Modeling Challenging Patient Interactions: LLMs for Medical Communication Training

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22250v2
• Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 17:25:48 GMT
• Title: Modeling Challenging Patient Interactions: LLMs for Medical Communication Training
• Authors: Anna Bodonhelyi, Christian Stegemann-Philipps, Alessandra Sonanini, Lea Herschbach, Márton Szép, Anne Herrmann-Werner, Teresa Festl-Wietek, Enkelejda Kasneci, Friederike Holderried,
• Abstract summary: This study proposes the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to simulate authentic patient communication styles.<n>We developed virtual patients (VPs) that embody nuanced emotional and conversational traits.<n>Medical professionals evaluated these VPs, rating their authenticity (accuser: $3.8 pm 1.0$; rationalizer: $3.7 pm 0.8$ on a 5-point Likert scale (from one to five)) and correctly identifying their styles.
• Score: 39.67477471073807
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Effective patient communication is pivotal in healthcare, yet traditional medical training often lacks exposure to diverse, challenging interpersonal dynamics. To bridge this gap, this study proposes the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to simulate authentic patient communication styles, specifically the "accuser" and "rationalizer" personas derived from the Satir model, while also ensuring multilingual applicability to accommodate diverse cultural contexts and enhance accessibility for medical professionals. Leveraging advanced prompt engineering, including behavioral prompts, author's notes, and stubbornness mechanisms, we developed virtual patients (VPs) that embody nuanced emotional and conversational traits. Medical professionals evaluated these VPs, rating their authenticity (accuser: $3.8 \pm 1.0$; rationalizer: $3.7 \pm 0.8$ on a 5-point Likert scale (from one to five)) and correctly identifying their styles. Emotion analysis revealed distinct profiles: the accuser exhibited pain, anger, and distress, while the rationalizer displayed contemplation and calmness, aligning with predefined, detailed patient description including medical history. Sentiment scores (on a scale from zero to nine) further validated these differences in the communication styles, with the accuser adopting negative ($3.1 \pm 0.6$) and the rationalizer more neutral ($4.0 \pm 0.4$) tone. These results underscore LLMs' capability to replicate complex communication styles, offering transformative potential for medical education. This approach equips trainees to navigate challenging clinical scenarios by providing realistic, adaptable patient interactions, enhancing empathy and diagnostic acumen. Our findings advocate for AI-driven tools as scalable, cost-effective solutions to cultivate nuanced communication skills, setting a foundation for future innovations in healthcare training.

Related papers

• Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions. We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning. Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z)
• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• A Comparative Study on Patient Language across Therapeutic Domains for Effective Patient Voice Classification in Online Health Discussions [0.48124799513933847]
  In this study, we analyse the importance of linguistic characteristics in accurately classifying patient voices. We fine-tuned a pre-trained Language Model on the combined datasets with similar linguistic patterns, resulting in a highly accurate automatic patient voice classification. Being the pioneering study on the topic, our focus on extracting authentic patient experiences from social media stands as a crucial step towards advancing healthcare standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:51:46Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development. We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Synthetic Patients: Simulating Difficult Conversations with Multimodal Generative AI for Medical Education [0.0]
  Effective patient-centered communication is a core competency for physicians. Both seasoned providers and medical trainees report decreased confidence in leading conversations on sensitive topics. We present a novel educational tool designed to facilitate interactive, real-time simulations of difficult conversations in a video-based format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T11:02:08Z)
• Dr-LLaVA: Visual Instruction Tuning with Symbolic Clinical Grounding [53.629132242389716]
  Vision-Language Models (VLM) can support clinicians by analyzing medical images and engaging in natural language interactions. VLMs often exhibit "hallucinogenic" behavior, generating textual outputs not grounded in contextual multimodal information. We propose a new alignment algorithm that uses symbolic representations of clinical reasoning to ground VLMs in medical knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T23:19:28Z)
• Chain-of-Interaction: Enhancing Large Language Models for Psychiatric Behavior Understanding by Dyadic Contexts [4.403408362362806]
  We introduce the Chain-of-Interaction prompting method to contextualize large language models for psychiatric decision support by the dyadic interactions. This approach enables large language models to leverage the coding scheme, patient state, and domain knowledge for patient behavioral coding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T17:47:49Z)
• Probabilistic emotion and sentiment modelling of patient-reported experiences [0.04096453902709291]
  This study introduces a novel methodology for modelling patient emotions from online patient experience narratives. We employ metadata network topic modelling to analyse patient-reported experiences from Care Opinion. We develop a probabilistic, context-specific emotion recommender system capable of predicting both multilabel emotions and binary sentiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T05:39:20Z)
• Evaluating the Efficacy of Interactive Language Therapy Based on LLM for High-Functioning Autistic Adolescent Psychological Counseling [1.1780706927049207]
  This study investigates the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) in interactive language therapy for high-functioning autistic adolescents. LLMs present a novel opportunity to augment traditional psychological counseling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T07:55:39Z)
• PsyCoT: Psychological Questionnaire as Powerful Chain-of-Thought for Personality Detection [50.66968526809069]
  We propose a novel personality detection method, called PsyCoT, which mimics the way individuals complete psychological questionnaires in a multi-turn dialogue manner. Our experiments demonstrate that PsyCoT significantly improves the performance and robustness of GPT-3.5 in personality detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T08:23:33Z)
• MedNgage: A Dataset for Understanding Engagement in Patient-Nurse Conversations [4.847266237348932]
  Patients who effectively manage their symptoms often demonstrate higher levels of engagement in conversations and interventions with healthcare practitioners. It is crucial for AI systems to understand the engagement in natural conversations between patients and practitioners to better contribute toward patient care. We present a novel dataset (MedNgage) which consists of patient-nurse conversations about cancer symptom management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T16:06:07Z)
• Semi-Supervised Variational Reasoning for Medical Dialogue Generation [70.838542865384]
  Two key characteristics are relevant for medical dialogue generation: patient states and physician actions. We propose an end-to-end variational reasoning approach to medical dialogue generation. A physician policy network composed of an action-classifier and two reasoning detectors is proposed for augmented reasoning ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-13T04:14:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.