z)
• RoFL: Attestable Robustness for Secure Federated Learning [59.63865074749391]
  Federated Learning allows a large number of clients to train a joint model without the need to share their private data. To ensure the confidentiality of the client updates, Federated Learning systems employ secure aggregation. We present RoFL, a secure Federated Learning system that improves robustness against malicious clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T15:42:49Z)
• Federated Learning with Unreliable Clients: Performance Analysis and Mechanism Design [76.29738151117583]
  Federated Learning (FL) has become a promising tool for training effective machine learning models among distributed clients. However, low quality models could be uploaded to the aggregator server by unreliable clients, leading to a degradation or even a collapse of training. We model these unreliable behaviors of clients and propose a defensive mechanism to mitigate such a security risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T08:02:27Z)
• Auto-weighted Robust Federated Learning with Corrupted Data Sources [7.475348174281237]
  Federated learning provides a communication-efficient and privacy-preserving training process. Standard federated learning techniques that naively minimize an average loss function are vulnerable to data corruptions. We propose Auto-weighted Robust Federated Learning (arfl) to provide robustness against corrupted data sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-14T21:54:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.